Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
(OT) Thick Layer Of Magma Found Under American Southwest.
www.standeyo.com
And, black holes do not exist.I never have believed they exist.It's all phoney Baloney. Paris Hilton gets extra Baloney and an extra carton of Apple Juice and an extra blanket in the klink.Paris Hilton said she hates orange. cuhulin |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
(OT) Thick Layer Of Magma Found Under American Southwest.
I would not be surprised to find a think layer of magma under the earth at most locations! |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
(OT) Thick Layer Of Magma Found Under American Southwest.
On Jun 25, 10:38 am, wrote:
www.standeyo.com Like Roadie, not too surprised about the magma. And, black holes do not exist.I never have believed they exist.It's all phoney Baloney. Gee, that's harsh - ol' Albert Einstein has been right, so far, about everything else in his Theory... :-) Paris Hilton gets extra Baloney and an extra carton of Apple Juice and an extra blanket in the klink.Paris Hilton said she hates orange. cuhulin She is *truly* screwed up. And boring as hell, to boot. Bruce Jensen |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
(OT) Thick Layer Of Magma Found Under American Southwest.
"bpnjensen" wrote in message And, black holes do not exist.I never have believed they exist.It's all phoney Baloney. Gee, that's harsh - ol' Albert Einstein has been right, so far, about everything else in his Theory... Black holes are no longer theory but fact. BH |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
(OT) Thick Layer Of Magma Found Under American Southwest.
On Jun 25, 3:19 pm, "Brian Hill" wrote:
"bpnjensen" wrote in message And, black holes do not exist.I never have believed they exist.It's all phoney Baloney. Gee, that's harsh - ol' Albert Einstein has been right, so far, about everything else in his Theory... Black holes are no longer theory but fact. BH Now this I have not heard. Can you provide a citation? Since they cannot be observed directly, and are (at their closest) many tens or hundreds of light years away, how can this be stated with certainty? I realize that certain phenomena cannot be explained without them, but that does not make them factual as of yet... Bruce Jensen |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
(OT) Thick Layer Of Magma Found Under American Southwest.
On Tue, 26 Jun 2007 07:07:13 -0700, bpnjensen
wrote: On Jun 25, 3:19 pm, "Brian Hill" wrote: "bpnjensen" wrote in message And, black holes do not exist.I never have believed they exist.It's all phoney Baloney. Gee, that's harsh - ol' Albert Einstein has been right, so far, about everything else in his Theory... Black holes are no longer theory but fact. BH Now this I have not heard. Can you provide a citation? Since they cannot be observed directly, and are (at their closest) many tens or hundreds of light years away, how can this be stated with certainty? I realize that certain phenomena cannot be explained without them, but that does not make them factual as of yet... Bruce Jensen http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sagittarius_A%2A |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
(OT) Thick Layer Of Magma Found Under American Southwest.
On Jun 27, 6:20 am, David wrote:
On Tue, 26 Jun 2007 07:07:13 -0700, bpnjensen wrote: On Jun 25, 3:19 pm, "Brian Hill" wrote: "bpnjensen" wrote in message And, black holes do not exist.I never have believed they exist.It's all phoney Baloney. Gee, that's harsh - ol' Albert Einstein has been right, so far, about everything else in his Theory... Black holes are no longer theory but fact. BH Now this I have not heard. Can you provide a citation? Since they cannot be observed directly, and are (at their closest) many tens or hundreds of light years away, how can this be stated with certainty? I realize that certain phenomena cannot be explained without them, but that does not make them factual as of yet... Bruce Jensen http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sagittarius_A%2A- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Thanks for this - but it is still just *evidence*, and not proof positive of the actual fact: "This is compatible with, and strong evidence in support of, the hypothesis that Sagittarius A* is a supermassive black hole." Most scientists will believe it - as do I - but none worth their salt would claim it is 100% indisputable. Until you see one up close *and* obtain verifying information from it - and the way black holes are apparently made, this may be technically impossible - that magic 100% may never be reached. Bruce Jensen |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
(OT) Black holes do not exist
"Christy D" wrote in message ... On Tue, 26 Jun 2007 07:07:13 -0700, bpnjensen wrote: On Jun 25, 3:19 pm, "Brian Hill" wrote: "bpnjensen" wrote in message And, black holes do not exist.I never have believed they exist.It's all phoney Baloney. Gee, that's harsh - ol' Albert Einstein has been right, so far, about everything else in his Theory... Black holes are no longer theory but fact. BH Now this I have not heard. Can you provide a citation? Since they cannot be observed directly, and are (at their closest) many tens or hundreds of light years away, how can this be stated with certainty? I realize that certain phenomena cannot be explained without them, but that does not make them factual as of yet... Einstein didn't believe in black holes himself and was always troubled by the concept. Recently, Nature published an article about George Chapline, a physicst at LLL, who thinks that a black hole is in reality a "dark energy" star. The Nature article is available on the web at http://www.nature.com/news/2005/0503...0328-8_pf.html The existence of black holes is therefore far from being an established fact I guess we can argue about symantics but they do exist. Our interpretation may change over time. BH |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
(OT) Black holes do not exist
On Jun 26, 7:57 am, "Brian Hill" wrote:
"Christy D" wrote in message ... On Tue, 26 Jun 2007 07:07:13 -0700, bpnjensen wrote: On Jun 25, 3:19 pm, "Brian Hill" wrote: "bpnjensen" wrote in message And, black holes do not exist.I never have believed they exist.It's all phoney Baloney. Gee, that's harsh - ol' Albert Einstein has been right, so far, about everything else in his Theory... Black holes are no longer theory but fact. BH Now this I have not heard. Can you provide a citation? Since they cannot be observed directly, and are (at their closest) many tens or hundreds of light years away, how can this be stated with certainty? I realize that certain phenomena cannot be explained without them, but that does not make them factual as of yet... Einstein didn't believe in black holes himself and was always troubled by the concept. Recently, Nature published an article about George Chapline, a physicst at LLL, who thinks that a black hole is in reality a "dark energy" star. The Nature article is available on the web at http://www.nature.com/news/2005/0503...0328-8_pf.html The existence of black holes is therefore far from being an established fact I guess we can argue about symantics but they do exist. Our interpretation may change over time. BH- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Did you read the article Christy D posted? |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
(OT) Black holes do not exist
Brian Hill wrote:
I guess we can argue about symantics but they do exist. Our interpretation may change over time. I never would have figured you for being anti semantic. mike |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
NOMINATION: Thick As A Brick the same old theist argument from ignorance | Policy | |||
Sporadic-E Layer effect intensified by lightning | Dx | |||
"D" Layer in the Ionosphere | Shortwave | |||
FA: Southwest Technical Products Digital Capacitance Meter | Swap |