(OT) : Zeke - Present What The BBC Actually Said : Quote the
 

RHF wrote:


Your lack of factualality causes you to make False and misleading
points.

Huh? A DIRECT word-for-word quote from the front page of the Wall
Street Journal is a lack of factuality? And what was false and misleading?

a) Direct quote from WSJ said "unsafe as 9/10/2001"

b) I said wars went on for 6 years (Afghanistan+Iraq). True fact!

c) I said the total cost so far was about half a trillion. True Fact!

d) I then asked a legitimate question of why they felt we were "unsafe"
after all that time and money.

I'm sorry, but I don't know what can be more factual than that, nor do I
see what is "false or misleading" about any of the statements I made.
Please be SPECIFIC in which statement(s) of mine you believe are "false
or misleading".

Also, even though the WSJ was my *secondary* source, I hope you can now
see why I mentioned it; unless you have an actual recording of a radio
broadcast, it can be difficult to remember exactly what was said. If you
have a secondary source in *print* (from a conservative, right-wing
source no less), it can go a long way towards removing confusion (except
in your case, where it seems to be causing confusion).

- There were TWO stories on BBC. The FIRST story
- (that I heard and quoted) and then the SECOND story
- of Bush's denial that you quoted.

But the first was not a American Bashing Story
- - - Which is what you tried to turn it in to.

I didn't try and "turn it" into anything. Just a direct quote from a
conservative, right wing source, which in turn lead to a fair,
reasonable and perfectly justified question--namely, after all this time
and all this money, why are we still at 9/10/01? Again, a FAIR and
REASONABLE question. NO bashing intended, but if you insist on seeing it
that way, that's YOUR problem.

And I liked the second story better because it
Told the Truth : As I See It [.]

Well, gee, -personal- likes. So what? Just because you "like" something
is not germane to an intellectual discussion. I'm pretty sure you like
pizza more than you like Brussel sprouts, but so what?

* Do NOT promote Your Liberal Anti-American Political
Propaganda

Legitimately asking if our tax dollars were spent wisely is
"Anti-American"? Legitimately asking why we are no safer is propaganda?
I'm sorry, but you have that backwards: it's Pro-American!

- Think for a minute (I know it's hard, but try):
- there had to be something that came first
- (my quoted story) for there to be something
- for Bush to deny (your second story). Timing
- is everything. You simply missed the first
- BBC story.

I did 'think' {Oh It Hurts My Tiny Little Brain}
and caught you Propagandizing [.]
The fact that you are still trying to peddle these
Liberal Democrat Lies and Left-Wing Distortions
is simply more evidence that your agenda was
to Bash America and Blame the US President
George "W" Bush.

Please see all of my responses above. Not bashing, not a lie, no
distortions--except in your overheated "Tiny Little Brain".

And yes, W does get the credit--or the blame. "The buck stops here"
means the President's desk--for better or worse. What part of that
simple statement don't you understand? W is not perfect; he can and has
made mistakes, and like all of us, he is responsible for what he has
done, good or bad. And 70+% of the American public thinks he has done
bad. (Just to anticipate you, that was not bashing or propaganda, Just a
simple statement of fact from many polls as presented by many sources).

Fighting for Truth, Justice and the American Way !

Jeez, try not to get your cape caught in your zipper...and don't slam
the door on that telephone booth.

- OK, so again you think what came from the front
- page of the Wall Street Journal (my *secondary*
- source) is liberal and left wing. Your opinion,
- can't argue with that.

Zeke - You do not need a 2nd Source -if- You are Truthful
to begin with.

I'm sorry you *STILL* don't get it. Yes, I was truthful to begin with.
However, a radio newscast (and radio waves) are a very ephemeral thing.
Once the broadcast is over, it's gone. A second source is given as a
-courtesy- for those who wish to verify my statement but missed the
broadcast.

But your follow-on statements were not from the BBC
there were simply more LL&LWD . {Propaganda}

My follow up statements were true:

-the war has gone on for 6 years
-we have spent half a trillion dollars

And after those two facts, I asked a simple, logical and legitimate
question any reasonably intelligent person would be within their rights
to ask.

