(OT) : The Canadian National Psychosis - American Envy !
 

On May 14, 9:22 pm, dxAce wrote:
"ve3..." wrote:
On May 14, 6:24 pm, D Peter Maus wrote:
ve3... wrote:
There will be no unanswered insults. If you stop telling lies
about Canada, I will stop telling the truth about the US.

Funny. That's exactly what's happening from down here. Someone
got tired of the gratuitous insults from Canada, and took a 'no insult
unanswered' stance.

So, again, you're bitching because someone hit you back first.

Canadian insults stop, US insults will stop.

Your call.

I suppose you come by it honestly. When your PM levies personal
insults at our President, it kind of becomes national policy.

Get your facts right. Stephen Harper, the Prime Minister, has his
head so far up Bush's ass he needs assistants to hold his shoelaces.
Harper, a well-known neocon, can't call an election because his
ratings are too low. Please cite the occasion where Harper insulted
Bush.

And here we have it. History starts at a random point of
convenience. Go back one PM. The aide to Chretien that called Bush a
moron in an official memo. He resigned. Interestingly, however, he was
not fired by Chretien, nor was the remark retracted by the PM.

So, you get YOUR facts, straight, buckwheat. History doesn't
start with your entry into the fray. And you don't get to start a 'no
insult unanswered' retaliation when it was your countrymen who started
the insult fest first.

"Mii," and "MichaelMoore" have been taking gratuitous shots at
the US since long before you showed your handle here. Had you done your
own homework, gotten your own facts straight, you would have known that.
But then, you're Canadian, and beyond the reach of criticism, aren't you?

No insult unanswered, indeed.

I suppose you don't know that the Anti-US insults came across
the border for weeks unanswered before some members here started let no
insult go unanswered. But then, why would you. Everyone knows there are
no enemies on the Left...or to the North. That you are, by geography, if
not politics, beyond the reach of criticism. And that you must let no
insult go unanswered. If for no other reason than to assert your
righteousness.

No insult unaswered, indeed.

Arrogance in DNA. You let your countrymen lob shots across the
border, and then you object to the response with indignation.

"MOM, he hit me back first."

"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""" """""""""
First of all, I consider your calling me "buckwheat" a gratuitous
insult so you had better get ready for some "incoming."

Who gives a rats ass what *you* consider.

(1) You make a big fuss about "getting your facts right." Why don't
you follow your own advice? "Go back one PM." That would be John
Turner. If you are talking about Chretien, that's back TWO PM's. When
you say "your PM" I think it quite reasonable to think you are
referring to the present PM. And the aide was a "she" not a "he."
Great example of "getting your facts straight."

PM? Does that stand for PussyMan? In CanaDuhs case I guess it does.

(2) You say history starts at a random point of convenience.
Convenient to who? You?

Better him than a dumbass Canuck.

How far back do you want to go? Chretien
didn't like Bush. Diefenbaker didn't like Kennedy. King didn't like
Roosevelt.........

Seems like a pattern! Dumbass Canucks behaving like dumbass Canucks.

Go figure, I don't like dumbass Canucks.



Cartier thought the Jamestown settlers were trailer trash.

Wrong! Canucks are trailer trash.

So what?

You have to set the terms of reference at the beginning of the
discussion, not when you want to shift your argument.

My term of reference is that there seems to be an abundance of dumbass Canucks.

That's why I
ignored your previous rant about terrorists and Al-quieda about which
you objected.

Keep ignoring those folks and there will be a prayer rug in your sorry ass
future.

Aw, what was I thinking! You present is pretty sorry ass!

It had nothing to do with the topic we were discussing.
Please stay on topic and stop dragging red herrings across the thread.

(3) I admit that I didn't know about the early feud, but I speak for
myself so it is not relevant. I don't think Cato got a fair shake just
because he was Canadian and he knew nothing about the earlier feud but
some of the inhabitants of this site are close to psychotic and were
drooling at the prospect of a new victim.

Drooling? Isn't that what you psychotic Canucks spend a lot of time doing?
Drooling over the USofA.

To sum up: I will not initiate an insult but if you think I will
ignore one you have another think coming.

Run along now!- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""" """"""""
VE3 insult return fact to DxEcch May 16 2007

Fact #2

"I would argue that the most serious threat to the United States is
not someone hiding in a cave in Afghanistan But our own fiscal
irresposibility."
David Walker, comptroller General of the Unied States...March 2007

(OT) : The Canadian National Psychosis - American Envy !
 

"ve3..." wrote:

On May 14, 9:22 pm, dxAce wrote:
"ve3..." wrote:
On May 14, 6:24 pm, D Peter Maus wrote:
ve3... wrote:
There will be no unanswered insults. If you stop telling lies
about Canada, I will stop telling the truth about the US.

Funny. That's exactly what's happening from down here. Someone
got tired of the gratuitous insults from Canada, and took a 'no insult
unanswered' stance.

So, again, you're bitching because someone hit you back first.

Canadian insults stop, US insults will stop.

Your call.

I suppose you come by it honestly. When your PM levies personal
insults at our President, it kind of becomes national policy.

Get your facts right. Stephen Harper, the Prime Minister, has his
head so far up Bush's ass he needs assistants to hold his shoelaces.
Harper, a well-known neocon, can't call an election because his
ratings are too low. Please cite the occasion where Harper insulted
Bush.

And here we have it. History starts at a random point of
convenience. Go back one PM. The aide to Chretien that called Bush a
moron in an official memo. He resigned. Interestingly, however, he was
not fired by Chretien, nor was the remark retracted by the PM.

So, you get YOUR facts, straight, buckwheat. History doesn't
start with your entry into the fray. And you don't get to start a 'no
insult unanswered' retaliation when it was your countrymen who started
the insult fest first.

"Mii," and "MichaelMoore" have been taking gratuitous shots at
the US since long before you showed your handle here. Had you done your
own homework, gotten your own facts straight, you would have known that.
But then, you're Canadian, and beyond the reach of criticism, aren't you?

No insult unanswered, indeed.

I suppose you don't know that the Anti-US insults came across
the border for weeks unanswered before some members here started let no
insult go unanswered. But then, why would you. Everyone knows there are
no enemies on the Left...or to the North. That you are, by geography, if
not politics, beyond the reach of criticism. And that you must let no
insult go unanswered. If for no other reason than to assert your
righteousness.

No insult unaswered, indeed.

Arrogance in DNA. You let your countrymen lob shots across the
border, and then you object to the response with indignation.

"MOM, he hit me back first."

"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""" """""""""
First of all, I consider your calling me "buckwheat" a gratuitous
insult so you had better get ready for some "incoming."

Who gives a rats ass what *you* consider.

(1) You make a big fuss about "getting your facts right." Why don't
you follow your own advice? "Go back one PM." That would be John
Turner. If you are talking about Chretien, that's back TWO PM's. When
you say "your PM" I think it quite reasonable to think you are
referring to the present PM. And the aide was a "she" not a "he."
Great example of "getting your facts straight."

PM? Does that stand for PussyMan? In CanaDuhs case I guess it does.

(2) You say history starts at a random point of convenience.
Convenient to who? You?

Better him than a dumbass Canuck.

How far back do you want to go? Chretien
didn't like Bush. Diefenbaker didn't like Kennedy. King didn't like
Roosevelt.........

Seems like a pattern! Dumbass Canucks behaving like dumbass Canucks.

Go figure, I don't like dumbass Canucks.



Cartier thought the Jamestown settlers were trailer trash.

Wrong! Canucks are trailer trash.

So what?

You have to set the terms of reference at the beginning of the
discussion, not when you want to shift your argument.

My term of reference is that there seems to be an abundance of dumbass Canucks.

That's why I
ignored your previous rant about terrorists and Al-quieda about which
you objected.

Keep ignoring those folks and there will be a prayer rug in your sorry ass
future.

Aw, what was I thinking! You present is pretty sorry ass!

It had nothing to do with the topic we were discussing.
Please stay on topic and stop dragging red herrings across the thread.

(3) I admit that I didn't know about the early feud, but I speak for
myself so it is not relevant. I don't think Cato got a fair shake just
because he was Canadian and he knew nothing about the earlier feud but
some of the inhabitants of this site are close to psychotic and were
drooling at the prospect of a new victim.

