|
David Eduardo - A Recent Conversation
dxAce: Hey, did she [referring to Edweenie's daughter] get kicked out of Ecuador
at gunpoint along with you? David Eduardo: No, she is an Ecuadorian citizen, and currently owns several radio stations there. dxAce: She's an American citizen as well, right? David Eduardo: No. dxAce: When did she change that? David Eduardo: It's by birth. She has never been a US citizen. dxAce: Interesting. Here is what you stated back on June 20, 2003 in alt.politics.immigration: "My oldest daughter is a dual Ecuadorian and American citizen, as she3 was born in Ecuador and registered at the US Embassy as being of American parentage." http://groups.google.com/group/alt.p...b6304d9024c3ce I always find it interesting when I must remind a pathological liar of the things they've stated in the past. --- David Eduardo then lapsed into his usual pathological obfuscation. Absolutely priceless. |
David Eduardo - A Recent Conversation
On Feb 19, 6:44 am, dxAce wrote:
dxAce: Hey, did she [referring to Edweenie's daughter] get kicked out of Ecuador at gunpoint along with you? David Eduardo: No, she is an Ecuadorian citizen, and currently owns several radio stations there. dxAce: She's an American citizen as well, right? David Eduardo: No. dxAce: When did she change that? David Eduardo: It's by birth. She has never been a US citizen. dxAce: Interesting. Here is what you stated back on June 20, 2003 in alt.politics.immigration: "My oldest daughter is a dual Ecuadorian and American citizen, as she3 was born in Ecuador and registered at the US Embassy as being of American parentage." http://groups.google.com/group/alt.p.../browse_thread... I always find it interesting when I must remind a pathological liar of the things they've stated in the past. --- David Eduardo then lapsed into his usual pathological obfuscation. Absolutely priceless We've seen him confused now about his own job title, his ethnicity and now the citizenship of his daughter--assuming that he in fact HAS a daughter. I can only wonder why this guy is spending his time here, in this group. He needs a group that's about psychotherapy. |
David Eduardo - A Recent Conversation
Steve wrote: On Feb 19, 6:44 am, dxAce wrote: dxAce: Hey, did she [referring to Edweenie's daughter] get kicked out of Ecuador at gunpoint along with you? David Eduardo: No, she is an Ecuadorian citizen, and currently owns several radio stations there. dxAce: She's an American citizen as well, right? David Eduardo: No. dxAce: When did she change that? David Eduardo: It's by birth. She has never been a US citizen. dxAce: Interesting. Here is what you stated back on June 20, 2003 in alt.politics.immigration: "My oldest daughter is a dual Ecuadorian and American citizen, as she3 was born in Ecuador and registered at the US Embassy as being of American parentage." http://groups.google.com/group/alt.p.../browse_thread... I always find it interesting when I must remind a pathological liar of the things they've stated in the past. --- David Eduardo then lapsed into his usual pathological obfuscation. Absolutely priceless We've seen him confused now about his own job title, his ethnicity and now the citizenship of his daughter--assuming that he in fact HAS a daughter. I can only wonder why this guy is spending his time here, in this group. He needs a group that's about psychotherapy. At this advanced stage of his life I somehow doubt that his propensity to lie pathologically can be cured. As far as I can figure his problem began when he was around 10 years old and at this point he is 60, so he's been at it for some time. Everything he says must be gone over with a fine toothed comb. dxAce Michigan USA |
David Eduardo - A Recent Conversation
We've seen him confused now about his own job title, his ethnicity and now the citizenship of his daughter--assuming that he in fact HAS a daughter. I can only wonder why this guy is spending his time here, in this group. He needs a group that's about psychotherapy. At this advanced stage of his life I somehow doubt that his propensity to lie pathologically can be cured. As far as I can figure his problem began when he was around 10 years old and at this point he is 60, so he's been at it for some time. Everything he says must be gone over with a fine toothed comb. dxAce Michigan USA Why do you read his stuff, open it or reply to him???? Burr +8z Grundigs |
David Eduardo - A Recent Conversation
"download.com" wrote: We've seen him confused now about his own job title, his ethnicity and now the citizenship of his daughter--assuming that he in fact HAS a daughter. I can only wonder why this guy is spending his time here, in this group. He needs a group that's about psychotherapy. At this advanced stage of his life I somehow doubt that his propensity to lie pathologically can be cured. As far as I can figure his problem began when he was around 10 years old and at this point he is 60, so he's been at it for some time. Everything he says must be gone over with a fine toothed comb. Why do you read his stuff, open it or reply to him???? Because he's so much fun! dxAce Michigan USA |
David Eduardo - A Recent Conversation
Good Night Cus
+8z |
David Eduardo - A Recent Conversation
"download.com" wrote: Good Night Cus Hey, you have a good night! dxAce Michigan USA |
David Eduardo - A Recent Conversation
"Steve" wrote in message oups.com... We've seen him confused now about his own job title, A typo is not confusing to me. Apparently it is to you his ethnicity Ethnically, I am Irish and Celt. There is no confusion there. and now the citizenship of his daughter She is a born dual national, who never exercised her rights to American citizenship. Not exercising a right is not the same as not having it. --assuming that he in fact HAS a daughter. Actually, I have four. I can only wonder why this guy is spending his time here, in this group. He needs a group that's about psychotherapy. That _would_ help me understand you and dxAss. Good idea. |
David Eduardo - A Recent Conversation
On Feb 19, 9:44?am, dxAce wrote:
dxAce: Hey, did she [referring to Edweenie's daughter] get kicked out of Ecuador at gunpoint along with you? David Eduardo: No, she is an Ecuadorian citizen, and currently owns several radio stations there. dxAce: She's an American citizen as well, right? David Eduardo: No. dxAce: When did she change that? David Eduardo: It's by birth. She has never been a US citizen. dxAce: Interesting. Here is what you stated back on June 20, 2003 in alt.politics.immigration: "My oldest daughter is a dual Ecuadorian and American citizen, as she3 was born in Ecuador and registered at the US Embassy as being of American parentage." http://groups.google.com/group/alt.p.../browse_thread... I always find it interesting when I must remind a pathological liar of the things they've stated in the past. --- David Eduardo then lapsed into his usual pathological obfuscation. Absolutely priceless. I have no idea, how Univision could put up with someone, who spends 24/7 on message boards, or maybe he doesn't even work. His sole existence in life is to try and make others miserable - this IBOC shill would love to put an end to SW and AM DX'ers, to the sole gain of HD Radio/IBOC. To his displeasure, SW and analog AM will be around for many years, as HD Radio/IBOC is failing on AM, and will just end up being a niche market for radio-geeks. Here is an interesting on- going poll by BMW owners, who are interested in buying either Sirius, or HD Radio: http://www.bimmerfest.com/forums/sho...d.php?t=152874 This shill realizes that for HD Radio/IBOC to succeed, in part, he needs to convince the radio-geeks - you would think by now, with all the hatred towards IBOC, he would have gotten a clue. He spreads the sames lies on radio-info.com. |
