Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() wrote in message ups.com... Have you ever listened to AM (MW) HD? The voices sound MUCH better than analog! It's actually pleasant to listen to. But, they are only HD during the day, so they're almost useless, except on weekends! That's why WINS AM is on FM-HD2, so that it can be on all day and night. But there is so little AM listening at night that it really does not matter, business wise. |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() David Frackelton Gleason, still posing as 'Eduardo' wrote: wrote in message ups.com... Have you ever listened to AM (MW) HD? The voices sound MUCH better than analog! It's actually pleasant to listen to. But, they are only HD during the day, so they're almost useless, except on weekends! That's why WINS AM is on FM-HD2, so that it can be on all day and night. But there is so little AM listening at night that it really does not matter, business wise. Better to cause interference in the daytime when there are lots of listeners. HD/IBOC = QRM dxAce Michigan USA |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I pick off Limbaugh from WJR now, a couple hundred miles away, instead
of the local outlet, because the HD signal is cleaner audio-wise, and WJR doesn't add the trace of echo chamber that the local affiliate thinks makes them sound good. However, I need an external AM antenna to do it. The trouble with HD AM is that the ones using it aren't the ones paying the cost; the adjacent channel stations are. Why the FCC allows that, I can't say. Probably a payoff from IBOC. -- Ron Hardin On the internet, nobody knows you're a jerk. |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 15 Feb 2007 23:39:58 -0800, "David Eduardo"
wrote: wrote in message oups.com... Have you ever listened to AM (MW) HD? The voices sound MUCH better than analog! It's actually pleasant to listen to. But, they are only HD during the day, so they're almost useless, except on weekends! That's why WINS AM is on FM-HD2, so that it can be on all day and night. But there is so little AM listening at night that it really does not matter, business wise. Broadcasting in the public interest includes the night. |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "David" wrote in message ... On Thu, 15 Feb 2007 23:39:58 -0800, "David Eduardo" wrote: wrote in message roups.com... Have you ever listened to AM (MW) HD? The voices sound MUCH better than analog! It's actually pleasant to listen to. But, they are only HD during the day, so they're almost useless, except on weekends! That's why WINS AM is on FM-HD2, so that it can be on all day and night. But there is so little AM listening at night that it really does not matter, business wise. Broadcasting in the public interest includes the night. And what interest is served by a band that becomes unused and irrelevant? Only a few percent of all listeners under 35 ever listen to AM (in other words, under 10%) and that figure declines every year. Anyway, younger listeners have chosen to pretty much ignore AM all day, and the few remaining ones use the band even less at night. This is a listener decision, not a station one. Further, a station may choose what listener group it is going to serve, including by age, sex, ethnicity, etc. Service does not mean serving all people alike... just some of them. |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 17 Feb 2007 01:53:32 GMT, "David Eduardo"
wrote: And what interest is served by a band that becomes unused and irrelevant? Only a few percent of all listeners under 35 ever listen to AM (in other words, under 10%) That's still millions of people. You are a whore. |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Feb 16, 5:39�am, "David Eduardo" wrote:
wrote in message ups.com... Have you ever listened to AM (MW) HD? The voices sound MUCH better than analog! It's actually pleasant to listen to. But, they are only HD during the day, so they're almost useless, except on weekends! *That's why WINS AM is on FM-HD2, so that it can be on all day and night. But there is so little AM listening at night that it really does not matter, business wise. If that is true, then why is news/talk/.sport so popular at night. |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() wrote If that is true, then why is news/talk/.sport so popular at night. Says you? bwaHAHAHA!!!! |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Feb 16, 3:50�pm, "Guerite�" wrote:
wrote If that is true, then why is news/talk/.sport so popular at night. Says you? *bwaHAHAHA!!!! So, how much did you **** away, on your worthless HD radios ? bwaHAHAHA!!!! |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() wrote in message oups.com... So, how much did you **** away, on your worthless HD radios ? All the money I saved not spending on useless shortwave radios - bwaHAHAHA!!!! |