Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hey All,
I know I'm not contributing that much to this group, nevertheless I'd like to say I'm very close to giving up on this group and moving on to other places that cost me less time to wade through to find the few worthwhile posts. Its no fun spending this amount of time to wade through and be left with less then 5% or so posts actually worth reading. I'm surprised not many others speak up. Maybe they already left long ago. Also because of the political and propaganda posts that fill up this group. Anyway, just wanted to say before I just silently go away. Maybe it helps, maybe not ![]() Have a good day all, -- JeroenK |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() JeroenK wrote: Hey All, I know I'm not contributing that much to this group, nevertheless I'd like to say I'm very close to giving up on this group and moving on to other places that cost me less time to wade through to find the few worthwhile posts. Its no fun spending this amount of time to wade through and be left with less then 5% or so posts actually worth reading. I'm surprised not many others speak up. Maybe they already left long ago. Also because of the political and propaganda posts that fill up this group. Anyway, just wanted to say before I just silently go away. Maybe it helps, maybe not ![]() Have a good day all, -- JeroenK I hope you'll stick it out a little longer. Every group goes through phases, and while I agree that we're in the middle of a fairly bad phase right now, things might get better. Your frustration is perfectly understandable though. Like you, I don't care for all the political posts that appear here, and we've been inundated by spam posts about IBOC for the past several weeks. Nevertheless I find that the occasional on-topic post still makes this group worthwhile. Steve |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Why don't you block those people who post subjects your not interested in
that way you'll only see those posts that you want to read? "Steve" wrote in message oups.com... JeroenK wrote: Hey All, I know I'm not contributing that much to this group, nevertheless I'd like to say I'm very close to giving up on this group and moving on to other places that cost me less time to wade through to find the few worthwhile posts. Its no fun spending this amount of time to wade through and be left with less then 5% or so posts actually worth reading. I'm surprised not many others speak up. Maybe they already left long ago. Also because of the political and propaganda posts that fill up this group. Anyway, just wanted to say before I just silently go away. Maybe it helps, maybe not ![]() Have a good day all, -- JeroenK I hope you'll stick it out a little longer. Every group goes through phases, and while I agree that we're in the middle of a fairly bad phase right now, things might get better. Your frustration is perfectly understandable though. Like you, I don't care for all the political posts that appear here, and we've been inundated by spam posts about IBOC for the past several weeks. Nevertheless I find that the occasional on-topic post still makes this group worthwhile. Steve |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Rejected schreef:
Why don't you block those people who post subjects your not interested in that way you'll only see those posts that you want to read? Because occasionally they make worthwhile posts as well. And spending X amount of time adding/editing filters is not that much different from wading through the offtopic junk IMO. -- JeroenK |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article , JeroenK
wrote: Rejected schreef: Why don't you block those people who post subjects your not interested in that way you'll only see those posts that you want to read? Because occasionally they make worthwhile posts as well. And spending X amount of time adding/editing filters is not that much different from wading through the offtopic junk IMO. Filer on the references header. Lets say I respond to the hated David infomercial then my post will be killed. If I respond to a different poster you have not filter on then my post will show up. -- Telamon Ventura, California |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Good old Telamon,,, he/she/it has good sense.Telamon never responds to
me.I know I am in Telamon's Kill File,but that's alright.Telamon,tell all them purrrrty wimmins over there in California auld Hansom Larry here in Jackson,Mississippi,Loves them. .......Larry,cuhulin .................................................. ... I know Telamon won't tell em nutin. .................................................. ... |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Telamon" wrote in message .. .. In article , JeroenK wrote: Rejected schreef: Why don't you block those people who post subjects your not interested in that way you'll only see those posts that you want to read? Because occasionally they make worthwhile posts as well. And spending X amount of time adding/editing filters is not that much different from wading through the offtopic junk IMO. Filer on the references header. Lets say I respond to the hated David infomercial then my post will be killed. If I respond to a different poster you have not filter on then my post will show up. -- Telamon Ventura, California I usually just block them anyway. If they are using foul language or spamming, I usually figure I don't need any info from them that I cant get somewhere else or from someone else. B |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
No they don't.
-- Brian Denley http://home.comcast.net/~b.denley/index.html Because occasionally they make worthwhile posts as well. |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Brian Denley wrote:
Because occasionally they make worthwhile posts as well. No they don't. I came to the conclusion that all the worthwhile posts in the world aren't worth anything from someone that also participates in abusive OT behavior. They don't deserve to have any of their posts read or replied to. |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
They don't what?
cuhulin |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Giving out free QRP transmitters | Swap | |||
Thanks-Giving 2005 | Policy | |||
Thanks-Giving 2005 | CB | |||
Wonder why the FCC is giving away the airways? Here is why. | General | |||
US giving SW radios to Afghanistan | Shortwave |