David Eduardo - A Recent Conversation
wrote in message ps.com... I have no idea, how Univision could put up with someone, who spends 24/7 on message boards, or maybe he doesn't even work. I don't know how long it takes you to think through a brief response, but if I sepnd 30 minutes a day on Usenet, that's a lot. Last I checked, most people have 2/3 of the day and all the weekend free to do whatever they want... or about 128 hours of free time a week. His sole existence in life is to try and make others miserable .... no, only to those who post material that is not factual, such as your mistaken claims that AM news / talk stations get higher rates than FMs or that AM in general is prospering. - this IBOC shill would love to put an end to SW and AM DX'ers, to the sole gain of HD Radio/IBOC. This is the first time SW has come into0 the argument. I think SW of its own is dead in most of the world, and is certainly, being skywave based, not an apprpriate medium for HD. AM DXers are now very few in number, and hardly have any claim to skywave service when improving hte viability of AM at the local level is concerned. Hey, it's a hobby, not an essential service. To his displeasure, SW and analog AM will be around for many years, SW stations numbber perhaps half of the level of the 70's... AM is dying. In Canada, they have reduced the station count by nearly 60%. South Africa has no AMs left, etc. The listenership in the US dis down to a small level, mostly composed of people over 50. Folks under 40 very nearly do not listen at all to AM. as HD Radio/IBOC is failing on AM, and will just end up being a niche market for radio-geeks. Actually, the viable metro signals will all be HD. It does not matter what the marginal signals do, as they represent no listenership. Here is an interesting on- going poll by BMW owners, who are interested in buying either Sirius, or HD Radio: http://www.bimmerfest.com/forums/sho...d.php?t=152874 This shill realizes that for HD Radio/IBOC to succeed, in part, he needs to convince the radio-geeks - you would think by now, with all the hatred towards IBOC, he would have gotten a clue. He spreads the sames lies on radio-info.com. HD was just launched in 2006... and we all believe it to be a multi-year building process, not a quick fix. It may never fix AM, however, as the band is nearly dead. |
David Eduardo - A Recent Conversation
On Feb 19, 1:45?pm, "David Eduardo" wrote:
wrote in message ps.com... I have no idea, how Univision could put up with someone, who spends 24/7 on message boards, or maybe he doesn't even work. I don't know how long it takes you to think through a brief response, but if I sepnd 30 minutes a day on Usenet, that's a lot. Last I checked, most people have 2/3 of the day and all the weekend free to do whatever they want... or about 128 hours of free time a week. His sole existence in life is to try and make others miserable ... no, only to those who post material that is not factual, such as your mistaken claims that AM news / talk stations get higher rates than FMs or that AM in general is prospering. - this IBOC shill would love to put an end to SW and AM DX'ers, to the sole gain of HD Radio/IBOC. This is the first time SW has come into0 the argument. I think SW of its own is dead in most of the world, and is certainly, being skywave based, not an apprpriate medium for HD. AM DXers are now very few in number, and hardly have any claim to skywave service when improving hte viability of AM at the local level is concerned. Hey, it's a hobby, not an essential service. To his displeasure, SW and analog AM will be around for many years, SW stations numbber perhaps half of the level of the 70's... AM is dying. In Canada, they have reduced the station count by nearly 60%. South Africa has no AMs left, etc. The listenership in the US dis down to a small level, mostly composed of people over 50. Folks under 40 very nearly do not listen at all to AM. as HD Radio/IBOC is failing on AM, and will just end up being a niche market for radio-geeks. Actually, the viable metro signals will all be HD. It does not matter what the marginal signals do, as they represent no listenership. Here is an interesting on- going poll by BMW owners, who are interested in buying either Sirius, or HD Radio: http://www.bimmerfest.com/forums/sho...d.php?t=152874 This shill realizes that for HD Radio/IBOC to succeed, in part, he needs to convince the radio-geeks - you would think by now, with all the hatred towards IBOC, he would have gotten a clue. He spreads the sames lies on radio-info.com. HD was just launched in 2006... and we all believe it to be a multi-year building process, not a quick fix. It may never fix AM, however, as the band is nearly dead. - Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - News/talk/sports is alive-and-well on the "clears". |
David Eduardo - A Recent Conversation
On Feb 19, 1:45?pm, "David Eduardo" wrote:
wrote in message ps.com... I have no idea, how Univision could put up with someone, who spends 24/7 on message boards, or maybe he doesn't even work. I don't know how long it takes you to think through a brief response, but if I sepnd 30 minutes a day on Usenet, that's a lot. Last I checked, most people have 2/3 of the day and all the weekend free to do whatever they want... or about 128 hours of free time a week. His sole existence in life is to try and make others miserable ... no, only to those who post material that is not factual, such as your mistaken claims that AM news / talk stations get higher rates than FMs or that AM in general is prospering. - this IBOC shill would love to put an end to SW and AM DX'ers, to the sole gain of HD Radio/IBOC. This is the first time SW has come into0 the argument. I think SW of its own is dead in most of the world, and is certainly, being skywave based, not an apprpriate medium for HD. AM DXers are now very few in number, and hardly have any claim to skywave service when improving hte viability of AM at the local level is concerned. Hey, it's a hobby, not an essential service. To his displeasure, SW and analog AM will be around for many years, SW stations numbber perhaps half of the level of the 70's... AM is dying. In Canada, they have reduced the station count by nearly 60%. South Africa has no AMs left, etc. The listenership in the US dis down to a small level, mostly composed of people over 50. Folks under 40 very nearly do not listen at all to AM. as HD Radio/IBOC is failing on AM, and will just end up being a niche market for radio-geeks. Actually, the viable metro signals will all be HD. It does not matter what the marginal signals do, as they represent no listenership. Here is an interesting on- going poll by BMW owners, who are interested in buying either Sirius, or HD Radio: http://www.bimmerfest.com/forums/sho...d.php?t=152874 This shill realizes that for HD Radio/IBOC to succeed, in part, he needs to convince the radio-geeks - you would think by now, with all the hatred towards IBOC, he would have gotten a clue. He spreads the sames lies on radio-info.com. HD was just launched in 2006... and we all believe it to be a multi-year building process, not a quick fix. It may never fix AM, however, as the band is nearly dead. - Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - "In-Stat: Digital Radio Set to Take Off" "In 2006, 73 percent of respondents to an In-Stat U.S. consumer survey were aware of HD Radio on some level." http://beradio.com/eyeoniboc/instat-digital-radio-set/ "Sirius, XM, and HD: Consumer interest reality check" (Alexaholic) "While interest in satellite radio is diminishing, interest in HD shows no signs of a pulse." http://www.hear2.com/2007/02/sirius_....html#comments This just confirms, the lack of interest for HD Radio, on Google Trends: http://www.google.com/trends?q=%22hd... =all&date=all Taking off - HD Radio/IBOC has had its wings clipped ! ;-) |