Whether I heard the BBC Broacast or not does not
mean that it did not exist : But your follow-on
statements which were not from the BBC there were
simply more LL&LWD . {Propaganda}

No, it was simply a logical and legitimate question any reasonably
intelligent person would be within their rights to ask.

Fact: We have been fighting the "Global War on Terrorism" for 6 years.

Fact: We have spent half a trillion to date.

Fact: The Beeb (and the right wing WSJ) reported we were in as much
danger as we were before the "War on Terrorism" started.

Now, it seems that any person with half a brain would be within their
rights to ask why this is so. Not bashing, not anti-American, not
propaganda--just a simple, fair, legitimate question.

Now please, don't be so rigid in your "party-line" thinking and don't be
such a nazi that you think people should not be able to question their
government without being accused of being "anti-American". If your "Tiny
Little Brain" gave it a just moment's thought, you would realize
questioning your government is PRO-American. That's how America came
into being--by "questioning" King George (the English one).

(OT) : Zeke - Present What The BBC Actually Said : Quote theNew
 

Zeke Zzzzpt wrote:

RHF wrote:

Your lack of factualality causes you to make False and misleading
points.

Huh? A DIRECT word-for-word quote from the front page of the Wall
Street Journal is a lack of factuality? And what was false and misleading?

a) Direct quote from WSJ said "unsafe as 9/10/2001"

b) I said wars went on for 6 years (Afghanistan+Iraq). True fact!

c) I said the total cost so far was about half a trillion. True Fact!

d) I then asked a legitimate question of why they felt we were "unsafe"
after all that time and money.

I'm sorry, but I don't know what can be more factual than that, nor do I
see what is "false or misleading" about any of the statements I made.
Please be SPECIFIC in which statement(s) of mine you believe are "false
or misleading".

Also, even though the WSJ was my *secondary* source, I hope you can now
see why I mentioned it; unless you have an actual recording of a radio
broadcast, it can be difficult to remember exactly what was said. If you
have a secondary source in *print* (from a conservative, right-wing
source no less), it can go a long way towards removing confusion (except
in your case, where it seems to be causing confusion).

- There were TWO stories on BBC. The FIRST story
- (that I heard and quoted) and then the SECOND story
- of Bush's denial that you quoted.

But the first was not a American Bashing Story
- - - Which is what you tried to turn it in to.

I didn't try and "turn it" into anything. Just a direct quote from a
conservative, right wing source, which in turn lead to a fair,
reasonable and perfectly justified question--namely, after all this time
and all this money, why are we still at 9/10/01? Again, a FAIR and
REASONABLE question. NO bashing intended, but if you insist on seeing it
that way, that's YOUR problem.

And I liked the second story better because it
Told the Truth : As I See It [.]

Well, gee, -personal- likes. So what? Just because you "like" something
is not germane to an intellectual discussion. I'm pretty sure you like
pizza more than you like Brussel sprouts, but so what?

* Do NOT promote Your Liberal Anti-American Political
Propaganda

Legitimately asking if our tax dollars were spent wisely is
"Anti-American"? Legitimately asking why we are no safer is propaganda?
I'm sorry, but you have that backwards: it's Pro-American!

- Think for a minute (I know it's hard, but try):
- there had to be something that came first
- (my quoted story) for there to be something
- for Bush to deny (your second story). Timing
- is everything. You simply missed the first
- BBC story.

I did 'think' {Oh It Hurts My Tiny Little Brain}
and caught you Propagandizing [.]
The fact that you are still trying to peddle these
Liberal Democrat Lies and Left-Wing Distortions
is simply more evidence that your agenda was
to Bash America and Blame the US President
George "W" Bush.

Please see all of my responses above. Not bashing, not a lie, no
distortions--except in your overheated "Tiny Little Brain".

And yes, W does get the credit--or the blame. "The buck stops here"
means the President's desk--for better or worse. What part of that
simple statement don't you understand? W is not perfect; he can and has
made mistakes, and like all of us, he is responsible for what he has
done, good or bad. And 70+% of the American public thinks he has done
bad. (Just to anticipate you, that was not bashing or propaganda, Just a
simple statement of fact from many polls as presented by many sources).

