|
David Eduardo - A Recent Conversation
On Feb 20, 12:01 am, "David Eduardo" wrote:
"Steve" wrote in message ups.com... Again, a mistake by an industry association in a convention program is hardly an issue Their only mistake was taking you at your word. Very funny. They simply misprinted my title in a program. When a convention has 10,000 attendees and about 300 different speakers and panelists, many errors happen. Nobody int he industry gave it a second thought. Really? You mean it didn't cause the sky to fall? lol The "misprinted" your article, eh? Funny how lies can cause "typos", isn't it? As mentioned, it was my baptismal name... given to me by my godparents on that occasion. I suppose they also named you "President"? And your point is? You don't like the name? Tough. What name? She is a born dual national, who never exercised her rights to American citizenship. Not exercising a right is not the same as not having it. But above you say she was never an American citizen. Better get your story straight. It is perfectly straight. She was born a US citizen, under US law. You're the one who said she wasn't a citizen. Under Ecuadorian law, she was not a citizen until age 18 (many Latin American nations do not consider people citizens until they reach the age of majority... including Mexico, I believe). At age 18, she got an Ecuadorian passport, sufficient in ecuador to be considereed ONLY an Ecuadorian national. US law saw her as a dual national. Yes, and as you yourself pointed out, have a right to citizenship and exercising it are not the same. So far, no lie exists. I stated my elder daughter was born a dual national (she was Ecuadorian at birth is a true statement. She was American at birth was a true statement) and chose, later, which nation she would carry a passport from. Seems simple to me. "David Eduardo: ...She has never been a US citizen. " Correct. She had a right to citizenship, but lived in Ecuador where she did not exercise it. She swore citizenship to Ecuador at age 18; one country considers here only a national, and the other considers her a dual national. In other words, there are two answers to this question, depending on whose laws you folow. There are multiple answers to the question all right...depending on what you confabulate on any given occasion. - Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - |
David Eduardo - A Recent Conversation
Steve wrote: On Feb 20, 12:01 am, "David Eduardo" wrote: "Steve" wrote in message ups.com... Again, a mistake by an industry association in a convention program is hardly an issue Their only mistake was taking you at your word. Very funny. They simply misprinted my title in a program. When a convention has 10,000 attendees and about 300 different speakers and panelists, many errors happen. Nobody int he industry gave it a second thought. Really? You mean it didn't cause the sky to fall? lol The "misprinted" your article, eh? Funny how lies can cause "typos", isn't it? As mentioned, it was my baptismal name... given to me by my godparents on that occasion. I suppose they also named you "President"? And your point is? You don't like the name? Tough. What name? She is a born dual national, who never exercised her rights to American citizenship. Not exercising a right is not the same as not having it. But above you say she was never an American citizen. Better get your story straight. It is perfectly straight. She was born a US citizen, under US law. You're the one who said she wasn't a citizen. Under Ecuadorian law, she was not a citizen until age 18 (many Latin American nations do not consider people citizens until they reach the age of majority... including Mexico, I believe). At age 18, she got an Ecuadorian passport, sufficient in ecuador to be considereed ONLY an Ecuadorian national. US law saw her as a dual national. Yes, and as you yourself pointed out, have a right to citizenship and exercising it are not the same. So far, no lie exists. I stated my elder daughter was born a dual national (she was Ecuadorian at birth is a true statement. She was American at birth was a true statement) and chose, later, which nation she would carry a passport from. Seems simple to me. "David Eduardo: ...She has never been a US citizen. " Correct. She had a right to citizenship, but lived in Ecuador where she did not exercise it. She swore citizenship to Ecuador at age 18; one country considers here only a national, and the other considers her a dual national. In other words, there are two answers to this question, depending on whose laws you folow. There are multiple answers to the question all right...depending on what you confabulate on any given occasion. Yeah, and he is indeed a master confabulator. I do give him credit for being a master pathological liar as well. He is certainly on of the best I've come across. But bit by bit, the mortar is coming apart in his fantasy world. dxAce Michigan USA |
David Eduardo - A Recent Conversation
wrote in message ups.com... On Feb 20, 12:09?pm, "David Eduardo" wrote: How stupid are you ? You post all this personal information on the Internet, then provide a link to your Web site: http://davidgleason.com/ The information is pretty generic... hardly usable for any purpose except to extract the wrath of dxAss. |
David Eduardo - A Recent Conversation
