Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
policy-ham wrote:
Found on qrz.com. The ARRL now only wants only no code hams. And as for the rest of us? Well, I'm not sure of your point, but from the title of the post, you seem to be somewhat negative...("ARRL Now Only Wants...") I don't think that's all they want, but more of a case of that's all there is, thanks to the FCC. The ARRL is just accepting the reality of the situation. 1) ANY organization generally wants to preserve itself (Gee, I know this comes as a big surprise). If due to *FCC* action (beyond the control of the ARRL), all that there is are new, no-code hams, why shouldn't the ARRL welcome them? 2) Read point one above again. This was an *FCC action*, beyond the control of the ARRL; the ARRL can welcome the newbies or put their tail between their legs and slink off into the night... 3) You ask "What happens to the rest of us?" I am sure the ARRL would be glad to welcome us as new members and/or keep us as existing members. Why would you suspect anything different? Carter, K8VT 20 wpm Extra Proud ARRL member since 1959 |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
No More Element 1 | Policy | |||
So who won the "when does NoCode happen" pool? | Policy | |||
If you had to use CW to save someone's life, would that person die? | Policy | |||
My response to Jim Wiley, KL7CC | Policy |