In article vmILh.1689$zN.16@trndny03, HFguy
wrote:

David Eduardo wrote:

"HD Radio Fan" wrote in message
...

"David Eduardo" wrote

The same company started simulcasting KTAR (AM) on FM in Phoenix,
and 6 months later, the news / talk format was only on FM.

(That is what "slowly moving" means... a lengthy transition to get
people used to the idea of finding the station on FM, not AM).


Don't expect a Calipornia public school dropout to understand
anything even remotely similiar to logic.


Very funny.

1. I never went to school in Califonia. 2. I did not go to public
school. 3. I dropped out of the Colegio Americano in Quito to put
my own radio staiton on the air. 4. I was deans list for many
semesters in college 10 years later when i did my university
studies part time while working. 5. Logic involves analyzing facts
and drawing conclusions. Ams moving to FM and becoming more
successful indicates that more will do the same thing... that is
logic.

At this point David, the question is why are you spending so much
time on this group and others, defending HD radio and your personal
life as well. You said a while ago that it doesn't take much time
from your schedule to make all these responses but it's beginning to
look like you must be compensated in some way to make it worth your
time. There are just too many posts on this subject from someone that
supposedly has more important responsibilities in the radio industry
than arguing on a Usenet group. No one on this group is going to have
any say in the outcome of HD radio, with the possible exception of
someone participating in a listener survey.

He is not arguing. In order to argue a point one has to provide
information supporting one's position. This information must support
one's position in a logical way or it does not sway anyone else's
thinking. He can not prove that his arguments are valid. He falls back
to a position of having "special knowledge" that no one else can
verify.

So why do you care?

Good question.

--
Telamon
Ventura, California

"Telamon" wrote in message
...

He is not arguing. In order to argue a point one has to provide
information supporting one's position. This information must support
one's position in a logical way or it does not sway anyone else's
thinking. He can not prove that his arguments are valid. He falls back
to a position of having "special knowledge" that no one else can
verify.

Nearly everyone in commercial radio has access, for example, to Arbitron
data. However, it is copyright and costs... as an example... as much as $2
million a year to an LA station cluster to subscribe... and can not be given
out freely. So that is the sort of data that I have and you don't. I also
have access to all kinds of proprietary radio research that you can never
get, either. Some guys at Coke have access to the formula for the soft
drink, but you don't...

The world is filled with special knowledge. In the case of radio, you have
none of it. Your choice is to believe those who do have access, or to pound
sand. Apparently you like the beach better than the truth.

In article ,
"David Eduardo" wrote:

"Telamon" wrote in message
...

He is not arguing. In order to argue a point one has to provide
information supporting one's position. This information must support
one's position in a logical way or it does not sway anyone else's
thinking. He can not prove that his arguments are valid. He falls back
to a position of having "special knowledge" that no one else can
verify.

Nearly everyone in commercial radio has access, for example, to Arbitron
data. However, it is copyright and costs... as an example... as much as $2
million a year to an LA station cluster to subscribe... and can not be given
out freely. So that is the sort of data that I have and you don't. I also
have access to all kinds of proprietary radio research that you can never
get, either. Some guys at Coke have access to the formula for the soft
drink, but you don't...

The world is filled with special knowledge. In the case of radio, you have
none of it. Your choice is to believe those who do have access, or to pound
sand. Apparently you like the beach better than the truth.

I like the beach better than the BS you dish out. This not the only
instance of "special knowledge" you have demonstrated and is a fallback
position anytime someone tries to pin you down on a specific that you
continually pontificate on the news group. I generally give people the
benefit of the doubt but you have far gone far beyond reasonable doubt
my fabricating friend.

--
Telamon
Ventura, California