"Steve" wrote in message oups.com... On Feb 20, 12:01 am, "David Eduardo" wrote: "Steve" wrote in message ups.com... Again, a mistake by an industry association in a convention program is hardly an issue Their only mistake was taking you at your word. Very funny. They simply misprinted my title in a program. When a convention has 10,000 attendees and about 300 different speakers and panelists, many errors happen. Nobody int he industry gave it a second thought. Really? You mean it didn't cause the sky to fall? lol Hardly. Since most of the attendees already knew who the presnters were at my session, I doubt most even noticed. The "misprinted" your article, eh? Funny how lies can cause "typos", isn't it? I have no idea what the reference you make is... we are talking about a program (also available on the web) for the NAB convention several years ago which had my title truncated... there was no article. It is perfectly straight. She was born a US citizen, under US law. You're the one who said she wasn't a citizen. Under US law, she may be... you can see from the interesting infromation from Mr. Gallagher that the issue is not balck and white. She was registered as a US citizen at birth, she chose not to ever get either a US passport or to pursue the citizenship otherwise. So, 40-some years later, she is Ecuadorian. Under Ecuadorian law, she was not a citizen until age 18 (many Latin American nations do not consider people citizens until they reach the age of majority... including Mexico, I believe). At age 18, she got an Ecuadorian passport, sufficient in ecuador to be considered ONLY an Ecuadorian national. US law saw her as a dual national. Yes, and as you yourself pointed out, have a right to citizenship and exercising it are not the same. Correct. As Mr Gallagher has pointed out, while another goverment may not consider her a dual national, in many cases the US government does. "David Eduardo: ...She has never been a US citizen. " Correct. She had a right to citizenship, but lived in Ecuador where she did not exercise it. She swore citizenship to Ecuador at age 18; one country considers here only a national, and the other considers her a dual national. In other words, there are two answers to this question, depending on whose laws you folow. There are multiple answers to the question all right...depending on what you confabulate on any given occasion. No, actually there are different answers if you are a representative of the US government or the Ecuadorian one... without even going into what the individual considers themselves to be. |
David Eduardo - A Recent Conversation
David Eduardo wrote: wrote in message ups.com... On Feb 20, 12:09?pm, "David Eduardo" wrote: How stupid are you ? You post all this personal information on the Internet, then provide a link to your Web site: http://davidgleason.com/ The information is pretty generic... hardly usable for any purpose except to extract the wrath of dxAss. Dance little boy, dance! LMFAO dxAce Michigan USA |
David Eduardo - A Recent Conversation
On Feb 20, 7:01?pm, "David Eduardo" wrote:
wrote in message ups.com... On Feb 20, 12:09?pm, "David Eduardo" wrote: How stupid are you ? You post all this personal information on the Internet, then provide a link to your Web site: http://davidgleason.com/ The information is pretty generic... hardly usable for any purpose except to extract the wrath of dxAss. - Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - If any of your co-workers surf the Internet here, I would be pretty embarrassed, if I were you, posting all this personal information, then being caught mutiple-times spreading lies. Now, the whole world knows who you are, and just like HD Radio/IBOC, a complete farce ! This just shows, what a dumbass high-school dropout you are ! |
David Eduardo - A Recent Conversation
"dxAce" wrote in message ... David Eduardo wrote: wrote in message ups.com... On Feb 20, 12:09?pm, "David Eduardo" wrote: How stupid are you ? You post all this personal information on the Internet, then provide a link to your Web site: http://davidgleason.com/ The information is pretty generic... hardly usable for any purpose except to extract the wrath of dxAss. Dance little boy, dance! As I said, it extracts your wrath. Unfortunately, you are not always particularly amusing... many of your responses are the same, over and over and over. When are you going on your Canadian vacation? Short on funds, eh? |
David Eduardo - A Recent Conversation
David Eduardo wrote: "dxAce" wrote in message ... David Eduardo wrote: wrote in message ups.com... On Feb 20, 12:09?pm, "David Eduardo" wrote: How stupid are you ? You post all this personal information on the Internet, then provide a link to your Web site: http://davidgleason.com/ The information is pretty generic... hardly usable for any purpose except to extract the wrath of dxAss. Dance little boy, dance! As I said, it extracts your wrath. Unfortunately, you are not always particularly amusing... many of your responses are the same, over and over and over. When are you going on your Canadian vacation? Short on funds, eh? Edweenie, I'm no where near close to being short on funds. And I'm only about 175 miles away from CanaDuh. Please, keep dancing. dxAce Michigan USA |
David Eduardo - A Recent Conversation
