Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Telamon" wrote in message ... In article , "David Eduardo" wrote: "Telamon" wrote in message ... In article , "David Eduardo" wrote: "Telamon" wrote in message . .. In article , "HD Radio²" wrote: A New Prototype Chip Provides Hope That Portable HD Radio Receivers Will Be on Store Shelves Soon Gee, what a thing to hang your hopes on 90% savings in power eliminates the only obstacle to portable HD devices, and the integrated chip makes very small HD devices practical. 90% savings over the power hogs that have been the table top HD radios so far means that the HD portable will still suck more power than a similar analog radio. But less than an iPod, which is the benchmark here. Maybe it is your bench mark. Most people will compare it to an analog radio. Actually, in the real world, they won't. The standard for battery life is determined by the iPod among today's consumers. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Eye-On-IBOC - Looking for Information about IBOC and HD Radio | Shortwave | |||
With-Respect-To : IBOC AM Radio -vice- AM Radio DXing | Shortwave | |||
With-Respect-To : IBOC AM Radio -vice- AM Radio DXing | Shortwave | |||
With-Respect-To : IBOC AM Radio -vice- AM Radio DXing | Shortwave | |||
With-Respect-To : IBOC AM Radio -vice- AM Radio DXing | Shortwave |