Drooling? Isn't that what you psychotic Canucks spend a lot of time doing?
Drooling over the USofA.

To sum up: I will not initiate an insult but if you think I will
ignore one you have another think coming.

Run along now!- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""" """"""""
VE3 insult return fact to DxEcch May 16 2007

Fact #2

"I would argue that the most serious threat to the United States is
not someone hiding in a cave in Afghanistan But our own fiscal
irresposibility."
David Walker, comptroller General of the Unied States...March 2007

You just don't get it, do you boy? Oh well, that's the dumbass Canuck way!

(OT) : The Canadian National Psychosis - American Envy !
 

snipped the irrelevant and immature refuse...


VE3 insult return fact to DxEcch May 16 2007

Fact #2

"I would argue that the most serious threat to the United States is
not someone hiding in a cave in Afghanistan But our own fiscal
irresposibility."
David Walker, comptroller General of the Unied States...March 2007


If we weren't chasing them around those caves in Afghanistan, they would be
chasing you around your neighborhood. Hope you got your AK 47 locked and
loaded mr canadian. You really need to get your head out of the sand and
realize these guys are gonna kill you just because you're over here. They
don't care who you are. You should be GRATEFUL that OUR troops are in
Afghanistan keeping them in those caves.
B

(OT) : The Canadian National Psychosis - American Envy !
 

On May 16, 2:00 pm, dxAce wrote:
"ve3..." wrote:
On May 14, 10:52 pm, D Peter Maus wrote:
ve3... wrote:
(3) I admit that I didn't know about the early feud, but I speak for
myself so it is not relevant.

I am not resposible for what someone else says on the site whether he
is a Canadian or not. I AM resposible for what I say and I make every
effort to tell the truth

So, history begins and ends with you.

The history of my postings begins with me.. how else could it be?

I had no idea you were so significant.

That's your opinion, not mine.

You may consider me properly awed.

You're odd alright.

It's not often that I find someone so determined to perpetuate a
bitchfest that they admit to not caring about the facts.

I challenge you to find one of my facts that is wrong.

Nice going.

You're welcome

"Mommy...he hit me back first."

Please get past the childish level.
"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""" """""""""""""""""""""

Your post does, however raise a question that I have been hunting for
because the thoughts are alien to Canadians. It is, pure and simple,
the American trait to discriminate which is based on the First
Amendment.
Europe, Britain, and Canada all have laws against discrimination.
It is unlawful to discriminate against a person because of race,
religion, national origin, etc. It does not even occur to a Canadian
that he would be discriminated against because of his national origin.
It's just not done. So that is why Canadians signing on to this
website, as they have a perfect right to do, are immediately attacked
by a local gang, who, I hasten to add, in no way represent the
friendly Americans I am used to.
Well boys, have your fun, because the Hate Speech laws currently
going through Congress, and they will pass, will make it Illegal to
speak against a person because of his national origin..All it would
take is a complaint, backed up by web evidence, to get an ambitious
Federal Prosecuting Attorney on your case.
The free-wheeling days of slurs, insults, and name-calling are
coming to a close. If I were you, I would weigh my words carefully in
future.

How does pointing out the fact that you're a dumbass Canuck equate to being
"Hate Speech"?- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""" """""""""
I would read the proposed bills in the Senate and House of
Representatives. If the US bills are the same as the Canadian and US
bills (they have the same authors) you will find out if you keep it
up. I will observe with interest

(OT) : The Canadian National Psychosis - American Envy !
 

"ve3..." wrote:

On May 16, 2:00 pm, dxAce wrote:
"ve3..." wrote:
On May 14, 10:52 pm, D Peter Maus wrote:
ve3... wrote:
(3) I admit that I didn't know about the early feud, but I speak for
myself so it is not relevant.

I am not resposible for what someone else says on the site whether he
is a Canadian or not. I AM resposible for what I say and I make every
effort to tell the truth

So, history begins and ends with you.

The history of my postings begins with me.. how else could it be?

I had no idea you were so significant.

That's your opinion, not mine.

You may consider me properly awed.

You're odd alright.

It's not often that I find someone so determined to perpetuate a
bitchfest that they admit to not caring about the facts.

I challenge you to find one of my facts that is wrong.

Nice going.

You're welcome

"Mommy...he hit me back first."

Please get past the childish level.
"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""" """""""""""""""""""""

Your post does, however raise a question that I have been hunting for
because the thoughts are alien to Canadians. It is, pure and simple,
the American trait to discriminate which is based on the First
Amendment.
Europe, Britain, and Canada all have laws against discrimination.
It is unlawful to discriminate against a person because of race,
religion, national origin, etc. It does not even occur to a Canadian
that he would be discriminated against because of his national origin.
It's just not done. So that is why Canadians signing on to this
website, as they have a perfect right to do, are immediately attacked
by a local gang, who, I hasten to add, in no way represent the
friendly Americans I am used to.
Well boys, have your fun, because the Hate Speech laws currently
going through Congress, and they will pass, will make it Illegal to
speak against a person because of his national origin..All it would
take is a complaint, backed up by web evidence, to get an ambitious
Federal Prosecuting Attorney on your case.
The free-wheeling days of slurs, insults, and name-calling are
coming to a close. If I were you, I would weigh my words carefully in
future.

How does pointing out the fact that you're a dumbass Canuck equate to being
"Hate Speech"?- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""" """""""""
I would read the proposed bills in the Senate and House of
Representatives. If the US bills are the same as the Canadian and US
bills (they have the same authors) you will find out if you keep it
up. I will observe with interest

You do that, and I think you'll find that I'll be pointing out that you're a
dumbass Canuck for some time to come.

LMFAO at the dumbass yet again.

dxAce
Michigan
USA

(OT) : The Canadian National Psychosis - American Envy !
 

On May 15, 10:00 pm, Telamon
wrote:
In article ,
D Peter Maus wrote:





ve3... wrote:
On May 12, 6:27 pm, Telamon
wrote:
Would you please stop the USA VS Canada crap posts.

Telamon
Ventura, California
"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""" """""""""
I know the truth hurts and you want it to all go away. It is simple.
Stop posting insults to Canada and I will stop replying. Please note
that all my posts have been provoked. I have much better things to do
but if an insult is posted, I will reply in kind.

Since Telamon doesn't post insults until insulted, your argument is
very much the 5 year old screaming, "Mom!--He hit me back FIRST."

Since this BS originated north of the border....if you stop, he will
have nothing to pursue. If you stop, Ace will have nothing to which me
might respond.

I know the truth hurts and you want desperately to be blameless,
but, it's simple....you're not.

Stop your gratuitous shots at the US, and the in-kind replies will
stop.

I suppose you come by it honestly. When your PM levies personal
insults at our President, it kind of becomes national policy.

Pretty hypocritical to live off the fat of our economy, while
insulting our officials. Especially in light of the US involvement in
thwarting the attack on a Canadian city.

Keep it up, and we'll send back Shatner.

I don't logically expect the Trolling idiots to stop this off topic
thread, I was hoping other normal people that post to the news group to
stop. Oh well.

--
Telamon
Ventura, California- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""" """""""""""'
This is pretty sloppy work. I expected better attention to detail from
you. You have listed four points that have been refuted and
unanswered, including one of your own. You have to read all the posts,
as I did, to get the complete pcture. I would suggest you consider
this as a first draft and review your material for a second draft.
If you decide to let this one stand, I will respond in three days.

(OT) : The Canadian National Psychosis - American Envy !
 

On May 16, 2:00 pm, dxAce wrote:


How does pointing out the fact that you're a dumbass Canuck equate to being
"Hate Speech"?- Hide quoted text -
"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""" """""""""""""
CANADIAN HATE SPEECH LAW: Coming soon to a DA near you.
For the full summary Google "Canadian Hate Speech Law"
The section of interest (setion 13) is posted below.

Section 13 of the Canadian Human Rights Act prohibis the
communicationby means of a telecommunication undertaking (including
the internet) of messages that are likely to expose a person to hatred
or contempt on the basis of:
race
national or ethnic origin
colour
religion
age
sex
sexual orientation
marital status
family status
disability
conviction for which a pardon has been granted.