wrote in message ps.com... If any of your co-workers surf the Internet here, I would be pretty embarrassed, if I were you, posting all this personal information, then being caught mutiple-times spreading lies. A number of my co-workers follow these exchanges with amusement. In fact, I showed a couple of your posts about AM news talk billing and operations to the managers of two of the 50 kw stations on your list (the one you posted a link for) and they had a grand old time chuckling about how little the general public knows about the actual operation of radio stations. The comment about AM news talkers getting higer rates than FMs got more laughter than a good Leno monologue. Now, the whole world knows who you are, I have never hideen my name on Usenet... or even back to the BBS era on the Well. and just like HD Radio/IBOC, a complete farce ! There are already over 1000 HD FM's, and there are increasing numbers of receivers. Nobody in the industry ever thought that the project would bear short-term fruit (heck, the development started around 1991) so nobody in the industry, today, thinks that HD is a farce. It is simply one tool in a kit of many things radio has to do to remain viable. AM, on the other hand, has bigger problems than whether HD will work... the entire band, good stations and bad, is in rapid decline and the remaining listeners are ageing. This just shows, what a dumbass high-school dropout you are ! As I said, I dropped out to put my own radio station on the air in a large market... a station that became #1 in its first few months on the air. I must not have been too dumb, then. |
David Eduardo - A Recent Conversation
"dxAce" wrote in message ... Please, keep dancing. Is that a macro, or do you think it is so original it needs repetition several times a day? |
David Eduardo - A Recent Conversation
David Frackelton Gleason, posing as 'Eduardo', Univision's shining star in the race to make a pile of BS higher than any other in history decided to write: "dxAce" wrote in message ... Please, keep dancing. Is that a macro, or do you think it is so original it needs repetition several times a day? It's kinda like your lies and obfuscation's.. repeat, repeat, repeat. Keep dancing oh fraudulent one! dxAce Michigan USA |
David Eduardo - A Recent Conversation
"dxAce" wrote in message ... Keep dancing oh fraudulent one! I guess it is a macro... or an autoresponder. |
David Eduardo - A Recent Conversation
David Eduardo wrote: "dxAce" wrote in message ... Keep dancing oh fraudulent one! I guess it is a macro... or an autoresponder. You'd best stop guessing, boy. dxAce Michigan USA |
David Eduardo - A Recent Conversation
"dxAce" wrote in message ... David Eduardo wrote: "dxAce" wrote in message ... Keep dancing oh fraudulent one! I guess it is a macro... or an autoresponder. You'd best stop guessing, boy. Take your best shot... I have the ng on a big 10 by 12 screen in a conference room and a half dozen of my associates have a pool going on what inane statement you will post next. Go for it... |
David Eduardo - A Recent Conversation
David Eduardo wrote: "dxAce" wrote in message ... David Eduardo wrote: "dxAce" wrote in message ... Keep dancing oh fraudulent one! I guess it is a macro... or an autoresponder. You'd best stop guessing, boy. Take your best shot... I have the ng on a big 10 by 12 screen in a conference room and a half dozen of my associates have a pool going on what inane statement you will post next. Go for it... Liar, liar, pantalunes on fire! LMFAO at one of the most fraudulent individuals I've ever come across in my 53 years on the planet. dxAce Michigan USA |
David Eduardo - A Recent Conversation
David Eduardo wrote: "dxAce" wrote in message ... David Eduardo wrote: "dxAce" wrote in message ... Keep dancing oh fraudulent one! I guess it is a macro... or an autoresponder. You'd best stop guessing, boy. Take your best shot... I have the ng on a big 10 by 12 screen in a conference room and a half dozen of my associates have a pool going on what inane statement you will post next. Go for it... Please let me know who won the pool.. That'll make another fine addition to my collection of your lies. LMFAO dxAce Michigan USA |
David Eduardo - A Recent Conversation
On Feb 20, 7:42?pm, "David Eduardo" wrote:
wrote in message ps.com... If any of your co-workers surf the Internet here, I would be pretty embarrassed, if I were you, posting all this personal information, then being caught mutiple-times spreading lies. A number of my co-workers follow these exchanges with amusement. In fact, I showed a couple of your posts about AM news talk billing and operations to the managers of two of the 50 kw stations on your list (the one you posted a link for) and they had a grand old time chuckling about how little the general public knows about the actual operation of radio stations. The comment about AM news talkers getting higer rates than FMs got more laughter than a good Leno monologue. Now, the whole world knows who you are, I have never hideen my name on Usenet... or even back to the BBS era on the Well. and just like HD Radio/IBOC, a complete farce ! There are already over 1000 HD FM's, and there are increasing numbers of receivers. Nobody in the industry ever thought that the project would bear short-term fruit (heck, the development started around 1991) so nobody in the industry, today, thinks that HD is a farce. It