In article ,
"David Eduardo" wrote:

"Telamon" wrote in message
...

The US census definition does not define descent. It simply defines a
culture which may or may not be related to part of Latin America and
Spain... it also includes US Hispanics who are many generations removed
from
any specific other nation.

I don not see where DxAce referred to the US census.


No, he just pulled his own definition out of some orifice.

Now that was not very nice.

--
Telamon
Ventura, California

"Telamon" wrote in message
...
In article ,
"David Eduardo" wrote:

"Telamon" wrote in message
...

The US census definition does not define descent. It simply defines a
culture which may or may not be related to part of Latin America and
Spain... it also includes US Hispanics who are many generations
removed
from
any specific other nation.

I don not see where DxAce referred to the US census.


No, he just pulled his own definition out of some orifice.

Now that was not very nice.

Neither is dxAss, the bigot.

Telamon wrote:

In article ,
"David Eduardo" wrote:


"Telamon" wrote in message
...

The US census definition does not define descent. It simply defines a
culture which may or may not be related to part of Latin America and
Spain... it also includes US Hispanics who are many generations removed
from
any specific other nation.

I don not see where DxAce referred to the US census.


No, he just pulled his own definition out of some orifice.


Now that was not very nice.

How come you don't say that when DxAce verbally abuses someone? You were
silent during his recent profanity spree.

On Mar 6, 2:26 pm, "David Eduardo" wrote:
"Tester" wrote in message

g...





On Sat, 03 Mar 2007 10:57:11 -0500, dxAce
wrote:

wrote:

"Should Country stations specifically chase Hispanics?"

http://www.hear2.com/2007/03/should_....html#comments

Beats me - ask the fake Hispanic Eduardo.

I really feel that those Spanish only stations in the USofA should be
required
to air at least 60% English so as to help *assimilate* the invaders.

FYI, rhe primary PBS station in the New York City area today started a
Spanish secondary digital channel, displacing an English digital
channel from some cable systems.

http://www.thirteen.org/homepage/pro...ouncement.html

Of course, illegals working minimum wage or less probably are not
watching a digital TV channel of any variety.

In New York, over half the Hispanic adult population consists of Puerto
Ricans, and there are no illegal Puerto Ricans.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

DE,

Now come on lets be realistic there are plenty
of Puerto Ricans involved in Illegal Activities.

FYI - If they were born in Puerto Rico then they are
Puerto Rican. However -if- they were Born in New
York City, NY, USofA then they are Americans [.]

birth-and-birth-rights - they are both natural things ~ RHF

On Mar 6, 2:54 pm, "David Eduardo" wrote:
"dxAce" wrote in message

...







David Eduardo wrote:

"Tester" wrote in message
news:sbtou25e6n6r8ufdssvvp6ma1dlsvfg8kg@entropy. org...
On Sat, 03 Mar 2007 10:57:11 -0500, dxAce
wrote:

wrote:

"Should Country stations specifically chase Hispanics?"

http://www.hear2.com/2007/03/should_....html#comments

Beats me - ask the fake Hispanic Eduardo.

I really feel that those Spanish only stations in the USofA should be
required
to air at least 60% English so as to help *assimilate* the invaders.

FYI, rhe primary PBS station in the New York City area today started a
Spanish secondary digital channel, displacing an English digital
channel from some cable systems.

http://www.thirteen.org/homepage/pro...ouncement.html

Of course, illegals working minimum wage or less probably are not
watching a digital TV channel of any variety.

In New York, over half the Hispanic adult population consists of Puerto
Ricans, and there are no illegal Puerto Ricans.

So then is the other half illegal?

No, I was just pointing out that fully half of the Hispanic population could
not be illegal because it is Puerto Rican. The previous poster seemed to be
trying to suggest that _all_ Hispanics are illegal, which, of course is not
true and which, in NY, is even less true.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

DE,

Gee you are really forgeting the Generations of Hispanics
who were born and raised right here in the USofA to start
with. Oops - I forgot they most often speak english and
do not listen to your Spanish Only Radio Broadcasts.

oh never mind. ~ RHF

David Eduardo wrote:

"Telamon" wrote in message
...
In article ,
"David Eduardo" wrote:


"dxAce" wrote in message
...


