I've had both. It's not even close to the Sony 2010!


"David" wrote in message
...
On 28 May 2007 15:31:52 -0700, wrote:

Nearly new condition, in original box.

http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll...m=190117476400

Good deal. Comparable to the ICF-2010.

On Tue, 29 May 2007 01:43:26 GMT, "Frank"
wrote:

I've had both. It's not even close to the Sony 2010!


"David" wrote in message
.. .
On 28 May 2007 15:31:52 -0700, wrote:

Nearly new condition, in original box.

http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll...m=190117476400

Good deal. Comparable to the ICF-2010.

You're right, it's better.

Care to explain? In my opinion, the Sony 2010 tunes SSB signals MUCH easier,
like a tabletop. The DX-440/Sangean ATS-803A is really frustrating to
bandscan with.

Frank

"David" wrote in message
...
On Tue, 29 May 2007 01:43:26 GMT, "Frank"
wrote:

I've had both. It's not even close to the Sony 2010!


"David" wrote in message
. ..
On 28 May 2007 15:31:52 -0700, wrote:

Nearly new condition, in original box.

http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll...m=190117476400

Good deal. Comparable to the ICF-2010.

You're right, it's better.

On Wed, 30 May 2007 22:01:41 GMT, "Frank"
wrote:

Care to explain? In my opinion, the Sony 2010 tunes SSB signals MUCH easier,
like a tabletop. The DX-440/Sangean ATS-803A is really frustrating to
bandscan with.

The Sangean is much more rugged, has better audio, and feels more like
a radio.

The front display panels on them Sangean radios are real good at going
out.
cuhulin