Of course, the US version may use different wording, but the concepts
are the same in Europe and Britain. I haven't checked Australia.
Violations of the act are subject to the Criminal code. In the US they
would be felonies. Heavy s..t. Now you may have some kind of death
wish and want to take on a Federal prosecutor but I wouldn't want to
spend a year scurrying around corners looking out for Bubba.

(OT) : The Canadian National Psychosis - American Envy !
 

"ve3..." wrote:

On May 16, 2:00 pm, dxAce wrote:


How does pointing out the fact that you're a dumbass Canuck equate to being
"Hate Speech"?- Hide quoted text -
"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""" """""""""""""
CANADIAN HATE SPEECH LAW: Coming soon to a DA near you.
For the full summary Google "Canadian Hate Speech Law"
The section of interest (setion 13) is posted below.

Section 13 of the Canadian Human Rights Act prohibis the
communicationby means of a telecommunication undertaking (including
the internet) of messages that are likely to expose a person to hatred
or contempt on the basis of:
race
national or ethnic origin
colour
religion
age
sex
sexual orientation
marital status
family status
disability
conviction for which a pardon has been granted.

Of course, the US version may use different wording, but the concepts
are the same in Europe and Britain. I haven't checked Australia.
Violations of the act are subject to the Criminal code. In the US they
would be felonies. Heavy s..t. Now you may have some kind of death
wish and want to take on a Federal prosecutor but I wouldn't want to
spend a year scurrying around corners looking out for Bubba.

Do dumbass Canucks scurry?

(OT) : The Canadian National Psychosis - American Envy !
 

Brian O wrote:
snipped the irrelevant and immature refuse...


VE3 insult return fact to DxEcch May 16 2007

Fact #2

"I would argue that the most serious threat to the United States is
not someone hiding in a cave in Afghanistan But our own fiscal
irresposibility."
David Walker, comptroller General of the Unied States...March 2007


If we weren't chasing them around those caves in Afghanistan, they would be
chasing you around your neighborhood. Hope you got your AK 47 locked and
loaded mr canadian. You really need to get your head out of the sand and
realize these guys are gonna kill you just because you're over here. They
don't care who you are. You should be GRATEFUL that OUR troops are in
Afghanistan keeping them in those caves.
B




Why are attacks and violence at all-time high if the troops are keeping
the Taliban hiding in caves? There's mo some of them have found a new
home in Pakistan.

I'm in favour of the war against the Taliban and against the war in Iraq
but both operations were done in a half-assed manner.

JB

(OT) : The Canadian National Psychosis - American Envy !
 

D Peter Maus wrote:
John Barnard wrote:
D Peter Maus wrote:
ve3... wrote:
On May 12, 6:27 pm, Telamon
wrote:
Would you please stop the USA VS Canada crap posts.

Telamon
Ventura, California
"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""" """""""""
I know the truth hurts and you want it to all go away. It is simple.
Stop posting insults to Canada and I will stop replying. Please note
that all my posts have been provoked. I have much better things to do
but if an insult is posted, I will reply in kind.





Since Telamon doesn't post insults until insulted, your argument
is very much the 5 year old screaming, "Mom!--He hit me back FIRST."


Since this BS originated north of the border....if you stop, he
will have nothing to pursue. If you stop, Ace will have nothing to
which me might respond.


I know the truth hurts and you want desperately to be blameless,
but, it's simple....you're not.


Stop your gratuitous shots at the US, and the in-kind replies will
stop.

I suppose you come by it honestly. When your PM levies personal
insults at our President, it kind of becomes national policy.

Fortunately, he's not PM anymore. Personally, I couldn't stand the
bast*rd!


Pretty hypocritical to live off the fat of our economy, while
insulting our officials. Especially in light of the US involvement
in thwarting the attack on a Canadian city.

Keep it up, and we'll send back Shatner.


We'll take Shatner off your hands and you get to keep Celine Dion.


LOL! Now that's just plain mean.

Sorry, Peter, it was just too good of an opportunity to take ;-).

JB

(OT) : VE3 - So There Is NO Discrimination In Canada
 

On May 16, 9:57 am, "ve3..." wrote:
On May 14, 10:52 pm, D Peter Maus wrote:

ve3... wrote:
(3) I admit that I didn't know about the early feud, but I speak for
myself so it is not relevant.

I am not resposible for what someone else says on the site whether he
is a Canadian or not. I AM resposible for what I say and I make every
effort to tell the truth



So, history begins and ends with you.

The history of my postings begins with me.. how else could it be?



I had no idea you were so significant.

That's your opinion, not mine.



You may consider me properly awed.

You're odd alright.



It's not often that I find someone so determined to perpetuate a
bitchfest that they admit to not caring about the facts.

I challenge you to find one of my facts that is wrong.



Nice going.

You're welcome

"Mommy...he hit me back first."

Please get past the childish level.
"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""" """""""""""""""""""""

Your post does, however raise a question that I have been hunting for
because the thoughts are alien to Canadians. It is, pure and simple,
the American trait to discriminate which is based on the First
Amendment.
Europe, Britain, and Canada all have laws against discrimination.
It is unlawful to discriminate against a person because of race,
religion, national origin, etc. It does not even occur to a Canadian
that he would be discriminated against because of his national origin.
It's just not done. So that is why Canadians signing on to this
website, as they have a perfect right to do, are immediately attacked
by a local gang, who, I hasten to add, in no way represent the
friendly Americans I am used to.
Well boys, have your fun, because the Hate Speech laws currently
going through Congress, and they will pass, will make it Illegal to
speak against a person because of his national origin..All it would
take is a complaint, backed up by web evidence, to get an ambitious
Federal Prosecuting Attorney on your case.
The free-wheeling days of slurs, insults, and name-calling are
coming to a close. If I were you, I would weigh my words carefully in
future.

VE3 - So there is NO 'discrimination' in Canada
- - - Wow - That Boggles the Mind ~ RHF
Note - I am sure that the First Peoples will be
oh so glad to hear that !

VE3 - Your History Lesson for Americans about their
very own US Constitution is that the First Amendment
'allows' Americans to Discriminate and it in American's
"Nature" to Discriminate.
- - - Oh Mister High and Mighty - That's a Big One ~ RHF

WHAT DOES - The First Amemdment Really Say . . .
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/First_Amendment
- - - The Concept of "Freedom of Speech" in the USofA
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Freedom..._United_States
Lets see . . . Freedom of Speech -vice- Hate Speech
The Right To Speak Freely -vice- Limited Speech
Imposed by Government Intimidation of Speech.
- - - Well I CHOOSE : Freedom of Speech and The Right
To Speak Freely -sorry- If You Hate To Hear That !

VE3 - Clearly 'you' are an exceptional individual who is
no mere Canadian -butt- Someone who has reached the
Exalted Level of The Order of the American Bashers (OAB)
with the ceremonial title of "Sir Can-A-Duh-Ian".
- - - All Hail to VE3 the Ayatollah of Can-A-Dee-Olah !

(OT) : The Canadian National Psychosis - American Envy !
 

On May 16, 11:00 am, dxAce wrote:
"ve3..." wrote:
On May 14, 10:52 pm, D Peter Maus wrote:
ve3... wrote:
(3) I admit that I didn't know about the early feud, but I speak for
myself so it is not relevant.

I am not resposible for what someone else says on the site whether he
is a Canadian or not. I AM resposible for what I say and I make every
effort to tell the truth

So, history begins and ends with you.

The history of my postings begins with me.. how else could it be?

I had no idea you were so significant.

That's your opinion, not mine.

You may consider me properly awed.

You're odd alright.

It's not often that I find someone so determined to perpetuate a
bitchfest that they admit to not caring about the facts.

I challenge you to find one of my facts that is wrong.

Nice going.

You're welcome

"Mommy...he hit me back first."

Please get past the childish level.
"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""" """""""""""""""""""""

Your post does, however raise a question that I have been hunting for
because the thoughts are alien to Canadians. It is, pure and simple,
the American trait to discriminate which is based on the First
Amendment.
Europe, Britain, and Canada all have laws against discrimination.
It is unlawful to discriminate against a person because of race,
religion, national origin, etc. It does not even occur to a Canadian
that he would be discriminated against because of his national origin.
It's just not done. So that is why Canadians signing on to this
website, as they have a perfect right to do, are immediately attacked
by a local gang, who, I hasten to add, in no way represent the
friendly Americans I am used to.
Well boys, have your fun, because the Hate Speech laws currently
going through Congress, and they will pass, will make it Illegal to
speak against a person because of his national origin..All it would
take is a complaint, backed up by web evidence, to get an ambitious
Federal Prosecuting Attorney on your case.
The free-wheeling days of slurs, insults, and name-calling are
coming to a close. If I were you, I would weigh my words carefully in
future.