is simply one tool in a kit of many things radio has to do to remain viable. AM, on the other hand, has bigger problems than whether HD will work... the entire band, good stations and bad, is in rapid decline and the remaining listeners are ageing. This just shows, what a dumbass high-school dropout you are ! As I said, I dropped out to put my own radio station on the air in a large market... a station that became #1 in its first few months on the air. I must not have been too dumb, then. Since Univision is part of the HD Radio farce, did your co-workers find this funny: "Dead Technology Walking" "Deader than Microsoft's new iPod competitor Zune this holiday gift buying season will be HD radio. Expensive. It has no rhyme nor reason to anyone who doesn't own or operate a radio station. It's remarkable to me that any sane radio executive can believe that HD radio will give the industry the rebirth it needs to satisfy its prime audience -- Wall Street investors -- I mean, listeners." http://insidemusicmedia.blogspot.com...y-walking.html "In-Stat: Digital Radio Set to Take Off" "In 2006, 73 percent of respondents to an In-Stat U.S. consumer survey were aware of HD Radio on some level." http://beradio.com/eyeoniboc/instat-digital-radio-set/ 1) http://www.alexaholic.com/hdradio.co...om+xmradio.com 2) http://www.google.com/trends?q=%22hd... =all&date=all As far as consumer-interest, HD Radio is "Dead Technology Walking". |
David Eduardo - A Recent Conversation
"dxAce" wrote in message ... David Eduardo wrote: "dxAce" wrote in message ... David Eduardo wrote: "dxAce" wrote in message ... Keep dancing oh fraudulent one! I guess it is a macro... or an autoresponder. You'd best stop guessing, boy. Take your best shot... I have the ng on a big 10 by 12 screen in a conference room and a half dozen of my associates have a pool going on what inane statement you will post next. Go for it... Liar, liar, pantalunes on fire! LMFAO at one of the most fraudulent individuals I've ever come across in my 53 years on the planet. Verdict: nobody laughed here in the conference room...Nice try. |
David Eduardo - A Recent Conversation
"dxAce" wrote in message ... David Eduardo wrote: "dxAce" wrote in message ... David Eduardo wrote: "dxAce" wrote in message ... Keep dancing oh fraudulent one! I guess it is a macro... or an autoresponder. You'd best stop guessing, boy. Take your best shot... I have the ng on a big 10 by 12 screen in a conference room and a half dozen of my associates have a pool going on what inane statement you will post next. Go for it... Please let me know who won the pool.. That'll make another fine addition to my collection of your lies. Ismar SantaCruz did. He said it would be a dud. |
David Eduardo - A Recent Conversation
wrote in message ups.com... On Feb 20, 7:42?pm, "David Eduardo" wrote: Since Univision is part of the HD Radio farce, did your co-workers find this funny: We all know that HD is a long-term project, and we don't expect immediate rewards, even from the HD-2 channels. To say that something that is less than a year old (since the official launch and the Consortium ad campaign's commencement) is a dud so early on is silly. In fact, since HD is an incremental opportunity for radio, not a replacement, the speed at which it develops is not a significant factor. |
David Eduardo - A Recent Conversation
David Eduardo wrote: "dxAce" wrote in message ... David Eduardo wrote: "dxAce" wrote in message ... David Eduardo wrote: "dxAce" wrote in message ... Keep dancing oh fraudulent one! I guess it is a macro... or an autoresponder. You'd best stop guessing, boy. Take your best shot... I have the ng on a big 10 by 12 screen in a conference room and a half dozen of my associates have a pool going on what inane statement you will post next. Go for it... Liar, liar, pantalunes on fire! LMFAO at one of the most fraudulent individuals I've ever come across in my 53 years on the planet. Verdict: nobody laughed here in the conference room...Nice try. Why of course! Nobody laughed, because nobody was there. Get a clue, boy! LMFAO dxAce Michigan USA |
David Eduardo - A Recent Conversation
David Eduardo wrote: "dxAce" wrote in message ... David Eduardo wrote: "dxAce" wrote in message ... David Eduardo wrote: "dxAce" wrote in message ... Keep dancing oh fraudulent one! I guess it is a macro... or an autoresponder. You'd best stop guessing, boy. Take your best shot... I have the ng on a big 10 by 12 screen in a conference room and a half dozen of my associates have a pool going on what inane statement you will post next. Go for it... Please let me know who won the pool.. That'll make another fine addition to my collection of your lies. Ismar SantaCruz did. He said it would be a dud. Sure. Does Ismar like being a figment of your imagination? dxAce Michigan USA |
David Eduardo - A Recent Conversation
On Feb 20, 7:42?pm, "David Eduardo" wrote:
wrote in message ps.com... If any of your co-workers surf the Internet here, I would be pretty embarrassed, if I were you, posting all this personal information, then being caught mutiple-times spreading lies. A number of my co-workers follow these exchanges with amusement. In fact, I showed a couple of your posts about AM news talk billing and operations to the managers of two of the 50 kw stations on your list (the one you posted a link for) and they had a grand old time chuckling about how little the general public knows about the actual operation of radio stations. The comment about AM news talkers getting higer rates than FMs got more laughter than a good Leno monologue. Now, the whole world knows who you are, I have never hideen my name on Usenet... or even back to the BBS era on the Well. and just like HD Radio/IBOC, a complete farce ! There are already over 1000 HD FM's, and there are increasing numbers of receivers. Nobody in the industry ever thought that the project would bear short-term fruit (heck, the development started around 1991) so nobody in the industry, today, thinks that HD is a farce. It is simply one tool in a kit of many things radio has to do to remain viable. AM, on the other hand, has bigger problems than whether HD will work... the entire band, good stations and bad, is in rapid decline and the remaining listeners are ageing. This just shows, what a dumbass high-school dropout you are ! As I said, I dropped out to put my own radio station on the air in a large market... a station that became #1 in its first few months on the air. I must not have been too dumb, then. "Desperately Seeking Good News for Radio Industry" "Neither of these suggestions are easy to do. But if action isn't taken to at least try, six months from know you're going to have an even tougher road." http://www.audiographics.com/agd/021907-1.htm "Radio in the United States" "FM radio, aided by the invention of ever smaller portable radios and inexpensive "Walkman" headsets, dominates music programs, while AM has shifted to "talk" and news formats. Barely in existence 25 years ago, "talk radio," in which celebrities and experts from various fields answer listener "call-in" questions and offer their advice on various topics, has grown spectacularly in recent years. It has contributed to the comeback of AM radio." http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radio_in_the_United_States Again, just a full-of-**** IBOC shill. |
David Eduardo - A Recent Conversation
"dxAce" wrote in message ... Verdict: nobody laughed here in the conference room...Nice try. Why of course! Nobody laughed, because nobody was there. Call the Houston Hobby Marriott and ask who is in the big meeting room tonight... and tomorrow. There are 128 people here now. Of course, I would not show your idiotic posts for our listeners... but you can kinda' get the idea. |
David Eduardo - A Recent Conversation
"dxAce" wrote in message ... David Eduardo wrote: "dxAce" wrote in message ... David Eduardo wrote: "dxAce" wrote in message ... David Eduardo wrote: "dxAce" wrote in message ... Keep dancing oh fraudulent one! I guess it is a macro... or an autoresponder. You'd best stop guessing, boy. Take your best shot... I have the ng on a big 10 by 12 screen in a conference room and a half dozen of my associates have a pool going on what inane statement you will post next. Go for it... Please let me know who won the pool.. That'll make another fine addition to my collection of your lies. Ismar SantaCruz did. He said it would be a dud. Sure. Does Ismar like being a figment of your imagination? He's a VP of the company. Nice try. See how often you are wrong? |
David Eduardo - A Recent Conversation
wrote in message oups.com... "Radio in the United States" "FM radio, aided by the invention of ever smaller portable radios and inexpensive "Walkman" headsets, dominates music programs, while AM has shifted to "talk" and news formats. Barely in existence 25 years ago, "talk radio," in which celebrities and experts from various fields answer listener "call-in" questions and offer their advice on various topics, has grown spectacularly in recent years. It has contributed to the comeback of AM radio." That, of course, is a crock. The fact is that talk formats are starting to migrate to FM, as witnessed by the list I have posted several times. AM talk formats existed all the way back in the 60's with hosts like Joe Pyne and Bill Ballance. KABC in LA was #1 throughout the 70's with a news and talk format, to give one example. What restricted the growth of the format was both the lack of talent at the local level and the Fairness Doctrine. When the deregulation of radio under Reagan eliminated Fairness and did not require opposing viewpoints to be granted equal time, talents like Rush Limbaugh developed and went national via syndication. AM shares, however, have declined every year since the late 60's when the FCC mandated the end of AM/FM simulcasts. In 1977, the national FM share passed the AM share, and now FM commands about 80% of all listening (each market is a little different... some are less, like San Francisco, and others are more, like Allentown). Today, per Arbitron, AM shares below age 45 are in the single digits (that's the sum of all AM stations in each market) and the bulk of AM listeners are over 55... which in the rated markets means you can not sell this audience segment. There is no comeback of AM radio. AM shares, in Arbitron, are at the lowest level ever. And the audience is ageing every year. |
David Eduardo - A Recent Conversation