David Eduardo wrote:

"dxAce" wrote in message
...


Run along now... and spin some salsa.


Salsa is Puerto Rican. There is no such thing as a Puerto Rican
illegal immigrant.

But there is such a thing as a dumbass retard from Cleveland!
You're not Hispanic, you're not a Puerto Rican, you're not a
Mexican and you're not an Ecuadorian.

Hispanic is not a nationality.

If you read what he posted he said it was a "shtik" and nowhere used the
term "nationality" so if you think those terms are the same then we are
using different dictionaries.

Ecuadorian, Puerto Rican and Mexican are nationalities... to which dxAss was
making comparisons. "Hispanic" is a culture, and may be acquired by life
experience.

Or by simply adopting it as a shtik as you did c.2000.

dxAce
Michigan
USA

David Eduardo wrote:

"Telamon" wrote in message
...

The US census definition does not define descent. It simply defines a
culture which may or may not be related to part of Latin America and
Spain... it also includes US Hispanics who are many generations removed
from
any specific other nation.

I don not see where DxAce referred to the US census.


No, he just pulled his own definition out of some orifice.

Wait, that's what you do, Edweenie. And we all know which orifice that is!

David Eduardo wrote:

"dxAce" wrote in message
...


Or by simply adopting it as a shtik as you did c.2000.


Of course, this is just conjecture on your part based on the "highly
credible" evidence of checking news group postings.

Oh, I've certainly checked other things as well... and it is indeed a shtik that
you adopted c.2000.

Stuff it.

No, you stuff it, boy. It's what you seem to like.

David Eduardo wrote:

"dxAce" wrote in message
...


David Eduardo wrote:

"Telamon" wrote in message
...

The US census definition does not define descent. It simply defines a
culture which may or may not be related to part of Latin America and
Spain... it also includes US Hispanics who are many generations
removed
from
any specific other nation.

I don not see where DxAce referred to the US census.


No, he just pulled his own definition out of some orifice.

Wait, that's what you do, Edweenie. And we all know which orifice that is!

Yeah, we got a short course in vulgarity from you over the weekend while you
were on your meds.

Meanwhile we're getting the long course from you on how great QRM is!

In article ,
David Eduardo wrote:

"Mark Zenier" wrote in message
...
In article ,
David Eduardo wrote:

KIRO, 50 kw in Seattle, is going to move to FM.

Er, didn't Bonneville sell KIRO to Entercom years ago?

And they just bought it back via a trade for the Bonneville San Francisco
staitons.

Google, google, google. Yup, there it is in the Seattle PI, but The
Seattle Times didn't report anything about that I could find. Damn,
that's wierd. The Times has always been a bit quirky about giving
publicity to what they regard as the competition. And with Craig's
List kicking the crap out of the Classified Ads, the daily papers are
in a money bind (with nothing I see to replace them).

Anyway, it'll go over like a lead balloon. FM in Western Washington ends
up full of holes. (I live in one of them). There's a lot of rolling
hills and they can't get a transmitter high enough to fill in the shadows.

Bonneville is betting on FM for the future of news talk, having made moves
in DC, Phoenix and Salt Lake already. It may be a simulcast, but they need
the FM to get the sales demos... AM is increasingly over-55 and hard to
impossible to sell.

So KJR-FM (or whatever it's real call letters are) gets a format change.
No loss, there's a zillion oldies stations here. A lot less TV commercials,
for that station, too.

Question: do all those TV commercials cost cash, or is it usually some
sort of ad time swap deal between the two broadcast companies?

Mark Zenier
Googleproofaddress(account:mzenier provider:eskimo domain:com)