How does pointing out the fact that you're a dumbass Canuck equate to being
"Hate Speech"?- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

The Truth Hurts and -if- It Hurts - It's Hate [.]
-cause- It is Hateful to point out the Truth to
an O-Glorious-Exhaled-Can-A-Duh-Ian . . .
It makes their pea-brains hurt and causes
them unending pain. Oh the Pain of Being
a Can-A-Duh-Ian - A Life Time of Almost
Being an American - it just hurts . . . ~ RHF

(OT) : VE3 - So There Is NO Discrimination In Canada
 

RHF wrote:

On May 16, 9:57 am, "ve3..." wrote:
On May 14, 10:52 pm, D Peter Maus wrote:

ve3... wrote:
(3) I admit that I didn't know about the early feud, but I speak for
myself so it is not relevant.

I am not resposible for what someone else says on the site whether he
is a Canadian or not. I AM resposible for what I say and I make every
effort to tell the truth



So, history begins and ends with you.

The history of my postings begins with me.. how else could it be?



I had no idea you were so significant.

That's your opinion, not mine.



You may consider me properly awed.

You're odd alright.



It's not often that I find someone so determined to perpetuate a
bitchfest that they admit to not caring about the facts.

I challenge you to find one of my facts that is wrong.



Nice going.

You're welcome

"Mommy...he hit me back first."

Please get past the childish level.
"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""" """""""""""""""""""""

Your post does, however raise a question that I have been hunting for
because the thoughts are alien to Canadians. It is, pure and simple,
the American trait to discriminate which is based on the First
Amendment.
Europe, Britain, and Canada all have laws against discrimination.
It is unlawful to discriminate against a person because of race,
religion, national origin, etc. It does not even occur to a Canadian
that he would be discriminated against because of his national origin.
It's just not done. So that is why Canadians signing on to this
website, as they have a perfect right to do, are immediately attacked
by a local gang, who, I hasten to add, in no way represent the
friendly Americans I am used to.
Well boys, have your fun, because the Hate Speech laws currently
going through Congress, and they will pass, will make it Illegal to
speak against a person because of his national origin..All it would
take is a complaint, backed up by web evidence, to get an ambitious
Federal Prosecuting Attorney on your case.
The free-wheeling days of slurs, insults, and name-calling are
coming to a close. If I were you, I would weigh my words carefully in
future.

VE3 - So there is NO 'discrimination' in Canada
- - - Wow - That Boggles the Mind ~ RHF
Note - I am sure that the First Peoples will be
oh so glad to hear that !

That was just more Canuck BS on his part.



VE3 - Your History Lesson for Americans about their
very own US Constitution is that the First Amendment
'allows' Americans to Discriminate and it in American's
"Nature" to Discriminate.
- - - Oh Mister High and Mighty - That's a Big One ~ RHF

WHAT DOES - The First Amemdment Really Say . . .
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/First_Amendment
- - - The Concept of "Freedom of Speech" in the USofA
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Freedom..._United_States
Lets see . . . Freedom of Speech -vice- Hate Speech
The Right To Speak Freely -vice- Limited Speech
Imposed by Government Intimidation of Speech.
- - - Well I CHOOSE : Freedom of Speech and The Right
To Speak Freely -sorry- If You Hate To Hear That !

VE3 - Clearly 'you' are an exceptional individual who is
no mere Canadian -butt- Someone who has reached the
Exalted Level of The Order of the American Bashers (OAB)
with the ceremonial title of "Sir Can-A-Duh-Ian".
- - - All Hail to VE3 the Ayatollah of Can-A-Dee-Olah !
.
.
. .

yes - thank god {allah} i am an american - amen ~ RHF
.
.
. .

(OT) : The Canadian National Psychosis - American Envy !
 

On May 16, 1:18 pm, "ve3..." wrote:
On May 14, 9:22 pm, dxAce wrote:





"ve3..." wrote:
On May 14, 6:24 pm, D Peter Maus wrote:
ve3... wrote:
There will be no unanswered insults. If you stop telling lies
about Canada, I will stop telling the truth about the US.

Funny. That's exactly what's happening from down here. Someone
got tired of the gratuitous insults from Canada, and took a 'no insult
unanswered' stance.

So, again, you're bitching because someone hit you back first.

Canadian insults stop, US insults will stop.

Your call.

I suppose you come by it honestly. When your PM levies personal
insults at our President, it kind of becomes national policy.

Get your facts right. Stephen Harper, the Prime Minister, has his
head so far up Bush's ass he needs assistants to hold his shoelaces.
Harper, a well-known neocon, can't call an election because his
ratings are too low. Please cite the occasion where Harper insulted
Bush.

And here we have it. History starts at a random point of
convenience. Go back one PM. The aide to Chretien that called Bush a
moron in an official memo. He resigned. Interestingly, however, he was
not fired by Chretien, nor was the remark retracted by the PM.

So, you get YOUR facts, straight, buckwheat. History doesn't
start with your entry into the fray. And you don't get to start a 'no
insult unanswered' retaliation when it was your countrymen who started
the insult fest first.

"Mii," and "MichaelMoore" have been taking gratuitous shots at
the US since long before you showed your handle here. Had you done your
own homework, gotten your own facts straight, you would have known that.
But then, you're Canadian, and beyond the reach of criticism, aren't you?

No insult unanswered, indeed.

I suppose you don't know that the Anti-US insults came across
the border for weeks unanswered before some members here started let no
insult go unanswered. But then, why would you. Everyone knows there are
no enemies on the Left...or to the North. That you are, by geography, if
not politics, beyond the reach of criticism. And that you must let no
insult go unanswered. If for no other reason than to assert your
righteousness.

No insult unaswered, indeed.

Arrogance in DNA. You let your countrymen lob shots across the
border, and then you object to the response with indignation.

"MOM, he hit me back first."

"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""" """""""""
First of all, I consider your calling me "buckwheat" a gratuitous
insult so you had better get ready for some "incoming."

Who gives a rats ass what *you* consider.

(1) You make a big fuss about "getting your facts right." Why don't
you follow your own advice? "Go back one PM." That would be John
Turner. If you are talking about Chretien, that's back TWO PM's. When
you say "your PM" I think it quite reasonable to think you are
referring to the present PM. And the aide was a "she" not a "he."
Great example of "getting your facts straight."

PM? Does that stand for PussyMan? In CanaDuhs case I guess it does.

(2) You say history starts at a random point of convenience.
Convenient to who? You?

Better him than a dumbass Canuck.

How far back do you want to go? Chretien
didn't like Bush. Diefenbaker didn't like Kennedy. King didn't like
Roosevelt.........

Seems like a pattern! Dumbass Canucks behaving like dumbass Canucks.

Go figure, I don't like dumbass Canucks.

Cartier thought the Jamestown settlers were trailer trash.

Wrong! Canucks are trailer trash.

So what?

You have to set the terms of reference at the beginning of the
discussion, not when you want to shift your argument.

My term of reference is that there seems to be an abundance of dumbass Canucks.

That's why I
ignored your previous rant about terrorists and Al-quieda about which
you objected.

Keep ignoring those folks and there will be a prayer rug in your sorry ass
future.

Aw, what was I thinking! You present is pretty sorry ass!

It had nothing to do with the topic we were discussing.
Please stay on topic and stop dragging red herrings across the thread.

(3) I admit that I didn't know about the early feud, but I speak for
myself so it is not relevant. I don't think Cato got a fair shake just
because he was Canadian and he knew nothing about the earlier feud but
some of the inhabitants of this site are close to psychotic and were
drooling at the prospect of a new victim.

Drooling? Isn't that what you psychotic Canucks spend a lot of time doing?
Drooling over the USofA.

To sum up: I will not initiate an insult but if you think I will
ignore one you have another think coming.

