In article , JeroenK
wrote:

Rejected schreef:
Why don't you block those people who post subjects your not interested in
that way you'll only see those posts that you want to read?

Because occasionally they make worthwhile posts as well. And spending X
amount of time adding/editing filters is not that much different from
wading through the offtopic junk IMO.

Filer on the references header. Lets say I respond to the hated David
infomercial then my post will be killed. If I respond to a different
poster you have not filter on then my post will show up.

--
Telamon
Ventura, California

No they don't.

--
Brian Denley
http://home.comcast.net/~b.denley/index.html

Because occasionally they make worthwhile posts as well.

Paul Zak wrote:

As a responder to your post mentioned, a moderated NG may be the answer. I
have offered in the past & repeat now, I would be willing to act as a
moderator in a new *moderated* NG for SWL.

You seem to be asking for permission to do this, which certainly isn't
necessary. What would it take to get you started with a moderated SWL group?

Brian Denley wrote:

Because occasionally they make worthwhile posts as well.

No they don't.

I came to the conclusion that all the worthwhile posts in the world
aren't worth anything from someone that also participates in abusive OT
behavior. They don't deserve to have any of their posts read or replied to.

Good old Telamon,,, he/she/it has good sense.Telamon never responds to
me.I know I am in Telamon's Kill File,but that's alright.Telamon,tell
all them purrrrty wimmins over there in California auld Hansom Larry
here in Jackson,Mississippi,Loves them.

.......Larry,cuhulin
.................................................. ...
I know Telamon won't tell em nutin.
.................................................. ...

They don't what?
cuhulin

I always first ask me wimmins,''permission'' first.If they say, NO! I
always respect their wishes.It ''works'' for me.
cuhulin,the respectfull

What the h..l is abusive off topic behavior?
cuhulin

Definitely not asking permission, I never do that (I subscribe to the
thought that it's always better to beg forgiveness that ask permission;
besides, I don't need permission). I guess I'm sending out feelers to gauge
interest in a new, moderated NG. Also I need to research how to start up a
NG! : }

"HFguy" wrote in message
news:uXvMh.10833$DX5.785@trndny06...
Paul Zak wrote:

As a responder to your post mentioned, a moderated NG may be the answer.
I
have offered in the past & repeat now, I would be willing to act as a
moderator in a new *moderated* NG for SWL.

You seem to be asking for permission to do this, which certainly isn't
necessary. What would it take to get you started with a moderated SWL
group?

ow mony (timessssss have ye heard someone sayyyyy,,,,,, if I ad his
moneyyyyy,,,,,, I would do things my wayyyyy,,,,,,, noo one chonce in a
millionnnnnnn,,,,,, does a poor mon aveeeeee,,,,,,,, I rather be
appyyyyyyy,,,,,, wee a good hearted galllll,,,,,,,,,,)
cuhulin
................................................
LQQK it up on the enterhernet
................................................