David Eduardo wrote: "dxAce" wrote in message ... Verdict: nobody laughed here in the conference room...Nice try. Why of course! Nobody laughed, because nobody was there. Call the Houston Hobby Marriott and ask who is in the big meeting room tonight... and tomorrow. There are 128 people here now. Of course, I would not show your idiotic posts for our listeners... but you can kinda' get the idea. Yeah, I get the idea that you're a pathological liar! LMFAO dxAce Michigan USA |
David Eduardo - A Recent Conversation
David Eduardo wrote: "dxAce" wrote in message ... David Eduardo wrote: "dxAce" wrote in message ... David Eduardo wrote: "dxAce" wrote in message ... David Eduardo wrote: "dxAce" wrote in message ... Keep dancing oh fraudulent one! I guess it is a macro... or an autoresponder. You'd best stop guessing, boy. Take your best shot... I have the ng on a big 10 by 12 screen in a conference room and a half dozen of my associates have a pool going on what inane statement you will post next. Go for it... Please let me know who won the pool.. That'll make another fine addition to my collection of your lies. Ismar SantaCruz did. He said it would be a dud. Sure. Does Ismar like being a figment of your imagination? He's a VP of the company. Nice try. See how often you are wrong? But simply because you state that Mr. Cruz is with you doesn't necessarily mean he's actually there! LMFAO at the delusional 'tard. dxAce Michigan USA |
David Eduardo - A Recent Conversation
On Feb 20, 4:07 pm, "David Eduardo" wrote:
"Steve" wrote in message oups.com... On Feb 20, 12:01 am, "David Eduardo" wrote: "Steve" wrote in message roups.com... Again, a mistake by an industry association in a convention program is hardly an issue Their only mistake was taking you at your word. Very funny. They simply misprinted my title in a program. When a convention has 10,000 attendees and about 300 different speakers and panelists, many errors happen. Nobody int he industry gave it a second thought. Really? You mean it didn't cause the sky to fall? lol Hardly. Since most of the attendees already knew who the presnters were at my session, I doubt most even noticed. At most I suspect there were a few snickers from people who knew who you really are. The "misprinted" your article, eh? Funny how lies can cause "typos", isn't it? I have no idea what the reference you make is... we are talking about a program (also available on the web) for the NAB convention several years ago which had my title truncated... there was no article. "Truncated". Yeah, you weren't lying. You were "truncating". It is perfectly straight. She was born a US citizen, under US law. You're the one who said she wasn't a citizen. Under US law, she may be... you can see from the interesting infromation from Mr. Gallagher that the issue is not balck and white. She was registered as a US citizen at birth, she chose not to ever get either a US passport or to pursue the citizenship otherwise. So, 40-some years later, she is Ecuadorian. Under Ecuadorian law, she was not a citizen until age 18 (many Latin American nations do not consider people citizens until they reach the age of majority... including Mexico, I believe). At age 18, she got an Ecuadorian passport, sufficient in ecuador to be considered ONLY an Ecuadorian national. US law saw her as a dual national. Yes, and as you yourself pointed out, have a right to citizenship and exercising it are not the same. Correct. As Mr Gallagher has pointed out, while another goverment may not consider her a dual national, in many cases the US government does. Correct. So, there's no point in continuing to lie about your daughter's citizenship status. "David Eduardo: ...She has never been a US citizen. " Correct. She had a right to citizenship, but lived in Ecuador where she did not exercise it. She swore citizenship to Ecuador at age 18; one country considers here only a national, and the other considers her a dual national. In other words, there are two answers to this question, depending on whose laws you folow. There are multiple answers to the question all right...depending on what you confabulate on any given occasion. No, actually there are different answers if you are a representative of the US government or the Ecuadorian one... without even going into what the individual considers themselves to be.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - No, actually there are different answers depending on whether or not you are a liar, and especially if you're a poor liar. |
David Eduardo - A Recent Conversation
"dxAce" wrote in message ... David Eduardo wrote: your lies. Ismar SantaCruz did. He said it would be a dud. Sure. Does Ismar like being a figment of your imagination? He's a VP of the company. Nice try. See how often you are wrong? But simply because you state that Mr. Cruz is with you doesn't necessarily mean he's actually there! For a supposed DXer to think "Cruz" is the last name of an Hispanic is kind of bizarre. |
David Eduardo - A Recent Conversation
"Steve" wrote in message ups.com... On Feb 20, 4:07 pm, "David Eduardo" wrote: I have no idea what the reference you make is... we are talking about a program (also available on the web) for the NAB convention several years ago which had my title truncated... there was no article. "Truncated". Yeah, you weren't lying. You were "truncating". We are talking about a convention program that botched my title, not about anything I personally did. As I said, this sort of thing is very common. The same program had our Director of Engineering listed as "Chief Engineer" instead. The real issue is that this is one isolated error by the NAB, and did not bother any of the roughly 3,000 people at the panel. |