Run along now!- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""" """"""""
VE3 insult return fact to DxEcch May 16 2007

Fact #2

"I would argue that the most serious threat to the United States is
not someone hiding in a cave in Afghanistan But our own fiscal
irresposibility."
David Walker, comptroller General of the Unied States...March 2007- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

VE3 - Ain't America Great ! - Freedom of Speech -and-
The Right To Be Wrong - Even When You Are Right !
The Right To Be Right - Even When You Are Wrong !

as for canada . . . oh never mind ~ RHF

(OT) : The Canadian National Psychosis - American Envy !
 

On May 16, 4:19 pm, "Brian O" wrote:
snipped the irrelevant and immature refuse...

VE3 insult return fact to DxEcch May 16 2007

Fact #2

"I would argue that the most serious threat to the United States is
not someone hiding in a cave in Afghanistan But our own fiscal
irresposibility."
David Walker, comptroller General of the Unied States...March 2007

If we weren't chasing them around those caves in Afghanistan, they would be
chasing you around your neighborhood. Hope you got your AK 47 locked and
loaded mr canadian. You really need to get your head out of the sand and
realize these guys are gonna kill you just because you're over here. They
don't care who you are. You should be GRATEFUL that OUR troops are in
Afghanistan keeping them in those caves.
B

Brian O - Canada has Troops in Afghanistan Too.

However the Caliphate {Islamic Rule} of Canada
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Caliphate
is coming soon to America's Northern Neighbor.

Sharia {Islamic} Law is now being practiced in Canada
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/4215182.stm
http://www.youmeworks.com/sharia_canada.html
http://www.nosharia.com/

it would seem that canada has rolled-over
and is ready to submit to islamic rule ~ RHF

(OT) : The Canadian National Psychosis - American Envy !
 

Brian O wrote:

"John Barnard" wrote in message
news:gdQ2i.188168$DE1.171384@pd7urf2no...
Brian O wrote:
snipped the irrelevant and immature refuse...


VE3 insult return fact to DxEcch May 16 2007

Fact #2

"I would argue that the most serious threat to the United States is
not someone hiding in a cave in Afghanistan But our own fiscal
irresposibility."
David Walker, comptroller General of the Unied States...March 2007


If we weren't chasing them around those caves in Afghanistan, they would
be
chasing you around your neighborhood. Hope you got your AK 47 locked
and
loaded mr canadian. You really need to get your head out of the sand
and
realize these guys are gonna kill you just because you're over here.
They
don't care who you are. You should be GRATEFUL that OUR troops are in
Afghanistan keeping them in those caves.
B




Why are attacks and violence at all-time high if the troops are keeping
the Taliban hiding in caves? There's mo some of them have found a new
home in Pakistan.

I'm in favour of the war against the Taliban and against the war in Iraq
but both operations were done in a half-assed manner.

JB
Tell that to the Russians when they tried to go in and get the Taliban out
of the caves. Better yet, lets send you over there to straighten them out.
Bet that would work out real well too huh? You dont seem to get the point at
all. If they are fighting them over there, they arent chasing your sorry
self around over here.

If they were chasing Barnyard, or any other Canuck around they'd be crying their
eyes out begging for help from the US of A.

(OT) : The Canadian National Psychosis - American Envy !
 

"John Barnard" wrote in message
news:gdQ2i.188168$DE1.171384@pd7urf2no...
Brian O wrote:
snipped the irrelevant and immature refuse...


VE3 insult return fact to DxEcch May 16 2007

Fact #2

"I would argue that the most serious threat to the United States is
not someone hiding in a cave in Afghanistan But our own fiscal
irresposibility."
David Walker, comptroller General of the Unied States...March 2007


If we weren't chasing them around those caves in Afghanistan, they would
be
chasing you around your neighborhood. Hope you got your AK 47 locked
and
loaded mr canadian. You really need to get your head out of the sand
and
realize these guys are gonna kill you just because you're over here.
They
don't care who you are. You should be GRATEFUL that OUR troops are in
Afghanistan keeping them in those caves.
B




Why are attacks and violence at all-time high if the troops are keeping
the Taliban hiding in caves? There's mo some of them have found a new
home in Pakistan.

I'm in favour of the war against the Taliban and against the war in Iraq
but both operations were done in a half-assed manner.

JB
Tell that to the Russians when they tried to go in and get the Taliban out
of the caves. Better yet, lets send you over there to straighten them out.
Bet that would work out real well too huh? You dont seem to get the point at
all. If they are fighting them over there, they arent chasing your sorry
self around over here.
B

(OT) : The Canadian National Psychosis - American Envy !
 

"RHF" wrote in message
oups.com...
On May 16, 4:19 pm, "Brian O" wrote:
snipped the irrelevant and immature refuse...

VE3 insult return fact to DxEcch May 16 2007

Fact #2

"I would argue that the most serious threat to the United States is
not someone hiding in a cave in Afghanistan But our own fiscal
irresposibility."
David Walker, comptroller General of the Unied States...March 2007

If we weren't chasing them around those caves in Afghanistan, they would
be
chasing you around your neighborhood. Hope you got your AK 47 locked
and
loaded mr canadian. You really need to get your head out of the sand
and
realize these guys are gonna kill you just because you're over here.
They
don't care who you are. You should be GRATEFUL that OUR troops are in
Afghanistan keeping them in those caves.
B

Brian O - Canada has Troops in Afghanistan Too.

However the Caliphate {Islamic Rule} of Canada
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Caliphate
is coming soon to America's Northern Neighbor.

Sharia {Islamic} Law is now being practiced in Canada
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/4215182.stm
http://www.youmeworks.com/sharia_canada.html
http://www.nosharia.com/

it would seem that canada has rolled-over
and is ready to submit to islamic rule ~ RHF
.
They may have troops, but they arent there in nearly the force we are, and
are not nearly pouring in as much money as we do. Until they do, they dont
have any reason to talk. I havent heard of any Canuck troops being killed in
Afganistan or Iraq lately.
B

(OT) : The Canadian National Psychosis - American Envy !
 

On May 16, 7:19 pm, "Brian O" wrote:
snipped the irrelevant and immature refuse...

VE3 insult return fact to DxEcch May 16 2007

Fact #2

"I would argue that the most serious threat to the United States is
not someone hiding in a cave in Afghanistan But our own fiscal
irresposibility."
David Walker, comptroller General of the Unied States...March 2007

If we weren't chasing them around those caves in Afghanistan, they would be
chasing you around your neighborhood. Hope you got your AK 47 locked and
loaded mr canadian. You really need to get your head out of the sand and
realize these guys are gonna kill you just because you're over here. They
don't care who you are. You should be GRATEFUL that OUR troops are in
Afghanistan keeping them in those caves.
B
"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""" """""""
I am afraid that your dispute is with David Walker, Comptroller
General of the United States. I am but a mere scribe reporting an item
about American life that I thought might be of interest. I have no
opinion about the matter, I just report. Let us know how your letter
to Mr. Walker is received.

(OT) : The Canadian National Psychosis - American Envy !
 

"ve3..." wrote:

On May 16, 7:19 pm, "Brian O" wrote:
snipped the irrelevant and immature refuse...

VE3 insult return fact to DxEcch May 16 2007

Fact #2

"I would argue that the most serious threat to the United States is
not someone hiding in a cave in Afghanistan But our own fiscal
irresposibility."
David Walker, comptroller General of the Unied States...March 2007

If we weren't chasing them around those caves in Afghanistan, they would be
chasing you around your neighborhood. Hope you got your AK 47 locked and
loaded mr canadian. You really need to get your head out of the sand and
realize these guys are gonna kill you just because you're over here. They
don't care who you are. You should be GRATEFUL that OUR troops are in
Afghanistan keeping them in those caves.
B
"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""" """""""
I am afraid that your dispute is with David Walker, Comptroller
General of the United States. I am but a mere scribe reporting an item
about American life that I thought might be of interest. I have no
opinion about the matter, I just report. Let us know how your letter
to Mr. Walker is received.

You have no opinion? Surely that is just more Canuck BS.

LMFAO at the dumbass yet again.

dxAce
Michigan
USA

(OT) : The Canadian National Psychosis - American Envy !
 

WHERE IN THE WORLD IS CARMEN DXECCHIO?

