|
(OT) : The Canadian National Psychosis - American Envy !
ve3... wrote:
There will be no unanswered insults. If you stop telling lies about Canada, I will stop telling the truth about the US. Funny. That's exactly what's happening from down here. Someone got tired of the gratuitous insults from Canada, and took a 'no insult unanswered' stance. So, again, you're bitching because someone hit you back first. Canadian insults stop, US insults will stop. Your call. I suppose you come by it honestly. When your PM levies personal insults at our President, it kind of becomes national policy. Get your facts right. Stephen Harper, the Prime Minister, has his head so far up Bush's ass he needs assistants to hold his shoelaces. Harper, a well-known neocon, can't call an election because his ratings are too low. Please cite the occasion where Harper insulted Bush. And here we have it. History starts at a random point of convenience. Go back one PM. The aide to Chretien that called Bush a moron in an official memo. He resigned. Interestingly, however, he was not fired by Chretien, nor was the remark retracted by the PM. So, you get YOUR facts, straight, buckwheat. History doesn't start with your entry into the fray. And you don't get to start a 'no insult unanswered' retaliation when it was your countrymen who started the insult fest first. "Mii," and "MichaelMoore" have been taking gratuitous shots at the US since long before you showed your handle here. Had you done your own homework, gotten your own facts straight, you would have known that. But then, you're Canadian, and beyond the reach of criticism, aren't you? No insult unanswered, indeed. I suppose you don't know that the Anti-US insults came across the border for weeks unanswered before some members here started let no insult go unanswered. But then, why would you. Everyone knows there are no enemies on the Left...or to the North. That you are, by geography, if not politics, beyond the reach of criticism. And that you must let no insult go unanswered. If for no other reason than to assert your righteousness. No insult unaswered, indeed. Arrogance in DNA. You let your countrymen lob shots across the border, and then you object to the response with indignation. "MOM, he hit me back first." |
(OT) : The Canadian National Psychosis - American Envy !
There is NO Way Canada/Canadians can insult me! They are NOT worth it!
cuhulin |
(OT) : The Canadian National Psychosis - American Envy !
|
(OT) : The Canadian National Psychosis - American Envy !
On May 14, 6:24 pm, D Peter Maus wrote:
ve3... wrote: There will be no unanswered insults. If you stop telling lies about Canada, I will stop telling the truth about the US. Funny. That's exactly what's happening from down here. Someone got tired of the gratuitous insults from Canada, and took a 'no insult unanswered' stance. So, again, you're bitching because someone hit you back first. Canadian insults stop, US insults will stop. Your call. I suppose you come by it honestly. When your PM levies personal insults at our President, it kind of becomes national policy. Get your facts right. Stephen Harper, the Prime Minister, has his head so far up Bush's ass he needs assistants to hold his shoelaces. Harper, a well-known neocon, can't call an election because his ratings are too low. Please cite the occasion where Harper insulted Bush. And here we have it. History starts at a random point of convenience. Go back one PM. The aide to Chretien that called Bush a moron in an official memo. He resigned. Interestingly, however, he was not fired by Chretien, nor was the remark retracted by the PM. So, you get YOUR facts, straight, buckwheat. History doesn't start with your entry into the fray. And you don't get to start a 'no insult unanswered' retaliation when it was your countrymen who started the insult fest first. "Mii," and "MichaelMoore" have been taking gratuitous shots at the US since long before you showed your handle here. Had you done your own homework, gotten your own facts straight, you would have known that. But then, you're Canadian, and beyond the reach of criticism, aren't you? No insult unanswered, indeed. I suppose you don't know that the Anti-US insults came across the border for weeks unanswered before some members here started let no insult go unanswered. But then, why would you. Everyone knows there are no enemies on the Left...or to the North. That you are, by geography, if not politics, beyond the reach of criticism. And that you must let no insult go unanswered. If for no other reason than to assert your righteousness. No insult unaswered, indeed. Arrogance in DNA. You let your countrymen lob shots across the border, and then you object to the response with indignation. "MOM, he hit me back first." """""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""" """"""""" First of all, I consider your calling me "buckwheat" a gratuitous insult so you had better get ready for some "incoming." (1) You make a big fuss about "getting your facts right." Why don't you follow your own advice? "Go back one PM." That would be John Turner. If you are talking about Chretien, that's back TWO PM's. When you say "your PM" I think it quite reasonable to think you are referring to the present PM. And the aide was a "she" not a "he." Great example of "getting your facts straight." (2) You say history starts at a random point of convenience. Convenient to who? You? How far back do you want to go? Chretien didn't like Bush. Diefenbaker didn't like Kennedy. King didn't like Roosevelt......... Cartier thought the Jamestown settlers were trailer trash. So what? You have to set the terms of reference at the beginning of the discussion, not when you want to shift your argument. That's why I ignored your previous rant about terrorists and Al-quieda about which you objected. It had nothing to do with the topic we were discussing. Please stay on topic and stop dragging red herrings across the thread. (3) I admit that I didn't know about the early feud, but I speak for myself so it is not relevant. I don't think Cato got a fair shake just because he was Canadian and he knew nothing about the earlier feud but some of the inhabitants of this site are close to psychotic and were drooling at the prospect of a new victim. To sum up: I will not initiate an insult but if you think I will ignore one you have another think coming. |
(OT) : The Canadian National Psychosis - American Envy !