David Eduardo - A Recent Conversation
On Feb 19, 9:10 am, "David Eduardo" wrote:
"Steve" wrote in message oups.com... We've seen him confused now about his own job title, A typo is not confusing to me. Apparently it is to you Lies apparently aren't confusing to you, either. his ethnicity Ethnically, I am Irish and Celt. There is no confusion there. Not on my part, but then I don't go around calling myself Eduardo. and now the citizenship of his daughter She is a born dual national, who never exercised her rights to American citizenship. Not exercising a right is not the same as not having it. No, they're not the same thing at all. So why did you earlier claim that she was an American citizen? --assuming that he in fact HAS a daughter. Actually, I have four. Evidence? I can only wonder why this guy is spending his time here, in this group. He needs a group that's about psychotherapy. That _would_ help me understand you and dxAss. Good idea. Don't worry about understanding us. Save that for later, when you're better. Right now, just concentrate on why you're compelled to tell outrageous lies about your self to anyone who'll listen. |
David Eduardo - A Recent Conversation
On Feb 19, 1:45?pm, "David Eduardo" wrote:
wrote in message ps.com... I have no idea, how Univision could put up with someone, who spends 24/7 on message boards, or maybe he doesn't even work. I don't know how long it takes you to think through a brief response, but if I sepnd 30 minutes a day on Usenet, that's a lot. Last I checked, most people have 2/3 of the day and all the weekend free to do whatever they want... or about 128 hours of free time a week. His sole existence in life is to try and make others miserable ... no, only to those who post material that is not factual, such as your mistaken claims that AM news / talk stations get higher rates than FMs or that AM in general is prospering. - this IBOC shill would love to put an end to SW and AM DX'ers, to the sole gain of HD Radio/IBOC. This is the first time SW has come into0 the argument. I think SW of its own is dead in most of the world, and is certainly, being skywave based, not an apprpriate medium for HD. AM DXers are now very few in number, and hardly have any claim to skywave service when improving hte viability of AM at the local level is concerned. Hey, it's a hobby, not an essential service. To his displeasure, SW and analog AM will be around for many years, SW stations numbber perhaps half of the level of the 70's... AM is dying. In Canada, they have reduced the station count by nearly 60%. South Africa has no AMs left, etc. The listenership in the US dis down to a small level, mostly composed of people over 50. Folks under 40 very nearly do not listen at all to AM. as HD Radio/IBOC is failing on AM, and will just end up being a niche market for radio-geeks. Actually, the viable metro signals will all be HD. It does not matter what the marginal signals do, as they represent no listenership. Here is an interesting on- going poll by BMW owners, who are interested in buying either Sirius, or HD Radio: http://www.bimmerfest.com/forums/sho...d.php?t=152874 This shill realizes that for HD Radio/IBOC to succeed, in part, he needs to convince the radio-geeks - you would think by now, with all the hatred towards IBOC, he would have gotten a clue. He spreads the sames lies on radio-info.com. HD was just launched in 2006... and we all believe it to be a multi-year building process, not a quick fix. It may never fix AM, however, as the band is nearly dead. - Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Yea shill, the AM band is so dead: http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/amq?state...2=&EW=W&size=9 I must admit, I have never seen anyone so full-of-**** ! :-) |
David Eduardo - A Recent Conversation
On Feb 19, 7:58 am, wrote:
On Feb 19, 1:45?pm, "David Eduardo" wrote: wrote in message ups.com... I have no idea, how Univision could put up with someone, who spends 24/7 on message boards, or maybe he doesn't even work. I don't know how long it takes you to think through a brief response, but if I sepnd 30 minutes a day on Usenet, that's a lot. Last I checked, most people have 2/3 of the day and all the weekend free to do whatever they want... or about 128 hours of free time a week. His sole existence in life is to try and make others miserable ... no, only to those who post material that is not factual, such as your mistaken claims that AM news / talk stations get higher rates than FMs or that AM in general is prospering. - this IBOC shill would love to put an end to SW and AM DX'ers, to the sole gain of HD Radio/IBOC. This is the first time SW has come into0 the argument. I think SW of its own is dead in most of the world, and is certainly, being skywave based, not an apprpriate medium for HD. AM DXers are now very few in number, and hardly have any claim to skywave service when improving hte viability of AM at the local level is concerned. Hey, it's a hobby, not an essential service. To his displeasure, SW and analog AM will be around for many years, SW stations numbber perhaps half of the level of the 70's... AM is dying. In Canada, they have reduced the station count by nearly 60%. South Africa has no AMs left, etc. The listenership in the US dis down to a small level, mostly composed of people over 50. Folks under 40 very nearly do not listen at all to AM. as HD Radio/IBOC is failing on AM, and will just end up being a niche market for radio-geeks. Actually, the viable metro signals will all be HD. It does not matter what the marginal signals do, as they represent no listenership. Here is an interesting on- going poll by BMW owners, who are interested in buying either Sirius, or HD Radio: http://www.bimmerfest.com/forums/sho...d.php?t=152874 This shill realizes that for HD Radio/IBOC to succeed, in part, he needs to convince the radio-geeks - you would think by now, with all the hatred towards IBOC, he would have gotten a clue. He spreads the sames lies on radio-info.com. HD was just launched in 2006... and we all believe it to be a multi-year building process, not a quick fix. It may never fix AM, however, as the band is nearly dead. - Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - News/talk/sports is alive-and-well on the "clears".- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - AM News/Talk/Sports is the Only-Game-in-Town on the little one AM Radio Station town of Sonora, CA. KVML-AM 1450 kHz = http://www.kvmlam.com/index.php SIGNAL = http://www.kvmlam.com/coveragemap.php "The Mother {Load} Lode's News Station" i b listening to the 'am' radio ~ RHF |