Since DxEcch slavers and drools when he reads my posts, looking for
anything he can make a big deal of, I deliberately inserted a factual
error in the last ten days. DxEcch, possibly into some serious
drinking at the time, missed it.
The award "VE3 EAGLE EYE" will be awarded to the winner. You say
that's not enough? You say you want more? Tell you what I'm gonna do.
I will stay off this website for a month if you find it!!! Now we're
talking serious incentive! Contest ends midnight est Saturday.

(OT) : The Canadian National Psychosis - American Envy !
 

On May 15, 4:20 am, "ve3..." wrote:
THE WIT AND WISDOM OF THE USA VS CANADA ANSWERS

I have selected comments from this thread. Can you identify the
author?
The list of usual suspects. M II, Telemon, RHF, Maus, Cuhulin, DxAce,
Cato, Beerbar, Tootles, VE3, miki.

(1) I don't spend my time meddling in the affairs of another
country....I'm 47 and will be returning for my third trip (tour of
duty) soon. BEERBAR

(2) The rest of the world should damn well fear us Americans..RHF

(3) If you really understood economics you'd shut your pie hole..MAUS

(4) It's a mean world out there-and-the big boys play the game of
hardball with the heads of the meek....RHF

(5) If you are expecting any kind of factual rebuttal from the name-
callers, please don't hold your breath....TOMMY TOOTLES

(6) My only hope is that most Americans do not forget the principles
on which their country was founded....CATO

(7) DxAce is a prime example. A real stupid idiotic jerk and he keeps
proving it every time he opens his mouth...CATO

(8) Youre a real stupid idiotic Canuck....DXACE

(9) Stop whining, pay attention, run along, and get a cb radio...VE3

(10) Other than a pile of empty bottles, you have absolutely nothing
going for you yet you are extremely impolite....M II

(11) Would you please stop the USA vs Canada crap posts..TELEMON

(12) I am not a redneck.....CUHULIN

(13) HOOHOOHOOHAWHAW....erk...koff...koff....MIKI

In reviewing the thread, I was impressed by the effort many had put into composing something useful. May their tribe increase.

1 - 3 identified Normal
4 - 8 identified You are in danger of having you mind corrupted:
beware
9 - 12 identified You have way too much free time on your hands
13 identified Get a Life...Seek help.

(OT) : The Canadian National Psychosis - American Envy !
 

"ve3duh..." wrote:

WHERE IN THE WORLD IS CARMEN DXECCHIO?

Since DxEcch slavers and drools when he reads my posts, looking for
anything he can make a big deal of, I deliberately inserted a factual
error in the last ten days.

What about all the ones that were not deliberate, dumbass?

DxEcch, possibly into some serious
drinking at the time, missed it.
The award "VE3 EAGLE EYE" will be awarded to the winner. You say
that's not enough? You say you want more? Tell you what I'm gonna do.
I will stay off this website for a month if you find it!!! Now we're
talking serious incentive! Contest ends midnight est Saturday.

Find a contest where you'll stay outta here for twenty years and you just might
pique my interest.

(OT) : The Canadian National Psychosis - American Envy !
 

On May 17, 1:45 pm, dxAce wrote:


LMFAO at the dumbass yet again.

dxAce
Michigan
USA- Hide quoted text -
"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""" """""""'
You should stop laughing and drinking long enough to look for the
factual error I planted for you. How could you miss it? Pay attention.

(OT) : The Canadian National Psychosis - American Envy !
 

On May 17, 2:16 pm, dxAce wrote:
"ve3duh..." wrote:

Since DxEcch slavers and drools when he reads my posts, looking for anything he can make a big deal of, I deliberately inserted a factual
error in the last ten days.


What about all the ones that were not deliberate, dumbass?
"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""" """"""""""""""
And, pray tell, what were those? And don't pretend you weren't
drooling and slavering while you looked. I am looking forward to your
list.
..

(OT) : The Canadian National Psychosis - American Envy !
 

"ve3..." wrote:

On May 17, 2:16 pm, dxAce wrote:
"ve3duh..." wrote:

Since DxEcch slavers and drools when he reads my posts, looking for anything he can make a big deal of, I deliberately inserted a factual
error in the last ten days.


What about all the ones that were not deliberate, dumbass?
"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""" """"""""""""""
And, pray tell, what were those? And don't pretend you weren't
drooling and slavering while you looked.

Drooling and slavering? Another Canucky trait?

I am looking forward to your
list.

Have fun waiting, 'tard boy.

(OT) : The Canadian National Psychosis - American Envy !
 

No opinions =========== (equals)???????

I have billions of opinions.
cuhulin

(OT) : The Canadian National Psychosis - American Envy !
 

I read that what's his name,that Brit dude might go to
Afghanistan,instead of Iraq.(Afghanistan is safer for Brits because of
our U.S.Soldiers over there)
Winston Churchill insisted on being in harms way,and oftentimes he was
in harms way too.Things sure have changed since World War Two.
cuhulin,with billions of trillions of opinions

(OT) : The Canadian National Psychosis - American Envy !
 

On May 17, 4:10 pm, wrote:
No opinions =========== (equals)???????

I have billions of opinions.
cuhulin
"''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''' ''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''
You have to realize that when I am posting a "return fire" fact, it
should be free of bias so that I can not be accused of meddling in US
affairs. Of course I have opinions but the facts posted are pure
facts. With all the political hoo-ha that's going on that's not easy
to do.
My earlier post about the mother of all insults had a purpose. You
have enough Celt in you to know that you should not tempt fate.

(OT) : The Canadian National Psychosis - American Envy !
 

On May 17, 4:15 pm, wrote:
I read that what's his name,that Brit dude might go to
Afghanistan,instead of Iraq.(Afghanistan is safer for Brits because of
our U.S.Soldiers over there)
Winston Churchill insisted on being in harms way,and oftentimes he was
in harms way too.Things sure have changed since World War Two.
cuhulin,with billions of trillions of opinions

"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""" """""""""""
Winston Churchill had several doubles. He used to send them in harm's
way while he was safe on the estate. Things are not always what they
seem. Many of his speeches were read by sound-alikes.

(OT) : The Canadian National Psychosis - American Envy !
 

On May 17, 3:44 am, RHF wrote:
On May 16, 4:19 pm, "Brian O" wrote:





snipped the irrelevant and immature refuse...

VE3 insult return fact to DxEcch May 16 2007

Fact #2

"I would argue that the most serious threat to the United States is
not someone hiding in a cave in Afghanistan But our own fiscal
irresposibility."
David Walker, comptroller General of the Unied States...March 2007

If we weren't chasing them around those caves in Afghanistan, they would be
chasing you around your neighborhood. Hope you got your AK 47 locked and
loaded mr canadian. You really need to get your head out of the sand and
realize these guys are gonna kill you just because you're over here. They
don't care who you are. You should be GRATEFUL that OUR troops are in
Afghanistan keeping them in those caves.
B

Brian O - Canada has Troops in Afghanistan Too.

However the Caliphate {Islamic Rule} of Canadahttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Caliphate
is coming soon to America's Northern Neighbor.

Sharia {Islamic} Law is now being practiced in Canadahttp://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/4215182.stmhttp://www.youmeworks.com/sharia_canada.htmlhttp://www.nosharia.com/

it would seem that canada has rolled-over
and is ready to submit to islamic rule ~ RHF
.
.
. .- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text
"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""
Another botched post from RHF.
You used old references from may 2004 and sep 2005.
All you had to do was look up"Sharia Law" on this website and you
would find
my post of sept 12, 2005 reporting that the courts of quebec and
ontario had
ruled against the use of Sharis law. Go look it up...it has links and
everything.
The next time you let your hatred of Canada get you fired up, take a
deep
breath and go check your facts.

(OT) : The Canadian National Psychosis - American Envy !
 

Have you ever read The War Magician book? (see if you can find the
book,read it,dig the pictures/photos) I have the soft back pocket book
right here,I read it back in the 1970's.Winston Churchill, (his mom was
an Ameican,ya know) the real Winston Churchill,really did put himself in
harms way,on purpose,a bunch of times in World War Two.I have other
books here about World War Two.World War Two is,and always has been,my
favorite subject ever since I was a boy.Next favorites,Classic and
Antique cars and trucks and motorcycles and old timey jalopy dirt track
dare devil racing and rodeos and horse racing and greyhound dog racing.
cuhulin

(OT) : The Canadian National Psychosis - American Envy !
 

