Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
AM electromagnetic waves: 20 KHz modulation frequency on anastronomically-low carrier frequency
Michael A. Terrell wrote:
I only have one portable receiver, the RS DX-375, which is kept in my hurricane emergency kit. It was bought on price, alone... I had one and was quite disappointed by its image response (even in the absence of strong signal IMD, overloading, etc.). For example, WWV on 10 Mhz was equally strong on 9545 kHz. I never saw the schematic so I know nothing about its front end and evidently it is single conversion but one would have hoped for a varactor tuned preselector How is image rejection on yours? Cross-posts limited to sci.electronics.basics and rec.radio.shortwave Regards, Michael |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
AM electromagnetic waves: 20 KHz modulation frequency on an astronomically-low carrier frequency
msg ) writes:
Michael A. Terrell wrote: I only have one portable receiver, the RS DX-375, which is kept in my hurricane emergency kit. It was bought on price, alone... I had one and was quite disappointed by its image response (even in the absence of strong signal IMD, overloading, etc.). For example, WWV on 10 Mhz was equally strong on 9545 kHz. I never saw the schematic so I know nothing about its front end and evidently it is single conversion but one would have hoped for a varactor tuned preselector It's completely unlikely that it doesn't have a tuned front end. Because the whole notion of "tracking" came about when early on it was realized that images were a bad side effect of the superheterodyne receiver, and it they didn't set it up so the front end tuning wasn't tuned with the same knob as the oscillator, it would be too easy to mistune to the image. The bad image rejection is a reflection of the low cost. Any cheap receiver from forty years ago would likewise suffer bad image rejection. There really is no real difference between a front end tuned with a mechanical variable capacitor and a front end tuned with a varactor. IN order to be cheap, such reacievers would skimp in the design. So there'd be one or two tuned circuits before the mixer, and that wasn't enough the higher you went in frequency with a 455KHz IF to get rid of the images. On the other hand, a top end receiver like the HRO-60 was said to be pretty good at image rejection, even getting up there close to 30MHz. The difference was that it had more tuned circuits between the antenna and the mixer, so it was far better able to reject the image. Michael |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
AM electromagnetic waves: 20 KHz modulation frequency on anastronomically-low carrier frequency
msg wrote:
Michael A. Terrell wrote: I only have one portable receiver, the RS DX-375, which is kept in my hurricane emergency kit. It was bought on price, alone... I had one and was quite disappointed by its image response (even in the absence of strong signal IMD, overloading, etc.). For example, WWV on 10 Mhz was equally strong on 9545 kHz. I never saw the schematic so I know nothing about its front end and evidently it is single conversion but one would have hoped for a varactor tuned preselector How is image rejection on yours? Its acceptable for emergency, but not what I'd want for daily use. I have a 50 KW FM transmitter and multiple cell sites within a mile Right now I'm restoring a 1950's era national NC183R with a properly designed front end, with two tuned RF preamp stages. http://bama.edebris.com/download/nat...c183/nc183.pdf See page 16 for the front end circuitry. (855 KB (876,468 bytes)) I also have a HP 312B frequency selective voltmeter: http://bama.edebris.com/download/hp/312bd/hp312bd.pdf (106 MB download). -- Service to my country? Been there, Done that, and I've got my DD214 to prove it. Member of DAV #85. Michael A. Terrell Central Florida |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|