David Eduardo - A Recent Conversation
David Eduardo wrote: "Steve" wrote in message oups.com... We've seen him confused now about his own job title, A typo is not confusing to me. Apparently it is to you his ethnicity Ethnically, I am Irish and Celt. There is no confusion there. and now the citizenship of his daughter She is a born dual national, who never exercised her rights to American citizenship. Not exercising a right is not the same as not having it. Then why were you insisting that she had dual citizenship? |
David Eduardo - A Recent Conversation
On Feb 19, 1:45?pm, "David Eduardo" wrote:
wrote in message ps.com... I have no idea, how Univision could put up with someone, who spends 24/7 on message boards, or maybe he doesn't even work. I don't know how long it takes you to think through a brief response, but if I sepnd 30 minutes a day on Usenet, that's a lot. Last I checked, most people have 2/3 of the day and all the weekend free to do whatever they want... or about 128 hours of free time a week. His sole existence in life is to try and make others miserable ... no, only to those who post material that is not factual, such as your mistaken claims that AM news / talk stations get higher rates than FMs or that AM in general is prospering. - this IBOC shill would love to put an end to SW and AM DX'ers, to the sole gain of HD Radio/IBOC. This is the first time SW has come into0 the argument. I think SW of its own is dead in most of the world, and is certainly, being skywave based, not an apprpriate medium for HD. AM DXers are now very few in number, and hardly have any claim to skywave service when improving hte viability of AM at the local level is concerned. Hey, it's a hobby, not an essential service. To his displeasure, SW and analog AM will be around for many years, SW stations numbber perhaps half of the level of the 70's... AM is dying. In Canada, they have reduced the station count by nearly 60%. South Africa has no AMs left, etc. The listenership in the US dis down to a small level, mostly composed of people over 50. Folks under 40 very nearly do not listen at all to AM. as HD Radio/IBOC is failing on AM, and will just end up being a niche market for radio-geeks. Actually, the viable metro signals will all be HD. It does not matter what the marginal signals do, as they represent no listenership. Here is an interesting on- going poll by BMW owners, who are interested in buying either Sirius, or HD Radio: http://www.bimmerfest.com/forums/sho...d.php?t=152874 This shill realizes that for HD Radio/IBOC to succeed, in part, he needs to convince the radio-geeks - you would think by now, with all the hatred towards IBOC, he would have gotten a clue. He spreads the sames lies on radio-info.com. HD was just launched in 2006... and we all believe it to be a multi-year building process, not a quick fix. It may never fix AM, however, as the band is nearly dead. - Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - "In-Stat: Digital Radio Set to Take Off" "In 2006, 73 percent of respondents to an In-Stat U.S. consumer survey were aware of HD Radio on some level." http://beradio.com/eyeoniboc/instat-digital-radio-set/ "Sirius, XM, and HD: Consumer interest reality check" (Alexaholic) "While interest in satellite radio is diminishing, interest in HD shows no signs of a pulse." http://www.hear2.com/2007/02/sirius_....html#comments Alexaholic: 1) http://www.alexaholic.com/hdradio.com+/ 2) http://www.alexaholic.com/hdradio.com+ibiquity.com 3) http://www.alexaholic.com/hdradio.co...om+xmradio.com 4) http://www.alexaholic.com/hdradio.co...n.com+xbox.com Google Trends: 1) http://www.google.com/trends?q=%22hd+radio%22 2) http://www.google.com/trends?q=%22hd...22%2C+ibiquity 3) http://www.google.com/trends?q=%22hd... =all&date=all It's over, David - but, how can something be dead, when it wasn't even born ? :-) |
David Eduardo - A Recent Conversation
wrote in message oups.com... News/talk/sports is alive-and-well on the "clears". That's about 20 stations, all of which are declining in sales demos and billings. |
David Eduardo - A Recent Conversation
"Steve" wrote in message ups.com... On Feb 19, 9:10 am, "David Eduardo" wrote: "Steve" wrote in message oups.com... We've seen him confused now about his own job title, A typo is not confusing to me. Apparently it is to you Lies apparently aren't confusing to you, either. Again, a mistake by an industry association in a convention program is hardly an issue his ethnicity Ethnically, I am Irish and Celt. There is no confusion there. Not on my part, but then I don't go around calling myself Eduardo. As mentioned, it was my baptismal name... given to me by my godparents on that occasion. She is a born dual national, who never exercised her rights to American citizenship. Not exercising a right is not the same as not having it. No, they're not the same thing at all. So why did you earlier claim that she was an American citizen? She was at birth. At a later time, she exercised her right to choose the one she perferred. --assuming that he in fact HAS a daughter. Actually, I have four. Evidence? Why should you care? Anyway, one is an auditor trainer for PriceWaterhouse, another is the head of the Department of Education legal department in PR, another is stydying in Orlando and the 4th is in advertising and radio in Quito, Ecuador. I can only wonder why this guy is spending his time here, in this group. He needs a group that's about psychotherapy. That _would_ help me understand you and dxAss. Good idea. Don't worry about understanding us. Save that for later, when you're better. Right now, just concentrate on why you're compelled to tell outrageous lies about your self to anyone who'll listen. So far, no lie exists. I stated my elder daughter was born a dual national (she was Ecuadorian at birth is a true statement. She was American at birth was a true statement) and chose, later, which nation she would carry a passport from. Seems simple to me. |
David Eduardo - A Recent Conversation
wrote in message oups.com... Yea shill, the AM band is so dead: http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/amq?state...2=&EW=W&size=9 I must admit, I have never seen anyone so full-of-**** ! :-) You totally miss the main point: AM is declining in audience in the US, having less than 20% of what it had 40 years ago... Most AMs have an audience significantly based in over-55-year-olds, which agency advertisers do not want. Revenues are falling, and many successful AMs are looking to move their formats to FM to survive. Canada is eliminating all but a few AMs, and at least one province has no AMs at all any more. South Africa has no AMs. Most of Latin America has fewer AMs than 25 years ago, with the exception of Mexico which was always under-radioed due to NARBA. The share of listening by 12-34 year olds given to AM is less than 8%.... with 92% and over going to FM. |
David Eduardo - A Recent Conversation
"RHF" wrote in message ups.com... AM News/Talk/Sports is the Only-Game-in-Town on the little one AM Radio Station town of Sonora, CA. KVML-AM 1450 kHz = http://www.kvmlam.com/index.php SIGNAL = http://www.kvmlam.com/coveragemap.php "The Mother {Load} Lode's News Station" Clark Broadcasting would be interest in knowing what happened to it's Sonora-licensed FM, KZSQ. There are dozens of Jackson, Sacramento, Modesto and Stockton market stations that have viable signals in Sonora, and the market is part of the Sacramento DMA. |
