LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #4   Report Post  
Old April 1st 07, 11:10 AM posted to rec.radio.shortwave
RHF RHF is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jun 2006
Posts: 8,652
Default BA Receptor "HD" Radio -vice- Sangean HDT-1 "HD" Radio Component Tuner ? ? ?

On Apr 1, 2:23 am, Doug Smith W9WI wrote:
On Sat, 31 Mar 2007 16:14:38 -0700, RHF wrote:
Which is the Better "HD" FM Radio ?
-and- Is and External FM Antenna 'critical'
for "HD" FM Radio Reception ?


More importantly which is the Better "HD" AM/MW Radio ?
-and- Is and External AM/MW Antenna 'critical'
for "HD" AM/MW Radio Reception ?


I have only the Boston Acoustics.

FM: at my location, 25 miles from the nearest HD station, an external
antenna is critical for HD reception. Right now, I have a set of TV
rabbit ears connected, and can reliably receive three HD stations. Five
more local stations are known to be HD but don't come in on the "bunny
ears" - I need the rooftop TV antenna for those. I'm near Nashville -
which is Class C territory, so if you're in the Northeast where stations
are limited to 50,000 watts a better antenna will be even more important.

AM: An external antenna is even more critical for AM. We have two local
HD AM stations, WPLN-1430 (15,000 watts) and WLAC-1510 (50,000 watts).
Neither can be received for more than a few seconds with the antenna
provided with the radio. Both can be received reliably with my 160-meter
ham antenna. I don't have anything between the two - I suspect you don't
need anything nearly as big as the ham antenna but have no way of knowing.


Wonder if any one is using a simply 14"-24" AM/MW "Box"
Loop Antenna with with one of these "HD" Radios and -if-
They are good enough to acquire a reliable "HD" Signal ?
-But- That requires Tuning the Radio and the Antenna every
time you change an AM/MW Radio Station.

The BA is to a considerable degree subject to self-interference. (the
radio emits spurious signals that interfere with its own reception...) It
may not be as much that the external antennas are necessary to increase
the signal strength of the HD signals, as that the external antennas are
necessary to reduce the amount of the radio's own spurious RF interfering
with the stations...


Sounds like the same problem that I have with the Analog
version of the BA Receptor up here In-them-there-Hills.
Needs both an AM and FM Antenna to be able to receive
any signals reliabily -except- for KXSR which is up the
Hill about a Mile on 91.7 with 4 KW ERP.
KXSR = http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/fmq?list=0&facid=8328

DS [W9WI] - Thank Your for Your Reply ~ RHF
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Honest Thoughts about David -the- "Eduardo" - Champion of "HD" Radio [email protected] Shortwave 0 March 26th 07 03:03 PM
Honest Thoughts about David -the- "Eduardo" - Champion of "HD" Radio David Eduardo[_3_] Shortwave 0 March 26th 07 03:16 AM
Honest Thoughts about David -the- "Eduardo" - Champion of "HD" Radio David Eduardo[_3_] Shortwave 0 March 26th 07 03:14 AM
"meltdown in progress"..."is amy fireproof"...The Actions Of A "Man" With Three College Degrees? K4YZ Policy 6 August 28th 06 11:11 PM
GE AM/MW Radio "Long Range" and "High Sensitivity" {The GE Supe... RHF Shortwave 1 June 16th 06 11:56 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:17 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017