On May 14, 7:05 pm, wrote:
There is NO Way Canada/Canadians can insult me! They are NOT worth it! cuhulin """""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""" """"""""""" Believe me that this Canadian could insult you so bad that you would end up curled up in a corner in a fetal position sucking your thumb. But I think you are a peacemaker so I would never do it. Best Regards. |
(OT) : The Canadian National Psychosis - American Envy !
"ve3..." wrote: On May 14, 7:05 pm, wrote: There is NO Way Canada/Canadians can insult me! They are NOT worth it! cuhulin """""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""" """"""""""" Believe me that this Canadian could insult you so bad that you would end up curled up in a corner in a fetal position sucking your thumb. More Canucky BS. |
(OT) : The Canadian National Psychosis - American Envy !
"ve3..." wrote: On May 14, 6:24 pm, D Peter Maus wrote: ve3... wrote: There will be no unanswered insults. If you stop telling lies about Canada, I will stop telling the truth about the US. Funny. That's exactly what's happening from down here. Someone got tired of the gratuitous insults from Canada, and took a 'no insult unanswered' stance. So, again, you're bitching because someone hit you back first. Canadian insults stop, US insults will stop. Your call. I suppose you come by it honestly. When your PM levies personal insults at our President, it kind of becomes national policy. Get your facts right. Stephen Harper, the Prime Minister, has his head so far up Bush's ass he needs assistants to hold his shoelaces. Harper, a well-known neocon, can't call an election because his ratings are too low. Please cite the occasion where Harper insulted Bush. And here we have it. History starts at a random point of convenience. Go back one PM. The aide to Chretien that called Bush a moron in an official memo. He resigned. Interestingly, however, he was not fired by Chretien, nor was the remark retracted by the PM. So, you get YOUR facts, straight, buckwheat. History doesn't start with your entry into the fray. And you don't get to start a 'no insult unanswered' retaliation when it was your countrymen who started the insult fest first. "Mii," and "MichaelMoore" have been taking gratuitous shots at the US since long before you showed your handle here. Had you done your own homework, gotten your own facts straight, you would have known that. But then, you're Canadian, and beyond the reach of criticism, aren't you? No insult unanswered, indeed. I suppose you don't know that the Anti-US insults came across the border for weeks unanswered before some members here started let no insult go unanswered. But then, why would you. Everyone knows there are no enemies on the Left...or to the North. That you are, by geography, if not politics, beyond the reach of criticism. And that you must let no insult go unanswered. If for no other reason than to assert your righteousness. No insult unaswered, indeed. Arrogance in DNA. You let your countrymen lob shots across the border, and then you object to the response with indignation. "MOM, he hit me back first." """""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""" """"""""" First of all, I consider your calling me "buckwheat" a gratuitous insult so you had better get ready for some "incoming." Who gives a rats ass what *you* consider. (1) You make a big fuss about "getting your facts right." Why don't you follow your own advice? "Go back one PM." That would be John Turner. If you are talking about Chretien, that's back TWO PM's. When you say "your PM" I think it quite reasonable to think you are referring to the present PM. And the aide was a "she" not a "he." Great example of "getting your facts straight." PM? Does that stand for PussyMan? In CanaDuhs case I guess it does. (2) You say history starts at a random point of convenience. Convenient to who? You? Better him than a dumbass Canuck. How far back do you want to go? Chretien didn't like Bush. Diefenbaker didn't like Kennedy. King didn't like Roosevelt......... Seems like a pattern! Dumbass Canucks behaving like dumbass Canucks. Go figure, I don't like dumbass Canucks. Cartier thought