David Eduardo - A Recent Conversation
"dxAce" wrote in message ... David Eduardo wrote: "Steve" wrote in message oups.com... We've seen him confused now about his own job title, A typo is not confusing to me. Apparently it is to you his ethnicity Ethnically, I am Irish and Celt. There is no confusion there. and now the citizenship of his daughter She is a born dual national, who never exercised her rights to American citizenship. Not exercising a right is not the same as not having it. Then why were you insisting that she had dual citizenship? By US law, and even by the information posted by a knowledgeable poster this morning, she does. She chose, however, not to use it Under the laws of her country, she is only Ecuadorian; apparently the US system sees it differently. |
David Eduardo - A Recent Conversation
On Feb 19, 11:40?pm, "David Eduardo" wrote:
wrote in message oups.com... News/talk/sports is alive-and-well on the "clears". That's about 20 stations, all of which are declining in sales demos and billings. That's bull****, shill: http://www.northpine.com/broadcast/50kwam.html Analog AM will be around for many years , long after HD Radio/IBOC has died - interesting, you never tried to counter my other posts. HD Radio/IBOC is already dead. |
David Eduardo - A Recent Conversation
wrote in message ups.com... On Feb 19, 11:40?pm, "David Eduardo" wrote: wrote in message oups.com... News/talk/sports is alive-and-well on the "clears". That's about 20 stations, all of which are declining in sales demos and billings. That's bull****, shill: There are only these (former designation) 1-A clears: KFI, WSM, WFAN, WSCR, WLW, WGN, WSB, WJR, WABC, WBBM, WBAP, WCCO, WHAS, WWL, WCBS, WLS, KDKA, WBZ, WHO, WTAM, KMOX, KSL, WHAM, WOAI, WPHT. 5 of them are not news talk, and all but KFI had declininng billings in 2006. http://www.northpine.com/broadcast/50kwam.html Many of these are 50 kw, but not major stations. Remember, about 2 kw on 540 covers more than 50 kw on 1580. Some of the ones on the list are true dogs, like KBLA and the 1580 in Phoenix. Analog AM will be around for many years , long after HD Radio/IBOC has died - interesting, you never tried to counter my other posts. HD Radio/IBOC is already dead. HD was mostly developed for FM, where over 1000 stations are on the air. A significant portion of major AMs in the US are on in HD. |
David Eduardo - A Recent Conversation
On Feb 19, 8:47 pm, "David Eduardo" wrote:
"Steve" wrote in message ups.com... On Feb 19, 9:10 am, "David Eduardo" wrote: "Steve" wrote in message groups.com... We've seen him confused now about his own job title, A typo is not confusing to me. Apparently it is to you Lies apparently aren't confusing to you, either. Again, a mistake by an industry association in a convention program is hardly an issue Their only mistake was taking you at your word. his ethnicity Ethnically, I am Irish and Celt. There is no confusion there. Not on my part, but then I don't go around calling myself Eduardo. As mentioned, it was my baptismal name... given to me by my godparents on that occasion. I suppose they also named you "President"? She is a born dual national, who never exercised her rights to American citizenship. Not exercising a right is not the same as not having it. But above you say she was never an American citizen. Better get your story straight. No, they're not the same thing at all. So why did you earlier claim that she was an American citizen? She was at birth. At a later time, she exercised her right to choose the one she perferred. --assuming that he in fact HAS a daughter. Actually, I have four. Evidence? Why should you care? Anyway, one is an auditor trainer for PriceWaterhouse, another is the head of the Department of Education legal department in PR, another is stydying in Orlando and the 4th is in advertising and radio in Quito, Ecuador. It's your claim, not mine. I can only wonder why this guy is spending his time here, in this group. He needs a group that's about psychotherapy. That _would_ help me understand you and dxAss. Good idea. Don't worry about understanding us. Save that for later, when you're better. Right now, just concentrate on why you're compelled to tell outrageous lies about your self to anyone who'll listen. So far, no lie exists. I stated my elder daughter was born a dual national (she was Ecuadorian at birth is a true statement. She was American at birth was a true statement) and chose, later, which nation she would carry a passport from. Seems simple to me. "David Eduardo: ...She has never been a US citizen. " |
David Eduardo - A Recent Conversation
On Feb 19, 6:01 pm, "David Eduardo" wrote:
"dxAce" wrote in message ... David Eduardo wrote: "Steve" wrote in message groups.com... We've seen him confused now about his own job title, A typo is not confusing to me. Apparently it is to you his ethnicity Ethnically, I am Irish and Celt. There is no confusion there. and now the citizenship of his daughter She is a born dual national, who never exercised her rights to American citizenship. Not exercising a right is not the same as not having it. Then why were you insisting that she had dual citizenship? By US law, and even by the information posted by a knowledgeable poster this morning, she does. She chose, however, not to use it Under the laws of her country, she is only Ecuadorian; apparently the US system sees it differently.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - DE, Q # 1. First - Was her Mother also an American ? - - - Usually -if- noth Parents are Native Born Americans {Physically Born in the USA} - You Are An "America-by-Birth-Right". Example - As Lee Harvey Oswald's life illustrates the US Government generally 'views' Native-Born-Americans as Americans-for-Life. Q # 2. Or - Was her Mother 'other-than' an American ? Q # 2a Is she now over the Age of 21 Years ? IIRC -if- she 'never' exercised the Privilege-of-America-Citizenship before or upon turning the Age of 21 years - - - She may have 'lost' that "Privilege" {Option}. the law is a complicated thing . . . which naturally confuses me ~ RHF http://www.subgenius.com/ http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Church_of_the_SubGenius |
David Eduardo - A Recent Conversation
On Feb 19, 5:59 pm, "David Eduardo" wrote:
"RHF" wrote in message ups.com... AM News/Talk/Sports is the Only-Game-in-Town on the little one AM Radio Station town of Sonora, CA. KVML-AM 1450 kHz =http://www.kvmlam.com/index.php SIGNAL =http://www.kvmlam.com/coveragemap.php "The Mother {Load} Lode's News Station" Clark Broadcasting would be interest in knowing what happened to it's Sonora-licensed FM, KZSQ. There are dozens of Jackson, Sacramento, Modesto and Stockton market stations that have viable signals in Sonora, and the market is part of the Sacramento DMA. DE - But I do AM News/Talk Radio and KVML carries the "Local Weather" and in the Winter up here in the Foothills of the Sierras "Knowing-the-Weather" at all times is very important. The 'old' KKBN-FM before it was bought by Clark was a "Good" 'local' Twain Harte Radio Station. But now is part of the mix that Clark owns and operates locally. un-chain-my-tires : let me drive snow free ~ RHF |
David Eduardo - A Recent Conversation
On Feb 19, 5:54 pm, "David Eduardo" wrote:
wrote in message oups.com... Yea shill, the AM band is so dead: http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/amq?state...freq=530&fre2=... I must admit, I have never seen anyone so full-of-**** ! :-) You totally miss the main point: AM is declining in audience in the US, having less than 20% of what it had 40 years ago... Most AMs have an audience significantly based in over-55-year-olds, which agency advertisers do not want. Revenues are falling, and many successful AMs are looking to move their formats to FM to survive. Canada is eliminating all but a few AMs, and at least one province has no AMs at all any more. South Africa has no AMs. Most of Latin America has fewer AMs than 25 years ago, with the exception of Mexico which was always under-radioed due to NARBA. DE - NARBA ? ? ? ~ RHF North American Radio Broadcasting Agreement -Cirica 1941- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/North_A...ting_Agreement NARBA "Clear Channel" AM/MW Radio Stations http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clear_channel AM/MW Station Classes : Clear, Regional, and Local Channels http://www.fcc.gov/mb/audio/amclasses.html BIG USA, Mexico, and Canadian AM/MW Radio Stations -compiled by- AC6V http://www.ac6v.com/clearam.htm MAP - Night-Time AM/MW 50 KW Powerhouses in the USA http://www.fortunecity.com/tinpan/bl...rp/amradio.htm READ - AM Radio Station Info : Radio-Locator + FCC + Where's That Station + AM {Medium Wave} DXing + Prime Time Shortwave + NASWA WWW Shortwave Listening Guide and a lot more . . . http://groups.google.com/group/rec.r...34e3c158b06fa5 and now i know ~ RHF |
David Eduardo - A Recent Conversation
"RHF" wrote in message ups.com... Q # 1. First - Was her Mother also an American ? - - - Usually -if- noth Parents are Native Born Americans {Physically Born in the USA} - You Are An "America-by-Birth-Right". Example - As Lee Harvey Oswald's life illustrates the US Government generally 'views' Native-Born-Americans as Americans-for-Life. Her mother is Ecuadorian. Under US law, she was a dual national at birth. By Ecuadorian law, she was not a citizen of any country until age 18, when she became Ecuadorian. Obviously, each country has different laws or rules. That's what makes this interesting beyond the personal aspect. Q # 2. Or - Was her Mother 'other-than' an American ? Ecuadorian. Q # 2a Is she now over the Age of 21 Years ? Read the thread. She was born in the mid-60's. IIRC -if- she 'never' exercised the Privilege-of-America-Citizenship before or upon turning the Age of 21 years - - - She may have 'lost' that "Privilege" {Option}. Majority in ecuador is 18, not 21. And under local law in the naiton where she lives, getting an Ecuadrian passport required an "acta" certifying she renounced any other citizenship. Since she has not tried to live in the US or become a citizen, I don't know what the outcome would be were she to try to recover her US citizenship of birth. the law is a complicated thing . . . which naturally confuses me ~ RHF It confuses all of us in this case, as the laws of two nations are not the same. |
David Eduardo - A Recent Conversation
"RHF" wrote in message oups.com... On Feb 19, 5:54 pm, "David Eduardo" wrote: wrote in message oups.com... Yea shill, the AM band is so dead: http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/amq?state...freq=530&fre2=... I must admit, I have never seen anyone so full-of-**** ! :-) You totally miss the main point: AM is declining in audience in the US, having less than 20% of what it had 40 years ago... Most AMs have an audience significantly based in over-55-year-olds, which agency advertisers do not want. Revenues are falling, and many successful AMs are looking to move their formats to FM to survive. Canada is eliminating all but a few AMs, and at least one province has no AMs at all any more. South Africa has no AMs. Most of Latin America has fewer AMs than 25 years ago, with the exception of Mexico which was always under-radioed due to NARBA. DE - NARBA ? ? ? ~ RHF North American Radio Broadcasting Agreement -Cirica 1941- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/North_A...ting_Agreement NARBA "Clear Channel" AM/MW Radio Stations http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clear_channel AM/MW Station Classes : Clear, Regional, and Local Channels http://www.fcc.gov/mb/audio/amclasses.html BIG USA, Mexico, and Canadian AM/MW Radio Stations -compiled by- AC6V http://www.ac6v.com/clearam.htm MAP - Night-Time AM/MW 50 KW Powerhouses in the USA http://www.fortunecity.com/tinpan/bl...rp/amradio.htm Your point is? There are many 50 kw stations, but only a few are the original 50 kw Class 1-A clears. and not all are news /talk, either. Many of the remaining 50's are either directional, lower power at night or both... many can not even cover their own full local market. A good example is the former WTOP, a 50 kw AM in DC... that needed several AM and FM repeaters to cover the DC market incompletely. They moved to FM last year, and are doing much better now. |
David Eduardo - A Recent Conversation
On Feb 19, 10:22 pm, "RHF" wrote:
On Feb 19, 6:01 pm, "David Eduardo" wrote: "dxAce" wrote in message ... David Eduardo wrote: "Steve" wrote in message groups.com... We've seen him confused now about his own job title, A typo is not confusing to me. Apparently it is to you his ethnicity Ethnically, I am Irish and Celt. There is no confusion there. and now the citizenship of his daughter She is a born dual national, who never exercised her rights to American citizenship. Not exercising a right is not the same as not having it. Then why were you insisting that she had dual citizenship? By US law, and even by the information posted by a knowledgeable poster this morning, she does. She chose, however, not to use it Under the laws of her country, she is only Ecuadorian; apparently the US system sees it differently.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - DE, Q # 1. First - Was her Mother also an American ? - - - Usually -if- noth Parents are Native Born Americans {Physically Born in the USA} - You Are An "America-by-Birth-Right". That's true as long as at least one of the parents has resided in the US at some time in their lives. When only one parent is a US citizen, then the requirements for passing citizenship to the child vary depending on whether the parents were married at the time of the birth, as well as how much physical presence the US citizen parent had, in the US, prior to the birth. The required amount of physical presence has changed over the years. It should be noted that IF the requirements for citizenship are met, then the child is automatically a US citizen from birth. It's not an option that they can choose to take if they wish. Q # 2. Or - Was her Mother 'other-than' an American ? Q # 2a Is she now over the Age of 21 Years ? IIRC -if- she 'never' exercised the Privilege-of-America-Citizenship before or upon turning the Age of 21 years - - - She may have 'lost' that "Privilege" {Option}. There is no requirement to exercise US citizenship by the age of 21 in order to keep it. There was, prior to 1978, a requirement for a US citizen born abroad of US parentage to move to the US and live there for at least five years by age 28, in order to preserve their US citizenship. But that law was repealed in 1978. It wouldn't have affected anyone who didn't reach their 28th birthday by then. |
David Eduardo - A Recent Conversation
