Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #81   Report Post  
Old March 9th 07, 09:02 PM posted to rec.radio.shortwave
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jun 2006
Posts: 8,861
Default WLW AM ranked #1

Or that photo of big old fat naked Santa sitting in that golf cart that
Texas Star woman sent out yesterday.
cuhulin

  #82   Report Post  
Old March 9th 07, 09:58 PM posted to rec.radio.shortwave
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jun 2006
Posts: 8,861
Default WLW AM ranked #1

Screw their ratings/rankins Bull ****! No single Radio station on Earth
is # 1.
cuhulin

  #83   Report Post  
Old March 10th 07, 08:31 AM posted to rec.radio.shortwave
RHF RHF is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jun 2006
Posts: 8,652
Default WLW AM ranked #1

On Mar 9, 7:46 am, "David Eduardo" wrote:
"RHF" wrote in message

oups.com...







This is a Valid Static When . . . {Drum Roll Please ! ! !}
51% of the AM Radio Listeners to these AM{HD} Radio
Stations Have AM {HD} Radios +and+ Are Listening to
AM {HD} Radio Broadcasts.
.
However =IF= These AM Radio Listeners are in-fact 'still'
Listening to AM Radio Stations with : AM {Analog} Radios
+and+ Are Listening to AM {Analog} Radio Broadcasts.
.
It All Means Nothing "Nada" [.] {FYI - Thats A Big Period}
.
Numb3rs Have Meaning -and- Are Often Meaningless ~ RHF
.
This Comes from That Place {Both Near and Far}
Where Everything Adds Up to Nothing . . .
[ Die Grosse Welt Von Nichts ]


- What it means is that the owners of the major AMs
- know that they must do something to change AM...
- either HD or move the format to FM.

The later would seam to be the better 'choice'

Long Term IBOC FM "HD" Radio would give them :
1 - Better Overall Local Market Signal Coverage
2 - Better Sound Quality and the 'option' for a
Second Audio {Data} Channel.
3 - Plus Younger Listener Demographics
- - - So . . . Why Waste the Time, Money and
Technology on IBOC AM "HD" Radio which as
you admit is at best a short term lossing game.

hey 'hd' buggy whips didn't work either ~ RHF
  #84   Report Post  
Old March 10th 07, 08:46 AM posted to rec.radio.shortwave
RHF RHF is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jun 2006
Posts: 8,652
Default WLW AM ranked #1

On Mar 9, 7:41 am, "David Eduardo" wrote:
"RHF" wrote in message

s.com...
On Mar 7, 9:58 am, "David Eduardo" wrote:

wrote in message


oups.com...


"Stars line up for 'Simpsons'"


"Radio ratings: Clear Channel's WLW-AM (700) was the big winner in
spring quarter Arbitron ratings, taking first place with all adults in
morning, midday, afternoon and evening ratings."


And there is no other AM for the next 13 ranked positions in the market.


DE - When 'you' Are Numb3r # 1 (Número Uno)
Who Cares Who The Other 13 Are . . . ~ RHF

It does not work that way. The proximity of the ratings of the #1 station
and the first eight or ten others in most markets is dramatic... usually no
more than a share or so difference between #1 and #10 in most markets.This
means, to the ad buyer, that there are 10 #1 stations and rates can be
negotiated agressively.

.
.
. .


The Psychosis of Being Number One -vice-
The Psychology of Being "IN" The Top Ten
- - - "The Winner" at Any Cost -vice- 'a winner'.
Radio it's a Profitable Business and being #2-10 may
make more Business Sense {Profits} then BEING # 1.

psychedelic business thinking
seeing beyond today's reality ~ RHF
.
.
.. .

  #85   Report Post  
Old March 10th 07, 03:59 PM posted to rec.radio.shortwave
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 726
Default WLW AM ranked #1


"RHF" wrote in message
oups.com...
On Mar 9, 7:41 am, "David Eduardo" wrote:

The Psychosis of Being Number One -vice-
The Psychology of Being "IN" The Top Ten
- - - "The Winner" at Any Cost -vice- 'a winner'.
Radio it's a Profitable Business and being #2-10 may
make more Business Sense {Profits} then BEING # 1.


This is very true. I have, in fact, had owners ask NOT to be #1 as they
believe the maintenance costs of a #1 station are high, and everyone comes
gunning for you, too.




  #86   Report Post  
Old March 10th 07, 04:21 PM posted to rec.radio.shortwave
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jun 2006
Posts: 8,861
Default WLW AM ranked #1

Sayyyy Cuzz,,,, who was that cutiepie woman? I think somebody told me
somewhere she calls herself Tallulah? I saw her busy butt on the Jay
Leno,or Kevin O'Brien tv show last Monday night,I think it was.I want to
marry her for the weekends.

Delta Village,,,,,, in Tallulahhhhhh,,,,, Louisiana.I don't live far
from there,about an hour and a half drive,as slow poke as I drive.
cuhulin

  #87   Report Post  
Old March 10th 07, 04:24 PM posted to rec.radio.shortwave
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 726
Default WLW AM ranked #1


"RHF" wrote in message
ps.com...
Long Term IBOC FM "HD" Radio would give them :
1 - Better Overall Local Market Signal Coverage
2 - Better Sound Quality and the 'option' for a
Second Audio {Data} Channel.
3 - Plus Younger Listener Demographics
- - - So . . . Why Waste the Time, Money and
Technology on IBOC AM "HD" Radio which as
you admit is at best a short term lossing game.


There is a real simple reason and that is based on the fact that nearly all
broadcast companies are publicly held. Moving a big n/t station to FM and
abandoning the AM to a lesser format would require a write-down of the book
asset value of the property, which would affect earnings.

Bonneville, held by the LDS, can afford to do this kind of dramatic move.
Most of the rest will have to slowly move to simulcasts and gradual
adjustments in the values of assets, rather than just pulling the lug; HD
may offer some alternatives, such as niche music formats, too... it is a
hedge play... and for a big AM, not particularly expensive. As an example,
changing a 50 kw AM in LA to HD with a brand new transmitter is less than
$250,000 in a market where bigger stations typically bill $40 million to $60
million a year.


  #88   Report Post  
Old March 10th 07, 04:36 PM posted to rec.radio.shortwave
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jun 2006
Posts: 8,861
Default WLW AM ranked #1

www.krud.com Dudette.
cuhulin,not a Krud

Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Internet Radio Station: "Radio Free Colorado" is now Ranked as a Gary Burke Broadcasting 0 May 16th 05 07:19 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:29 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017