the Jamestown settlers were trailer trash. Wrong! Canucks are trailer trash. So what? You have to set the terms of reference at the beginning of the discussion, not when you want to shift your argument. My term of reference is that there seems to be an abundance of dumbass Canucks. That's why I ignored your previous rant about terrorists and Al-quieda about which you objected. Keep ignoring those folks and there will be a prayer rug in your sorry ass future. Aw, what was I thinking! You present is pretty sorry ass! It had nothing to do with the topic we were discussing. Please stay on topic and stop dragging red herrings across the thread. (3) I admit that I didn't know about the early feud, but I speak for myself so it is not relevant. I don't think Cato got a fair shake just because he was Canadian and he knew nothing about the earlier feud but some of the inhabitants of this site are close to psychotic and were drooling at the prospect of a new victim. Drooling? Isn't that what you psychotic Canucks spend a lot of time doing? Drooling over the USofA. To sum up: I will not initiate an insult but if you think I will ignore one you have another think coming. Run along now! |
(OT) : The Canadian National Psychosis - American Envy !
O.K., look! This is something that we should give some grown-up thought to...... Al Quada has a list of countries to be targetted. There are ten countries on the list. Among the targets is the U.S.A., and Canada. These characters are suicidal maniacs, but also they have a bit of idiotic cleverness. Don't you think it is possible that they would use every means available to sow dissension among us, their enemies? Don't you think they want us to argue and fight among ourselves? What better way to weaken your enemy then to get your various enemies to fight and hate each other? Maybe we have a couple guys on this list working for Al Quada or other Muslim extremists, trying to drive a wedge between Americans and Canadians? They do have access to the internet, just as we do. Just a thought. Cato |
(OT) : The Canadian National Psychosis - American Envy !
D Peter Maus wrote:
The aide to Chretien that called Bush a moron in an official memo. He resigned. Interestingly, however, he was not fired by Chretien, nor was the remark retracted by the PM. *ACTUAL* quotes from the W hisself: "I think anybody who doesn't think I'm smart enough to handle the job is underestimating." --U.S. News & World Report, April 3, 2000 "Rarely is the question asked: is our children learning" --Florence, SC, Jan. 11, 2000 "Actually, I -- this may sound a little West Texan to you, but I like it. When I'm talking about -- when I'm talking about myself, and when he's talking about myself, all of us are talking about me." --Hardball, MSNBC, May 31, 2000 "It's clearly a budget. It's got a lot of numbers in it." --Reuters, May 5, 2000 "I was raised in the West. The west of Texas. It's pretty close to California. In more ways than Washington, D.C., is close to California." --Los Angeles Times, April 8, 2000 "We want our teachers to be trained so they can meet the obligations; their obligations as teachers. We want them to know how to teach the science of reading. In order to make sure there's not this kind of federal cufflink." --Fritsche Middle School, Milwaukee, March 30, 2000 and many more at: http://www.dubyasays.com/ ....and there are *multiple* BOOKS of "Bushisms" at your local Public Library awaiting your perusal. So Bush *IS* a clearly documented moron and the aide was just telling the truth. It's a damn shame when someone loses their job for telling the truth. :-( |
(OT) : The Canadian National Psychosis - American Envy !
ve3... wrote:
(3) I admit that I didn't know about the early feud, but I speak for myself so it is not relevant. So, history begins and ends with you. I had no idea you were so significant. You may consider me properly awed. It's not often that I find someone so determined to perpetuate a bitchfest that they admit to not caring about the facts. Nice going. "Mommy...he hit me back first." |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:27 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com