David Eduardo wrote: "dxAce" wrote in message ... David Eduardo wrote: "Steve" wrote in message oups.com... We've seen him confused now about his own job title, A typo is not confusing to me. Apparently it is to you his ethnicity Ethnically, I am Irish and Celt. There is no confusion there. and now the citizenship of his daughter She is a born dual national, who never exercised her rights to American citizenship. Not exercising a right is not the same as not having it. Then why were you insisting that she had dual citizenship? By US law, and even by the information posted by a knowledgeable poster this morning, she does. She chose, however, not to use it Under the laws of her country, she is only Ecuadorian; apparently the US system sees it differently. As do you, a known pathological liar. Run along, boy. dxAce Michigan USA |
David Eduardo - A Recent Conversation
wrote in message oups.com... On Feb 19, 10:22 pm, "RHF" wrote: It should be noted that IF the requirements for citizenship are met, then the child is automatically a US citizen from birth. It's not an option that they can choose to take if they wish. It is, in Ecuador. Or, at least, questionable. In the 70's and 80's, upon becoming a citizen at 18, the age of majority, any "dual national" (a concept not then recognized there) had to sign an act by which they renounced any other allegiances. Given that "swearing an oath" to another naiton or "renouncing" U.S. citizenship were even prohibited in the introduction to each US passport at the time, there is weven a grey area in US law (it is still, in modified form, parts 2 and 4 of "Loss of Citizenship" in my 1997 passport). As mentioned, many Latin American countries consider children to age 18 to be nationals but not citizens. Citizenship is generally conferred at the age of majority, usually 18. Q # 2. Or - Was her Mother 'other-than' an American ? Q # 2a Is she now over the Age of 21 Years ? IIRC -if- she 'never' exercised the Privilege-of-America-Citizenship before or upon turning the Age of 21 years - - - She may have 'lost' that "Privilege" {Option}. There is no requirement to exercise US citizenship by the age of 21 in order to keep it. The age of majority in Ecuador is 18, and to become a citizen (which one is not up to 18, no matter who the parents are) one had to renounce all other allegiances, as I said above. Such constitutes both an oath to Ecuador and a renunciation of other citizenships... While US law may be more tolerant, Ecuadorian law at the time was not. Thus, we have a dichotomy: The US may consider the person a citizen and a dual national , while Ecuador does not. This may be an example of how one nation allows dual nationals and another does not... for the same person! There was, prior to 1978, a requirement for a US citizen born abroad of US parentage to move to the US and live there for at least five years by age 28, in order to preserve their US citizenship. But that law was repealed in 1978. It wouldn't have affected anyone who didn't reach their 28th birthday by then. |
David Eduardo - A Recent Conversation
"dxAce" wrote in message ... David Eduardo wrote: "dxAce" wrote in message ... David Eduardo wrote: "Steve" wrote in message oups.com... We've seen him confused now about his own job title, A typo is not confusing to me. Apparently it is to you his ethnicity Ethnically, I am Irish and Celt. There is no confusion there. and now the citizenship of his daughter She is a born dual national, who never exercised her rights to American citizenship. Not exercising a right is not the same as not having it. Then why were you insisting that she had dual citizenship? By US law, and even by the information posted by a knowledgeable poster this morning, she does. She chose, however, not to use it Under the laws of her country, she is only Ecuadorian; apparently the US system sees it differently. As do you, a known pathological liar. Please see Mr. Gallagher's very informative posts in regards to US immigration law on dual nationals born abroad of one US parent. I defer to him on the US law part of the discussion, as he obviously knows more than you or I do. |
David Eduardo - A Recent Conversation
David Eduardo wrote: "Steve" wrote in message ups.com... On Feb 19, 9:10 am, "David Eduardo" wrote: "Steve" wrote in message oups.com... We've seen him confused now about his own job title, A typo is not confusing to me. Apparently it is to you Lies apparently aren't confusing to you, either. Again, a mistake by an industry association in a convention program is hardly an issue his ethnicity Ethnically, I am Irish and Celt. There is no confusion there. Not on my part, but then I don't go around calling myself Eduardo. As mentioned, it was my baptismal name... given to me by my godparents on that occasion. Wait! Didn't you say in the past that it was given to you by your Mother at your baptism? At any rate, here is a quote from August 20, 2006 in alt.politics.immigration: "Funny, because I was baptized in 1947 and "Eduardo" is a name my mother liked from the time she lived in Europe." I guess your godparents liked it too. Myself, I would have baptized you 'Stupido'. |
David Eduardo - A Recent Conversation
David Eduardo wrote: "Steve" wrote in message ups.com... Again, a mistake by an industry association in a convention program is hardly an issue Their only mistake was taking you at your word. Very funny. They simply misprinted my title in a program. When a convention has 10,000 attendees and about 300 different speakers and panelists, many errors happen. Nobody int he industry gave it a second thought. As mentioned, it was my baptismal name... given to me by my godparents on that occasion. I suppose they also named you "President"? And your point is? You don't like the name? Tough. She is a born dual national, who never exercised her rights to American citizenship. Not exercising a right is not the same as not having it. But above you say she was never an American citizen. Better get your story straight. It is perfectly straight. She was born a US citizen, under US law. Under Ecuadorian law, she was not a citizen until age 18 (many Latin American nations do not consider people citizens until they reach the age of majority... including Mexico, I believe). At age 18, she got an Ecuadorian passport, sufficient in ecuador to be considereed ONLY an Ecuadorian national. US law saw her as a dual national. So far, no lie exists. I stated my elder daughter was born a dual national (she was Ecuadorian at birth is a true statement. She was American at birth was a true statement) and chose, later, which nation she would carry a passport from. Seems simple to me. "David Eduardo: ...She has never been a US citizen. " Correct. She had a right to citizenship, but lived in Ecuador where she did not exercise it. She swore citizenship to Ecuador at age 18; one country considers here only a national, and the other considers her a dual national. In other words, there are two answers to this question, depending on whose laws you folow. Spin machine working overtime once again, Edweenie? LMFAO at the pathological liar. |
David Eduardo - A Recent Conversation
