On Mon, 19 Mar 2007 18:01:07 GMT, "David Eduardo"
wrote:


In other words, most people under a certain age will not listen to AM no
matter what is on it because the sound sucks and there is so much noise and
interference.

So why are most of the Radio Disney stations AM?

"David" wrote in message
...
On Mon, 19 Mar 2007 18:01:07 GMT, "David Eduardo"
wrote:


In other words, most people under a certain age will not listen to AM no
matter what is on it because the sound sucks and there is so much noise
and
interference.

So why are most of the Radio Disney stations AM?

.... Because AM stations are cheap and for a couple of million, they got
about 40 of them.

Practically nobody listens; it's still a cheap marketing tool for Disney,
though.

On Tue, 20 Mar 2007 02:40:40 GMT, "David Eduardo"
wrote:


"David" wrote in message
.. .
On Mon, 19 Mar 2007 18:01:07 GMT, "David Eduardo"
wrote:


In other words, most people under a certain age will not listen to AM no
matter what is on it because the sound sucks and there is so much noise
and
interference.

So why are most of the Radio Disney stations AM?

... Because AM stations are cheap and for a couple of million, they got
about 40 of them.

Practically nobody listens; it's still a cheap marketing tool for Disney,
though.

How many ''practically nobodies'' make an audience?

"David" wrote in message
...
On Tue, 20 Mar 2007 02:40:40 GMT, "David Eduardo"
wrote:


"David" wrote in message
. ..
On Mon, 19 Mar 2007 18:01:07 GMT, "David Eduardo"
wrote:


In other words, most people under a certain age will not listen to AM no
matter what is on it because the sound sucks and there is so much noise
and
interference.

So why are most of the Radio Disney stations AM?

... Because AM stations are cheap and for a couple of million, they got
about 40 of them.

Practically nobody listens; it's still a cheap marketing tool for Disney,
though.

How many ''practically nobodies'' make an audience?

In mIn most markets, the Disney stations do not meet "Minimum Reporting
standards" because it is so low; MRS means that the listening level is so
low as to be statistically unreliable. And, in the science of statistics,
that means "undetectable" and "non-existent.2

On Mar 20, 1:23 pm, "David Eduardo" wrote:
"David" wrote in message

...





On Tue, 20 Mar 2007 02:40:40 GMT, "David Eduardo"
wrote:

"David" wrote in message
. ..
On Mon, 19 Mar 2007 18:01:07 GMT, "David Eduardo"
wrote:

In other words, most people under a certain age will not listen to AM no
matter what is on it because the sound sucks and there is so much noise
and
interference.

So why are most of the Radio Disney stations AM?

... Because AM stations are cheap and for a couple of million, they got
about 40 of them.

Practically nobody listens; it's still a cheap marketing tool for Disney,
though.

How many ''practically nobodies'' make an audience?

In mIn most markets, the Disney stations do not meet "Minimum Reporting
standards" because it is so low; MRS means that the listening level is so
low as to be statistically unreliable. And, in the science of statistics,
that means "undetectable" and "non-existent.2- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Sorry guys, I was confused. Disney stations do meet the minimum
reporting standards. It's what I get for trying to type and talk on
the phone at the same time!

In article ,
"David Eduardo" wrote:

"David" wrote in message
...
On Tue, 20 Mar 2007 02:40:40 GMT, "David Eduardo"
wrote:


"David" wrote in message
. ..
On Mon, 19 Mar 2007 18:01:07 GMT, "David Eduardo"
wrote:


In other words, most people under a certain age will not listen to AM no
matter what is on it because the sound sucks and there is so much noise
and
interference.

So why are most of the Radio Disney stations AM?

... Because AM stations are cheap and for a couple of million, they got
about 40 of them.

Practically nobody listens; it's still a cheap marketing tool for Disney,
though.

How many ''practically nobodies'' make an audience?

In mIn most markets, the Disney stations do not meet "Minimum Reporting
standards" because it is so low; MRS means that the listening level is so
low as to be statistically unreliable. And, in the science of statistics,
that means "undetectable" and "non-existent.2

Well your posts don't meet the minimum believability tests. The guy
forging your handle makes more sense than you do.

--
Telamon
Ventura, California

On Mar 20, 10:23 pm, Telamon
wrote:
In article ,
"David Eduardo" wrote:



"David" wrote in message
.. .
On Tue, 20 Mar 2007 02:40:40 GMT, "David Eduardo"
wrote:

"David" wrote in message
. ..
On Mon, 19 Mar 2007 18:01:07 GMT, "David Eduardo"
wrote:

In other words, most people under a certain age will not listen to AM no
matter what is on it because the sound sucks and there is so much noise
and
interference.

So why are most of the Radio Disney stations AM?

... Because AM stations are cheap and for a couple of million, they got
about 40 of them.

Practically nobody listens; it's still a cheap marketing tool for Disney,
though.

How many ''practically nobodies'' make an audience?

In mIn most markets, the Disney stations do not meet "Minimum Reporting
standards" because it is so low; MRS means that the listening level is so
low as to be statistically unreliable. And, in the science of statistics,
that means "undetectable" and "non-existent.2

Well your posts don't meet the minimum believability tests. The guy
forging your handle makes more sense than you do.

--
Telamon
Ventura, California


Perhaps, but I'll bet my collection of teenage boys' used underwear
far exceeds anything he can imagine.