Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#25
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hein ten Horn wrote:
Hmm, let's examine this. From the two composing oscillations you get the overall displacement: y(t) = sin(2 pi 220 t) + sin(2 pi 224 t) From the points of intersection of y(t) at the time-axes you can find the period of the function, so examine when y(t) = 0. sin(2 pi 220 t) + sin(2 pi 224 t) = 0 (..) (Assuming you can do the math.) (..) The solutions a t = k/(220+224) with k = 0, 1, 2, 3, etc. so the time between two successive intersections is Dt = 1/(220+224) s. With two intersections per period, the period is twice as large, thus T = 2/(220+224) s, hence the frequency is f = (220+224)/2 = 222 Hz, which is the arithmetic average of both composing frequencies. As I said before, it might be correct to say that the average, or effective frequency is 222 Hz. But the actual period varies from cycle to cycle over a period of 1/(224-220). the amplitude of which is easily plotted versus time using Mathematica, Mathcad, Sigma Plot, and even Excel. I think you should still give that a try. No peculiarities found. Perhaps you would agree that a change in period of less than 2% might be difficult to observe - especially when you're not expecting to see it. To more easily find the 'peculiarities' I suggest that you try using more widely spaced frequencies. gr, Hein gr right back at ya, jk |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|