Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() David Frackelton Gleason, still dreaming that he is 'Eduardo', wrote: wrote in message ups.com... David wrote: On 7 Jan 2007 18:01:39 -0800, wrote: HD radio is a fraud and a farse - HD Radio has only 60% the coverage of analog, and causes adjacent-channel interference. Sales of HD radios have been anemic, as the general public is not buying into this joke of a technology: http://www.radio-info.com/smf/index....ard,194.0.html It'll fail commercially but it definitely helps reception in some cases. It requires externally mounted dipole antennas - the general public is not going to bother with this joke of a technology. The three I have work fine in the LA basin. In fact, our AM, which is unlistenable inside our building in analog, produces a clean HD signal at the same location. There is NO clean HD signal, it is all QRM. Run along now, and shill elsewhere. dxAce Michigan USA |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Does anyone know how to use the Boston Accoustics Receptor HD's hidden menu? | Digital | |||
Boston Acoustics Lowers Price Of HD Radio Model | Shortwave | |||
Boston, Ma and surrounding area freq's | Scanner | |||
Charged with impersonating Boston officer; | Scanner | |||
Governmental activities. Boston Public Library. | Boatanchors |