Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jun 27, 6:20 am, David wrote:
On Tue, 26 Jun 2007 07:07:13 -0700, bpnjensen wrote: On Jun 25, 3:19 pm, "Brian Hill" wrote: "bpnjensen" wrote in message And, black holes do not exist.I never have believed they exist.It's all phoney Baloney. Gee, that's harsh - ol' Albert Einstein has been right, so far, about everything else in his Theory... Black holes are no longer theory but fact. BH Now this I have not heard. Can you provide a citation? Since they cannot be observed directly, and are (at their closest) many tens or hundreds of light years away, how can this be stated with certainty? I realize that certain phenomena cannot be explained without them, but that does not make them factual as of yet... Bruce Jensen http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sagittarius_A%2A- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Thanks for this - but it is still just *evidence*, and not proof positive of the actual fact: "This is compatible with, and strong evidence in support of, the hypothesis that Sagittarius A* is a supermassive black hole." Most scientists will believe it - as do I - but none worth their salt would claim it is 100% indisputable. Until you see one up close *and* obtain verifying information from it - and the way black holes are apparently made, this may be technically impossible - that magic 100% may never be reached. Bruce Jensen |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
NOMINATION: Thick As A Brick the same old theist argument from ignorance | Policy | |||
Sporadic-E Layer effect intensified by lightning | Dx | |||
"D" Layer in the Ionosphere | Shortwave | |||
FA: Southwest Technical Products Digital Capacitance Meter | Swap |