| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Mar 4, 6:23�pm, "David Eduardo" wrote:
wrote in message ups.com... On Mar 4, 5:56?pm, "David Eduardo" wrote: You have no idea, who I talked with Nobody in management is in on a Sunday morning. That is about the lowest rung on the radio ladder. - he said, over 50 years, not just 50. He knew, what he was talking about. Compared to you, Clarabelle the Cow knows more about radio. At-any-rate, you let me know, when all the US and Canadian AMs go dark, because I will only be out of a hobby, and you will be out of a job, if you are even employed by Univision. I won´t be out of a job. AM is a tiny part of our mainland business, and has no relevence to my emplyment. AM is decreasing in audience share every year, and it is mostly made up of over-55 listeners no advertiser wants. It is dying. *Broadcast radio has not grown in six years and HD/IBOC is a joke and will not save radio. FM has grown every year in revenue and the sector I am in has been up an average of over 6% a year for over a decade. Consumers have no interest in radio, especially HD. Even your own peers, laugh at the mention of HD - you are a joke, and HD is a joke. The Internet is making broadcast radio obsolete, including yourself. The RIAA killed the internet as a source of music streaming last week. Even companies like Pandora will lose twice as much on every user as they can make in advertising at web-standard CPMs... HD is ahead of schedule on models, price points and usefulness. Everyone in management and programming I have talked to is happy with it. They can broadcast all they want in HD, and make all the HD radios they want, but consumers are not interested: "Sirius, XM, and HD: Consumer interest reality check" "Finally, note the traffic for HDRadio.com which, although not a destination on the order of Sirius or XM, is the go-to site for further information about HD in many HD radio ads and promotions and is, thus, a good metric to gauge consumer interest. To the degree that these estimates are correct (Alexa isn't perfect) and to the degree that web traffic is a proxy for consumer interest, it looks like a long and slow race to the bottom. While interest in satellite radio is diminishing, interest in HD shows no signs of a pulse." http://www.hear2.com/2007/02/sirius_xm_and_h.html Stations are not dropping AM, just simulcasting on FM to fill holes in their coverage, but that is no given: "McDowell: Broadcasters Will Likely Be Pleased by FCC Action on FM Translators for AM Stations - But One AM Doesn't Wait" "At yesterday's NAB Leadership Conference in Washington, FCC Commissioner Robert McDowell stated that he thought that broadcasters would be pleased with the outcome of the Commission's action on the NAB proposal to allow AM stations to use FM translators to fill in holes in their coverage, or to provide nighttime coverage for daytime stations... While it is good news that the FCC seems to be moving on the NAB proposal, broadcasters should not think that relief for all AM stations is coming soon. Instead, the FCC will simply release a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, opening a formal comment window in which parties can state their support for the proposal. There may be others who oppose the proposal - particularly the supporters of Low Power FM stations. Given that the FCC already has an open proceeding dealing with the relationship between FM translators and LPFM stations, the proposal to give AM operators FM translators will have to be linked in some way to this other proceeding. And, were the FCC to decide that LPFM stations have a priority over FM translators, any victory for AM stations might be hollow, as LPFM stations could preclude the operation of many FM translators." http://www.broadcastlawblog.com/arch...esnt-wait.html Once again, you are a proven lier ! |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|