David Eduardo - A Recent Conversation
David Eduardo wrote: "dxAce" wrote in message ... David Eduardo wrote: your lies. Ismar SantaCruz did. He said it would be a dud. Sure. Does Ismar like being a figment of your imagination? He's a VP of the company. Nice try. See how often you are wrong? But simply because you state that Mr. Cruz is with you doesn't necessarily mean he's actually there! For a supposed DXer to think "Cruz" is the last name of an Hispanic is kind of bizarre. For a supposed 'Executive' VP of Programming for Univision to be spending so much time here during working hours is pretty bizarre as well... LMFAO at the mentally ill fool, dxAce Michigan USA |
David Eduardo - A Recent Conversation
"dxAce" wrote in message ... David Eduardo wrote: "dxAce" wrote in message ... David Eduardo wrote: your lies. Ismar SantaCruz did. He said it would be a dud. Sure. Does Ismar like being a figment of your imagination? He's a VP of the company. Nice try. See how often you are wrong? But simply because you state that Mr. Cruz is with you doesn't necessarily mean he's actually there! For a supposed DXer to think "Cruz" is the last name of an Hispanic is kind of bizarre. For a supposed 'Executive' VP of Programming for Univision to be spending so much time here during working hours is pretty bizarre as well... In other words, you did not know next-to-the-last surname is the paternal surname and the one used when only one is employed. In any case, SantaCruz is a single surname, despite the capitalization. As I said, for a DXer not to know this seems bizarre. I've been working since 4 AM, which is about 15 hours more than you worked today. |
David Eduardo - A Recent Conversation
David Eduardo wrote: "dxAce" wrote in message ... David Eduardo wrote: "dxAce" wrote in message ... David Eduardo wrote: your lies. Ismar SantaCruz did. He said it would be a dud. Sure. Does Ismar like being a figment of your imagination? He's a VP of the company. Nice try. See how often you are wrong? But simply because you state that Mr. Cruz is with you doesn't necessarily mean he's actually there! For a supposed DXer to think "Cruz" is the last name of an Hispanic is kind of bizarre. For a supposed 'Executive' VP of Programming for Univision to be spending so much time here during working hours is pretty bizarre as well... In other words, you did not know next-to-the-last surname is the paternal surname and the one used when only one is employed. In any case, SantaCruz is a single surname, despite the capitalization. As I said, for a DXer not to know this seems bizarre. I've been working since 4 AM, which is about 15 hours more than you worked today. It appears, Mr. Gleason, that you are suffering from either alcohol abuse, drug abuse or have severe mental health issues. I suggest that you contact Univision's Human Resources Department to arrange a treatment program. Even though you are of advanced age, treatment can still be of benefit to you. dxAce Michigan USA |
David Eduardo - A Recent Conversation
"dxAce" wrote in message ... It appears, Mr. Gleason, that you are suffering from either alcohol abuse, drug abuse or have severe mental health issues. I suggest that you contact Univision's Human Resources Department to arrange a treatment program. Even though you are of advanced age, treatment can still be of benefit to you. Another macro? |
David Eduardo - A Recent Conversation
On Feb 19, 9:16 pm, "David Eduardo" wrote:
"RHF" wrote in message oups.com... On Feb 19, 5:54 pm, "David Eduardo" wrote: wrote in message groups.com... Yea shill, the AM band is so dead: http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/amq?state...freq=530&fre2=... I must admit, I have never seen anyone so full-of-**** ! :-) You totally miss the main point: AM is declining in audience in the US, having less than 20% of what it had 40 years ago... Most AMs have an audience significantly based in over-55-year-olds, which agency advertisers do not want. Revenues are falling, and many successful AMs are looking to move their formats to FM to survive. Canada is eliminating all but a few AMs, and at least one province has no AMs at all any more. South Africa has no AMs. Most of Latin America has fewer AMs than 25 years ago, with the exception of Mexico which was always under-radioed due to NARBA. DE - NARBA ? ? ? ~ RHF North American Radio Broadcasting Agreement -Cirica 1941- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/North_A...ting_Agreement NARBA "Clear Channel" AM/MW Radio Stations http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clear_channel AM/MW Station Classes : Clear, Regional, and Local Channels http://www.fcc.gov/mb/audio/amclasses.html BIG USA, Mexico, and Canadian AM/MW Radio Stations -compiled by- AC6V http://www.ac6v.com/clearam.htm MAP - Night-Time AM/MW 50 KW Powerhouses in the USA http://www.fortunecity.com/tinpan/bl...rp/amradio.htm Your point is? There are many 50 kw stations, but only a few are the original 50 kw Class 1-A clears. and not all are news /talk, either. Many of the remaining 50's are either directional, lower power at night or both... many can not even cover their own full local market. A good example is the former WTOP, a 50 kw AM in DC... that needed several AM and FM repeaters to cover the DC market incompletely. They moved to FM last year, and are doing much better now.