On Sun, 18 Mar 2007 15:31:32 GMT, "David Eduardo"
wrote:


"David" wrote in message
.. .
On 18 Mar 2007 06:26:29 -0700, "AM-HDisDead"
wrote:

On Mar 18, 12:29?am, "David Eduardo" wrote:
"AM-HDisDead" wrote in message

oups.com...

What KSL listeners had to say about HD Radio !

The fact is that Bonneville is slowly moving KSL to FM anyway.

No, they are just simulcasting - AM is going to stay.

AM radio used to work real well, until the Reagan FCC screwed it up.

The Reagan FCC did not do much of anything to AM. What did AM in was FM...
anyone under 45 has grown up in the era where more listening went to FM than
AM (currently 80% or more) and they are not used to AM, especially for
music. That is why nearly nobody under 45 uses AM... it sounds bad, is noisy
and unpleasant compared to FM, iPods, webcasts, CDs, etc.

Content matters more than delivery system.

"David" wrote in message
...
On Sun, 18 Mar 2007 15:31:32 GMT, "David Eduardo"
wrote:


"David" wrote in message
. ..
On 18 Mar 2007 06:26:29 -0700, "AM-HDisDead"
wrote:

On Mar 18, 12:29?am, "David Eduardo" wrote:
"AM-HDisDead" wrote in message

oups.com...

What KSL listeners had to say about HD Radio !

The fact is that Bonneville is slowly moving KSL to FM anyway.

No, they are just simulcasting - AM is going to stay.

AM radio used to work real well, until the Reagan FCC screwed it up.

The Reagan FCC did not do much of anything to AM. What did AM in was FM...
anyone under 45 has grown up in the era where more listening went to FM
than
AM (currently 80% or more) and they are not used to AM, especially for
music. That is why nearly nobody under 45 uses AM... it sounds bad, is
noisy
and unpleasant compared to FM, iPods, webcasts, CDs, etc.

Content matters more than delivery system.

Both matter. When news talk format are moved to FM or new "traditional" n/t
formats are put on FM, the 35-54 listening is much, much higher than an AM
with the same or comparable programming will get.

In other words, most people under a certain age will not listen to AM no
matter what is on it because the sound sucks and there is so much noise and
interference.

On Mon, 19 Mar 2007 18:01:07 GMT, "David Eduardo"
wrote:


In other words, most people under a certain age will not listen to AM no
matter what is on it because the sound sucks and there is so much noise and
interference.

So why are most of the Radio Disney stations AM?

"David" wrote in message
...
On Mon, 19 Mar 2007 18:01:07 GMT, "David Eduardo"
wrote:


In other words, most people under a certain age will not listen to AM no
matter what is on it because the sound sucks and there is so much noise
and
interference.

So why are most of the Radio Disney stations AM?

.... Because AM stations are cheap and for a couple of million, they got
about 40 of them.

Practically nobody listens; it's still a cheap marketing tool for Disney,
though.

On Tue, 20 Mar 2007 02:40:40 GMT, "David Eduardo"
wrote:


"David" wrote in message
.. .
On Mon, 19 Mar 2007 18:01:07 GMT, "David Eduardo"
wrote:


In other words, most people under a certain age will not listen to AM no
matter what is on it because the sound sucks and there is so much noise
and
interference.

So why are most of the Radio Disney stations AM?

... Because AM stations are cheap and for a couple of million, they got
about 40 of them.

Practically nobody listens; it's still a cheap marketing tool for Disney,
though.

How many ''practically nobodies'' make an audience?

"David" wrote in message
...
On Tue, 20 Mar 2007 02:40:40 GMT, "David Eduardo"
wrote:


"David" wrote in message
. ..
On Mon, 19 Mar 2007 18:01:07 GMT, "David Eduardo"
wrote:


In other words, most people under a certain age will not listen to AM no
matter what is on it because the sound sucks and there is so much noise
and
interference.

So why are most of the Radio Disney stations AM?

... Because AM stations are cheap and for a couple of million, they got
about 40 of them.

Practically nobody listens; it's still a cheap marketing tool for Disney,
though.

How many ''practically nobodies'' make an audience?

In mIn most markets, the Disney stations do not meet "Minimum Reporting
standards" because it is so low; MRS means that the listening level is so
low as to be statistically unreliable. And, in the science of statistics,
that means "undetectable" and "non-existent.2

On Mar 20, 1:23 pm, "David Eduardo" wrote:
"David" wrote in message

...





On Tue, 20 Mar 2007 02:40:40 GMT, "David Eduardo"
wrote:

"David" wrote in message
. ..
On Mon, 19 Mar 2007 18:01:07 GMT, "David Eduardo"
wrote:

In other words, most people under a certain age will not listen to AM no
matter what is on it because the sound sucks and there is so much noise
and
interference.

So why are most of the Radio Disney stations AM?

... Because AM stations are cheap and for a couple of million, they got
about 40 of them.

Practically nobody listens; it's still a cheap marketing tool for Disney,
though.

How many ''practically nobodies'' make an audience?

In mIn most markets, the Disney stations do not meet "Minimum Reporting
standards" because it is so low; MRS means that the listening level is so
low as to be statistically unreliable. And, in the science of statistics,
that means "undetectable" and "non-existent.2- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Sorry guys, I was confused. Disney stations do meet the minimum
reporting standards. It's what I get for trying to type and talk on
the phone at the same time!

In article ,
"David Eduardo" wrote:

"David" wrote in message
...
On Tue, 20 Mar 2007 02:40:40 GMT, "David Eduardo"
wrote:


"David" wrote in message
. ..
On Mon, 19 Mar 2007 18:01:07 GMT, "David Eduardo"
wrote:


In other words, most people under a certain age will not listen to AM no
matter what is on it because the sound sucks and there is so much noise
and
interference.

So why are most of the Radio Disney stations AM?

... Because AM stations are cheap and for a couple of million, they got
about 40 of them.

Practically nobody listens; it's still a cheap marketing tool for Disney,
though.

How many ''practically nobodies'' make an audience?

In mIn most markets, the Disney stations do not meet "Minimum Reporting
standards" because it is so low; MRS means that the listening level is so
low as to be statistically unreliable. And, in the science of statistics,
that means "undetectable" and "non-existent.2

Well your posts don't meet the minimum believability tests. The guy
forging your handle makes more sense than you do.

--
Telamon
Ventura, California