On May 17, 3:32 pm, wrote:
Have you ever read The War Magician book? (see if you can find the
book,read it,dig the pictures/photos) I have the soft back pocket book
right here,I read it back in the 1970's.Winston Churchill, (his mom was
an Ameican,ya know) the real Winston Churchill,really did put himself in
harms way,on purpose,a bunch of times in World War Two.I have other
books here about World War Two.World War Two is,and always has been,my
favorite subject ever since I was a boy.Next favorites,Classic and
Antique cars and trucks and motorcycles and old timey jalopy dirt track
dare devil racing and rodeos and horse racing and greyhound dog racing.
cuhulin

You're right that he put himself in harm's way cuhulin. He also
fought during the Second Boer War and at the Battle of Omdurman. But I
think that ve3 is also right about him having at least one, and maybe
two doubles during WW II. That what a lot of people say. But I don't
know it for a fact.
So I think, as far as I know, that you are both correct.
Churchill was a very unique person, I think we all agree
about that. I admired him greatly while growing up. I also admired
John F. Kennedy when I was a young kid. But I don't have any
admiration for his brother, Edward "Ted" Kennedy.
I also liked Margaret Thatcher, and Ronald Reagan.
I guess I can sit back now, and watch the slings and arrows
headed my way. ;-)
Cato

Cato

(OT) : The Canadian National Psychosis - American Envy !
 

What do you think about what those cats over there at
soc.history.war.world-war-ii newsgroup are saying about Winston
Churchill as regards Australia?

You also might want to do a www.devilfinder.com for, rense.com
Winston Churchill
(everything at www.rense.com isn't kook stuff)
I have known for many years Winston Churchill had stand in doubles.I
used to subscribe to snail mail True and Saga and Bluebook For Men
magazines before they went belly up.Sometimes there were some articles
in those magazines about World War Two.
cuhulin

(OT) : The Canadian National Psychosis - American Envy !
 

"Cato" wrote in message
oups.com...
On May 17, 3:32 pm, wrote:
Have you ever read The War Magician book? (see if you can find the
book,read it,dig the pictures/photos) I have the soft back pocket book
right here,I read it back in the 1970's.Winston Churchill, (his mom was
an Ameican,ya know) the real Winston Churchill,really did put himself in
harms way,on purpose,a bunch of times in World War Two.I have other
books here about World War Two.World War Two is,and always has been,my
favorite subject ever since I was a boy.Next favorites,Classic and
Antique cars and trucks and motorcycles and old timey jalopy dirt track
dare devil racing and rodeos and horse racing and greyhound dog racing.
cuhulin

You're right that he put himself in harm's way cuhulin. He also
fought during the Second Boer War and at the Battle of Omdurman. But I
think that ve3 is also right about him having at least one, and maybe
two doubles during WW II. That what a lot of people say. But I don't
know it for a fact.
So I think, as far as I know, that you are both correct.
Churchill was a very unique person, I think we all agree
about that. I admired him greatly while growing up. I also admired
John F. Kennedy when I was a young kid. But I don't have any
admiration for his brother, Edward "Ted" Kennedy.
I also liked Margaret Thatcher, and Ronald Reagan.
I guess I can sit back now, and watch the slings and arrows
headed my way. ;-)
Cato

Cato

I gloat over that marvelous quotation attributed to
Sir Winston Churchill : "The greatness of a man
" is measured by the venom of his enemies".
Think of that when the "slings and arrows"
show up on your radar !! miki.

(OT) : The Canadian National Psychosis - American Envy !
 

You mentioned the book "The War Magician" in relation to Winston Churchill.
The only reference i could find to this book was a "Major Jasper Maskelyne"
who used his techniques of magic/illusion to defeat the nazis. Nothing was
mentioned concerning Winston Churchill.

"Cato" wrote in message
oups.com...
On May 17, 3:32 pm, wrote:
Have you ever read The War Magician book? (see if you can find the
book,read it,dig the pictures/photos) I have the soft back pocket book
right here,I read it back in the 1970's.Winston Churchill, (his mom was
an Ameican,ya know) the real Winston Churchill,really did put himself in
harms way,on purpose,a bunch of times in World War Two.I have other
books here about World War Two.World War Two is,and always has been,my
favorite subject ever since I was a boy.Next favorites,Classic and
Antique cars and trucks and motorcycles and old timey jalopy dirt track
dare devil racing and rodeos and horse racing and greyhound dog racing.
cuhulin

You're right that he put himself in harm's way cuhulin. He also
fought during the Second Boer War and at the Battle of Omdurman. But I
think that ve3 is also right about him having at least one, and maybe
two doubles during WW II. That what a lot of people say. But I don't
know it for a fact.
So I think, as far as I know, that you are both correct.
Churchill was a very unique person, I think we all agree
about that. I admired him greatly while growing up. I also admired
John F. Kennedy when I was a young kid. But I don't have any
admiration for his brother, Edward "Ted" Kennedy.
I also liked Margaret Thatcher, and Ronald Reagan.
I guess I can sit back now, and watch the slings and arrows
headed my way. ;-)
Cato

Cato

(OT) : The Canadian National Psychosis - American Envy !
 

If the photo isn't in that book,it is in another book I have here.A
photo of a British Ship off the coast of France and Winston Churchill is
inspecting some Gun emplacements on shore.There is enemy fire coming in
and he was asked to get back inside the bunker where it is safer,but he
didn't get back inside.

I am not neat and tidy and orderly.My books and stuff are scattered all
over the place in my dusty old house.It would take me more time than I
care to spend looking for that photo.Ever since I got internet access
and DirecTV, I stay glued to the couch.

The Real Churchill - Mises Institute
www.mises.org/story/1450
cuhulin

(OT) : The Canadian National Psychosis - American Envy !
 

On May 18, 9:30 am, wrote:
If the photo isn't in that book,it is in another book I have here.A
photo of a British Ship off the coast of France and Winston Churchill is
inspecting some Gun emplacements on shore.There is enemy fire coming in
and he was asked to get back inside the bunker where it is safer,but he
didn't get back inside.

I am not neat and tidy and orderly.My books and stuff are scattered all
over the place in my dusty old house.It would take me more time than I
care to spend looking for that photo.Ever since I got internet access
and DirecTV, I stay glued to the couch.

The Real Churchill - Mises Institutewww.mises.org/story/1450
cuhulin

Something else interesting about Churchill is that the United States
made him an Honorary Citizen of the United States of America.
Cuhulin, I have read some of Von Mises works. I
believe that he was a great friend of freedom.
Best regards,
Cato

Citizen of the United States of America



Declaration of Citizenship
Response by President John F. Kennedy
and the Response by Winston Churchill

Declaration of Honorary Citizen
of United States of America
April 9, 1963



BY THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
A PROCLAMATION

WHEREAS Sir Winston Churchill, a son of America though a subject of
Britain, has been throughout his life a firm and steadfast friend of
the American people and the American nation; and

WHEREAS he has freely offered his hand and his faith in days of
adversity as well as triumph; and

WHEREAS his bravery, charity and valor, both in war and in peace, have
been a flame of inspiration in freedom's darkest hour; and

WHEREAS his life has shown that no adversary can overcome, and no feat
can deter, free men in the defense of their freedom; and

WHEREAS he has by his art as an historian and his judgment as a
statesman made the past the servant of the future;

NOW, THEREFORE, I, JOHN F. KENNEDY, President of the United States of
America, under the authority contained in an Act of the 88th Congress,
do hereby declare Sir Winston Churchill an honorary citizen of the
United States of America.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and caused the Seal of
the United States of America to be affixed.

DONE at the City of Washington this ninth day of April, in the year of
our Lord nineteen hundred and sixty-three, and of the Independence of
the United States of America the one hundred and eighty-seventh.

JOHN FITZGERALD KENNEDY



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Remarks by President John F. Kennedy at
the White House, Washington D.C., April 9, 1963

We meet to honor a man whose honor requires no meeting -- for he is
the most honored and honorable man to walk the stage of human history
in the time in which we live.

Whenever and wherever tyranny threatened, he has always championed
liberty.

Facing firmly toward the future, he has never forgotten the past.

Serving six monarchs of his native Great Britain, he has served all
men's freedom and dignity.