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - DE - You used the acronym "NARBA" which was something that did not cause me to think of the "North American Radio Broadcasting Agreement" After all I am only a Radio Listener and not in the Broadcast Radio Business like you. Again I will repeat myself by posting : North American Radio Broadcasting Agreement -Cirica 1941- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/North_A...ting_Agreement NARBA "Clear Channel" AM/MW Radio Stations http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clear_channel BIG USA, Mexico, and Canadian AM/MW Radio Stations -compiled by- AC6V = http://www.ac6v.com/clearam.htm MAP - Night-Time AM/MW 50 KW Powerhouses in the USA http://www.fortunecity.com/tinpan/bl...rp/amradio.htm And the 'point' being . . . that back in 1941 AM Radio was "King". those were the days of great coast-to-coast am radio ~ RHF |
David Eduardo - A Recent Conversation
"RHF" wrote in message oups.com... And the 'point' being . . . that back in 1941 AM Radio was "King". those were the days of great coast-to-coast am radio ~ RHF . Yes, that was because there was no TV. There was only light usage of radio in the daytime as most people had only one household radio, in the living room. Portables and even car radios were not a factor. Since the 50's, following the lift of the TV Freeze, the night listening to radio has been much lower. Daytime listening became the key to radio stations. Today, 7 PM-Midnight listening is less than a third the level in morning drive, mid-days or afternoons. Nearly no revenue is generated in the evening, either. So, with less than 1000 stations in 1941, listeners often had to listen to distant signals at night to hear their favorite network programs. Today, with 14,000 stations, few are far from a broad choice of signals. And the comedies and drama shows are on TV, not rado. So nighttime distant reception by the average listener has no benefit other than curiosity. |
David Eduardo - A Recent Conversation
David Eduardo wrote: "dxAce" wrote in message ... It appears, Mr. Gleason, that you are suffering from either alcohol abuse, drug abuse or have severe mental health issues. I suggest that you contact Univision's Human Resources Department to arrange a treatment program. Even though you are of advanced age, treatment can still be of benefit to you. Another macro? Damn, you are surely screwed up. dxAce Michigan USA |
David Eduardo - A Recent Conversation
In article ,
"David Eduardo" wrote: wrote in message ps.com... If any of your co-workers surf the Internet here, I would be pretty embarrassed, if I were you, posting all this personal information, then being caught mutiple-times spreading lies. A number of my co-workers follow these exchanges with amusement. In fact, I showed a couple of your posts about AM news talk billing and operations to the managers of two of the 50 kw stations on your list (the one you posted a link for) and they had a grand old time chuckling about how little the general public knows about the actual operation of radio stations. The comment about AM news talkers getting higer rates than FMs got more laughter than a good Leno monologue. I have been following your exchange with DxAce and this guy you responded to and I must say that more you post the worse you look. This type of response sounds like total BS. You used to have some credibility with me but not any more after reading this thread. You see I don't just discount what someone states because I don't like it and make no mistake I generally do not like the viewpoint of what you post. I'm not interest in your ego but news and information that you posses and decide to share on Usenet. -- Telamon Ventura, California |
David Eduardo - A Recent Conversation
On Feb 20, 9:28 pm, "David Eduardo" wrote:
"Steve" wrote in message oups.com... On Feb 20, 7:39 pm, "David Eduardo" wrote: "Steve" wrote in message roups.com... On Feb 20, 4:07 pm, "David Eduardo" wrote: I have no idea what the reference you make is... we are talking about a program (also available on the web) for the NAB convention several years ago which had my title truncated... there was no article. "Truncated". Yeah, you weren't lying. You were "truncating". We are talking about a convention program that botched my title, not about anything I personally did. That's right. They believed you lie and this means *they* botched things up. Uh huh. As I said, this sort of thing is very common. Sure it is. People lie all the time. The same program had our Director of Engineering listed as "Chief Engineer" instead. And were you behind that as well? No, the steering committe of the NAB does the programs, not the speakers. They get their information from somewhere. They don't emerge from their mother's wombs knowing who will present on which topic, or what so-and-so's job title is. So now it appears you not only lied about your own job title but you also lied about a colleague's in order to promote your own political ends. Pathetic. - Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:59 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com