David Frackelton Gleason, retard boy at Univision, and posing daily as 'Eduardo' damn near spun himself into the ground when he wrote: "dxAce" wrote in message ... David Eduardo wrote: "dxAce" wrote in message ... David Eduardo wrote: "Steve" wrote in message oups.com... We've seen him confused now about his own job title, A typo is not confusing to me. Apparently it is to you his ethnicity Ethnically, I am Irish and Celt. There is no confusion there. and now the citizenship of his daughter She is a born dual national, who never exercised her rights to American citizenship. Not exercising a right is not the same as not having it. Then why were you insisting that she had dual citizenship? By US law, and even by the information posted by a knowledgeable poster this morning, she does. She chose, however, not to use it Under the laws of her country, she is only Ecuadorian; apparently the US system sees it differently. As do you, a known pathological liar. Please see Mr. Gallagher's very informative posts in regards to US immigration law on dual nationals born abroad of one US parent. I defer to him on the US law part of the discussion, as he obviously knows more than you or I do. We're not talking about US law, boy. We're talking about you being a pathological liar. Stop the obfuscation. |
David Eduardo - A Recent Conversation
"dxAce" wrote in message ... David Eduardo wrote: "Steve" wrote in message ups.com... On Feb 19, 9:10 am, "David Eduardo" wrote: "Steve" wrote in message oups.com... We've seen him confused now about his own job title, A typo is not confusing to me. Apparently it is to you Lies apparently aren't confusing to you, either. Again, a mistake by an industry association in a convention program is hardly an issue his ethnicity Ethnically, I am Irish and Celt. There is no confusion there. Not on my part, but then I don't go around calling myself Eduardo. As mentioned, it was my baptismal name... given to me by my godparents on that occasion. Wait! Didn't you say in the past that it was given to you by your Mother at your baptism? Correct. My mother selected the name, and the godparents "gave it" at the ceremony... as in "they gave the response" That's the way it is done. The priest asks the godparents, "and what name have you selected..." and the godparents respond. The person who decided on the name can be the parents, or the whole family, I suppose. In my case, it was my mother... who used a name she liked from when she lived in Europe whjich was, as required, also the name of a saint. At any rate, here is a quote from August 20, 2006 in alt.politics.immigration: "Funny, because I was baptized in 1947 and "Eduardo" is a name my mother liked from the time she lived in Europe." I guess your godparents liked it too. Myself, I would have baptized you 'Stupido'. You don't understand the baptism ceremony, obviously. When my daughters were baptized, a saint's name was added to the first given name... such as Jennifer Anne Altieri Gleason, and so on. In this case, the parents decided, and the grandparents answered the responsorial question as was the custom. The fact that the godparents give a response does not mean they made the decision, although they could have been given the honor if the family had wanted. You make an issue out of the simplest things. |
David Eduardo - A Recent Conversation
On Feb 20, 12:09?pm, "David Eduardo" wrote:
"dxAce" wrote in message ... David Eduardo wrote: "Steve" wrote in message roups.com... On Feb 19, 9:10 am, "David Eduardo" wrote: "Steve" wrote in message groups.com... We've seen him confused now about his own job title, A typo is not confusing to me. Apparently it is to you Lies apparently aren't confusing to you, either. Again, a mistake by an industry association in a convention program is hardly an issue his ethnicity Ethnically, I am Irish and Celt. There is no confusion there. Not on my part, but then I don't go around calling myself Eduardo. As mentioned, it was my baptismal name... given to me by my godparents on that occasion. Wait! Didn't you say in the past that it was given to you by your Mother at your baptism? Correct. My mother selected the name, and the godparents "gave it" at the ceremony... as in "they gave the response" That's the way it is done. The priest asks the godparents, "and what name have you selected..." and the godparents respond. The person who decided on the name can be the parents, or the whole family, I suppose. In my case, it was my mother... who used a name she liked from when she lived in Europe whjich was, as required, also the name of a saint. At any rate, here is a quote from August 20, 2006 in alt.politics.immigration: "Funny, because I was baptized in 1947 and "Eduardo" is a name my mother liked from the time she lived in Europe." I guess your godparents liked it too. Myself, I would have baptized you 'Stupido'. You don't understand the baptism ceremony, obviously. When my daughters were baptized, a saint's name was added to the first given name... such as Jennifer Anne Altieri Gleason, and so on. In this case, the parents decided, and the grandparents answered the responsorial question as was the custom. The fact that the godparents give a response does not mean they made the decision, although they could have been given the honor if the family had wanted. You make an issue out of the simplest things.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - How stupid are you ? You post all this personal information on the Internet, then provide a link to your Web site: http://davidgleason.com/ |
David Eduardo - A Recent Conversation
David Eduardo wrote: "dxAce" wrote in message ... David Eduardo wrote: "Steve" wrote in message ups.com... On Feb 19, 9:10 am, "David Eduardo" wrote: "Steve" wrote in message oups.com... We've seen him confused now about his own job title, A typo is not confusing to me. Apparently it is to you Lies apparently aren't confusing to you, either. Again, a mistake by an industry association in a convention program is hardly an issue his ethnicity Ethnically, I am Irish and Celt. There is no confusion there. Not on my part, but then I don't go around calling myself Eduardo. As mentioned, it was my baptismal name... given to me by my godparents on that occasion. Wait! Didn't you say in the past that it was given to you by your Mother at your baptism? Correct. My mother selected the name, and the godparents "gave it" at the ceremony... as in "they gave the response" That's the way it is done. The priest asks the godparents, "and what name have you selected..." and the godparents respond. The person who decided on the name can be the parents, or the whole family, I suppose. In my case, it was my mother... who used a name she liked from when she lived in Europe whjich was, as required, also the name of a saint. At any rate, here is a quote from August 20, 2006 in alt.politics.immigration: "Funny, because I was baptized in 1947 and "Eduardo" is a name my mother liked from the time she lived in Europe." I guess your godparents liked it too. Myself, I would have baptized you 'Stupido'. You don't understand the baptism ceremony, obviously. When my daughters were baptized, a saint's name was added to the first given name... such as Jennifer Anne Altieri Gleason, and so on. In this case, the parents decided, and the grandparents answered the responsorial question as was the custom. The fact that the godparents give a response does not mean they made the decision, although they could have been given the honor if the family had wanted. You make an issue out of the simplest things. Yes, because in your case it's merely fabrication! Keep spinning, boy. dxAce Michigan USA |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:28 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com