In the dark days and darker nights when Britain stood alone -- and
most men save Englishmen despaired of England's life -- he mobilized
the English language and sent it into battle. The incandescent quality
of his words illuminated the courage of his countrymen.

Given unlimited powers by his citizens, he was ever vigilant to
protect their rights.

Indifferent himself to danger, he wept over the sorrows of others.

A child of the House of Commons, he became in time its father.

Accustomed to the hardships of battle, he has no distaste for
pleasure.

Now his stately Ship of Life, having weathered the severest storms of
a troubled century, is anchored in tranquil waters, proof that courage
and faith and the zest for freedom are truly indestructible. The
record of his triumphant passage will inspire free hearts for all
time.

By adding his name to our rolls, we mean to honor him -- but his
acceptance honors us far more. For no statement or proclamation can
enrich his name -- the name Sir Winston Churchill is already legend.



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Sir Winston's response
28 Hyde Park Gate, London, April 6, 1963
As read at the White House
by Randolph S. Churchill, April 9, 1963

Mr. President,

I have been informed by Mr. David Bruce that it is your intention to
sign a Bill conferring upon me Honorary Citizenship of the United
States.

I have received many kindnesses from the United States of America, but
the honour which you now accord me is without parallel. I accept it
with deep gratitude and affection.

I am also most sensible of the warm-hearted action of the individual
States who accorded me the great compliment of their own honorary
citizenships as a prelude to this Act of Congress.

It is a remarkable comment on our affairs that the former Prime
Minister of a great sovereign state should thus be received as an
honorary citizen of another. I say "great sovereign state" with design
and emphasis, for I reject the view that Britain and the Commonwealth
should now be relegated to a tame and minor role in the world. Our
past is the key to our future, which I firmly trust and believe will
be no less fertile and glorious. Let no man underrate our energies,
our potentialities and our abiding power for good.

I am, as you know, half American by blood, and the story of my
association with that mighty and benevolent nation goes back nearly
ninety years to the day of my Father's marriage. In this century of
storm and tragedy I contemplate with high satisfaction the constant
factor of the interwoven and upward progress of our peoples. Our
comradeship and our brotherhood in war were unexampled. We stood
together, and because of that fact the free world now stands. Nor has
our partnership any exclusive natu the Atlantic community is a
dream that can well be fulfilled to the detriment of none and to the
enduring benefit and honour of the great democracies.

Mr. President, your action illuminates the theme of unity of the
English-speaking peoples, to which I have devoted a large part of my
life. I would ask you to accept yourself, and to convey to both Houses
of Congress, and through them to the American people, my solemn and
heartfelt thanks for this unique distinction, which will always be
proudly remembered by my descendants.

WINSTON S. CHURCHILL

(OT) : The Canadian National Psychosis - American Envy !
 

Cato wrote:

On May 18, 9:30 am, wrote:
If the photo isn't in that book,it is in another book I have here.A
photo of a British Ship off the coast of France and Winston Churchill is
inspecting some Gun emplacements on shore.There is enemy fire coming in
and he was asked to get back inside the bunker where it is safer,but he
didn't get back inside.

I am not neat and tidy and orderly.My books and stuff are scattered all
over the place in my dusty old house.It would take me more time than I
care to spend looking for that photo.Ever since I got internet access
and DirecTV, I stay glued to the couch.

The Real Churchill - Mises Institutewww.mises.org/story/1450
cuhulin

Something else interesting about Churchill is that the United States
made him an Honorary Citizen of the United States of America.
Cuhulin, I have read some of Von Mises works. I
believe that he was a great friend of freedom.
Best regards,
Cato

Citizen of the United States of America

Declaration of Citizenship
Response by President John F. Kennedy
and the Response by Winston Churchill

Declaration of Honorary Citizen
of United States of America
April 9, 1963

BY THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
A PROCLAMATION

WHEREAS Sir Winston Churchill, a son of America though a subject of
Britain, has been throughout his life a firm and steadfast friend of
the American people and the American nation; and

WHEREAS he has freely offered his hand and his faith in days of
adversity as well as triumph; and

WHEREAS his bravery, charity and valor, both in war and in peace, have
been a flame of inspiration in freedom's darkest hour; and

WHEREAS his life has shown that no adversary can overcome, and no feat
can deter, free men in the defense of their freedom; and

WHEREAS he has by his art as an historian and his judgment as a
statesman made the past the servant of the future;

NOW, THEREFORE, I, JOHN F. KENNEDY, President of the United States of
America, under the authority contained in an Act of the 88th Congress,
do hereby declare Sir Winston Churchill an honorary citizen of the
United States of America.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and caused the Seal of
the United States of America to be affixed.

DONE at the City of Washington this ninth day of April, in the year of
our Lord nineteen hundred and sixty-three, and of the Independence of
the United States of America the one hundred and eighty-seventh.

JOHN FITZGERALD KENNEDY

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Remarks by President John F. Kennedy at
the White House, Washington D.C., April 9, 1963

We meet to honor a man whose honor requires no meeting -- for he is
the most honored and honorable man to walk the stage of human history
in the time in which we live.

Whenever and wherever tyranny threatened, he has always championed
liberty.

Facing firmly toward the future, he has never forgotten the past.

Serving six monarchs of his native Great Britain, he has served all
men's freedom and dignity.

In the dark days and darker nights when Britain stood alone -- and
most men save Englishmen despaired of England's life -- he mobilized
the English language and sent it into battle. The incandescent quality
of his words illuminated the courage of his countrymen.

Given unlimited powers by his citizens, he was ever vigilant to
protect their rights.

Indifferent himself to danger, he wept over the sorrows of others.

A child of the House of Commons, he became in time its father.

Accustomed to the hardships of battle, he has no distaste for
pleasure.

Now his stately Ship of Life, having weathered the severest storms of
a troubled century, is anchored in tranquil waters, proof that courage
and faith and the zest for freedom are truly indestructible. The
record of his triumphant passage will inspire free hearts for all
time.

By adding his name to our rolls, we mean to honor him -- but his
acceptance honors us far more. For no statement or proclamation can
enrich his name -- the name Sir Winston Churchill is already legend.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Sir Winston's response
28 Hyde Park Gate, London, April 6, 1963
As read at the White House
by Randolph S. Churchill, April 9, 1963

Mr. President,

I have been informed by Mr. David Bruce that it is your intention to
sign a Bill conferring upon me Honorary Citizenship of the United
States.

I have received many kindnesses from the United States of America, but
the honour which you now accord me is without parallel. I accept it
with deep gratitude and affection.

I am also most sensible of the warm-hearted action of the individual
States who accorded me the great compliment of their own honorary
citizenships as a prelude to this Act of Congress.

It is a remarkable comment on our affairs that the former Prime
Minister of a great sovereign state should thus be received as an
honorary citizen of another. I say "great sovereign state" with design
and emphasis, for I reject the view that Britain and the Commonwealth
should now be relegated to a tame and minor role in the world. Our
past is the key to our future, which I firmly trust and believe will
be no less fertile and glorious. Let no man underrate our energies,
our potentialities and our abiding power for good.

I am, as you know, half American by blood, and the story of my
association with that mighty and benevolent nation goes back nearly
ninety years to the day of my Father's marriage. In this century of
storm and tragedy I contemplate with high satisfaction the constant
factor of the interwoven and upward progress of our peoples. Our
comradeship and our brotherhood in war were unexampled. We stood
together, and because of that fact the free world now stands. Nor has
our partnership any exclusive natu the Atlantic community is a
dream that can well be fulfilled to the detriment of none and to the
enduring benefit and honour of the great democracies.

Mr. President, your action illuminates the theme of unity of the
English-speaking peoples, to which I have devoted a large part of my
life. I would ask you to accept yourself, and to convey to both Houses
of Congress, and through them to the American people, my solemn and
heartfelt thanks for this unique distinction, which will always be
proudly remembered by my descendants.

WINSTON S. CHURCHILL

And by golly, he wasn't a dumbass Canuck, as the Canuck is no match for the likes of
Sir Winston.

(OT) : The Canadian National Psychosis - American Envy !
 

If you want to www.devilfinder.com it,there was an auction of some
Winston Churchill lost photos, devilfinder.com Winston Churchill
Photo Archives
cuhulin