Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old May 1st 07, 05:05 AM posted to rec.radio.shortwave
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: May 2007
Posts: 1
Default Atomic Clock Malfunctioning and Battery

Hello, All:

As my first post two years ago indicated that I bought an atomic clock
in February, 2005, and it worked fine until July, 2005 when the clock
started to display arbitrary Month, Date, Day, etc..

Michael Black suggested (in July, 2005) that I change the battery.
Well, I did not. I wanted to see how far it could go. After three or
four or five days, it resumed normal.

And then in August, 2006 (as far as I can recall), the same thing
happened again. I did not change the battery and the malfunctioning
was gone after three or four days.

And it has since been normal. It is 2 years and 2 months since I
bought it and I have never changed the battery.

--Roland



"qquito" wrote in message

Hello, Everyone:


I bought an "atomic clock" in February, 2005, and it has since been
working fine. I live on the eastern coast and now use EDT.



But then at about 2:00 PM, July 20, 2005, I noticed the clock display
"SAT" while it was actually "WED". The Month, Date, Hour, Minute, and
Second were all correct, though. Also, the logo of a radio wave tower
was on, meaning the clock had received the NIST signal for the day.
When I got home after midnight (It was now July 21), the clock
displayed "THU" correctly.



Could it have been that NIST sent a wrong signal for the weekday on
July 20, 2005?


Michael Black
Date: 24 Jul 2005 02:16:36 GMT
Local: Sun, Jul 24 2005 10:16 pm
Subject: An NIST Mistake on "Atomic Clock"
......


Have you changed the battery? I can see the clock acting up because
the battery is low, and then not getting proper reception to resync
properly.

  #2   Report Post  
Old May 1st 07, 07:19 AM posted to rec.radio.shortwave
RHF RHF is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jun 2006
Posts: 8,652
Default Atomic Clock Malfunctioning and Battery

On Apr 30, 9:05 pm, qquito wrote:
Hello, All:

As my first post two years ago indicated that I bought an atomic clock
in February, 2005, and it worked fine until July, 2005 when the clock
started to display arbitrary Month, Date, Day, etc..

Michael Black suggested (in July, 2005) that I change the battery.
Well, I did not. I wanted to see how far it could go. After three or
four or five days, it resumed normal.

And then in August, 2006 (as far as I can recall), the same thing
happened again. I did not change the battery and the malfunctioning
was gone after three or four days.

And it has since been normal. It is 2 years and 2 months since I
bought it and I have never changed the battery.

--Roland

"qquito" wrote in message

Hello, Everyone:
I bought an "atomic clock" in February, 2005, and it has since been
working fine. I live on the eastern coast and now use EDT.
But then at about 2:00 PM, July 20, 2005, I noticed the clock display
"SAT" while it was actually "WED". The Month, Date, Hour, Minute, and
Second were all correct, though. Also, the logo of a radio wave tower
was on, meaning the clock had received the NIST signal for the day.
When I got home after midnight (It was now July 21), the clock
displayed "THU" correctly.
Could it have been that NIST sent a wrong signal for the weekday on
July 20, 2005?


Michael Black
Date: 24 Jul 2005 02:16:36 GMT
Local: Sun, Jul 24 2005 10:16 pm
Subject: An NIST Mistake on "Atomic Clock"

......


Have you changed the battery? I can see the clock acting up because
the battery is low, and then not getting proper reception to resync
properly.


QQUITO - More likely that there is something in your area
that is interferring with the Time Signal and you will simply
have to live with it -or- more. ~ RHF
  #3   Report Post  
Old May 2nd 07, 03:05 AM posted to rec.radio.shortwave
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 4,494
Default Atomic Clock Malfunctioning and Battery

In article .com,
qquito wrote:

Hello, All:

As my first post two years ago indicated that I bought an atomic clock
in February, 2005, and it worked fine until July, 2005 when the clock
started to display arbitrary Month, Date, Day, etc..

Michael Black suggested (in July, 2005) that I change the battery.
Well, I did not. I wanted to see how far it could go. After three or
four or five days, it resumed normal.

And then in August, 2006 (as far as I can recall), the same thing
happened again. I did not change the battery and the malfunctioning
was gone after three or four days.

And it has since been normal. It is 2 years and 2 months since I
bought it and I have never changed the battery.


Snip

My radio looks for a signal every evening and if it finds one an
indicator is set in the display. Very few nights a year it is not set
here in southern California.

--
Telamon
Ventura, California
Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
"Atomic clock" for cheap! [email protected] Shortwave 6 February 10th 22 09:23 PM
atomic clock audio stream? Chris J. Popp Shortwave 24 July 2nd 14 01:52 AM
An NIST Mistake on "Atomic Clock" qquito Shortwave 9 July 25th 05 03:16 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:12 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017