Fighting for Truth, Justice and the American Way !

Jeez, try not to get your cape caught in your zipper...and don't slam
the door on that telephone booth.

- OK, so again you think what came from the front
- page of the Wall Street Journal (my *secondary*
- source) is liberal and left wing. Your opinion,
- can't argue with that.

Zeke - You do not need a 2nd Source -if- You are Truthful
to begin with.

I'm sorry you *STILL* don't get it. Yes, I was truthful to begin with.
However, a radio newscast (and radio waves) are a very ephemeral thing.
Once the broadcast is over, it's gone. A second source is given as a
-courtesy- for those who wish to verify my statement but missed the
broadcast.

But your follow-on statements were not from the BBC
there were simply more LL&LWD . {Propaganda}

My follow up statements were true:

-the war has gone on for 6 years
-we have spent half a trillion dollars

And after those two facts, I asked a simple, logical and legitimate
question any reasonably intelligent person would be within their rights
to ask.

Whether I heard the BBC Broacast or not does not
mean that it did not exist : But your follow-on
statements which were not from the BBC there were
simply more LL&LWD . {Propaganda}

No, it was simply a logical and legitimate question any reasonably
intelligent person would be within their rights to ask.

Fact: We have been fighting the "Global War on Terrorism" for 6 years.

Fact: We have spent half a trillion to date.

Fact: The Beeb (and the right wing WSJ) reported we were in as much
danger as we were before the "War on Terrorism" started.

Now, it seems that any person with half a brain would be within their
rights to ask why this is so. Not bashing, not anti-American, not
propaganda--just a simple, fair, legitimate question.

Now please, don't be so rigid in your "party-line" thinking and don't be
such a nazi that you think people should not be able to question their
government without being accused of being "anti-American". If your "Tiny
Little Brain" gave it a just moment's thought, you would realize
questioning your government is PRO-American. That's how America came
into being--by "questioning" King George (the English one).

(OT) : Zeke - Present What The BBC Actually Said : Quote theNew
 

Zeke Zzzzpt wrote:

RHF wrote:

Your lack of factualality causes you to make False and misleading
points.

Huh? A DIRECT word-for-word quote from the front page of the Wall
Street Journal is a lack of factuality? And what was false and misleading?

a) Direct quote from WSJ said "unsafe as 9/10/2001"

b) I said wars went on for 6 years (Afghanistan+Iraq). True fact!

c) I said the total cost so far was about half a trillion. True Fact!

d) I then asked a legitimate question of why they felt we were "unsafe"
after all that time and money.

I'm sorry, but I don't know what can be more factual than that, nor do I
see what is "false or misleading" about any of the statements I made.
Please be SPECIFIC in which statement(s) of mine you believe are "false
or misleading".

Also, even though the WSJ was my *secondary* source, I hope you can now
see why I mentioned it; unless you have an actual recording of a radio
broadcast, it can be difficult to remember exactly what was said. If you
have a secondary source in *print* (from a conservative, right-wing
source no less), it can go a long way towards removing confusion (except
in your case, where it seems to be causing confusion).

- There were TWO stories on BBC. The FIRST story
- (that I heard and quoted) and then the SECOND story
- of Bush's denial that you quoted.

But the first was not a American Bashing Story
- - - Which is what you tried to turn it in to.

I didn't try and "turn it" into anything. Just a direct quote from a
conservative, right wing source, which in turn lead to a fair,
reasonable and perfectly justified question--namely, after all this time
and all this money, why are we still at 9/10/01?

Much better to be 9/10/01 than at 9/11/01 any way one slices, dices, spindles
and/or mutilates it.

Think about it.

dxAce
Michigan
USA

Stunning news heard on BBC!!!
 

On Thu, 12 Jul 2007 15:01:57 GMT, Zeke Zzzzpt
wrote:

Stunning news heard on the Beeb today, July 12...

"A U.S. threat assessment finds al Qaeda has rebuilt its capability to
mount attacks to a pre September 11 level".

Now, hold on a minute, folks...

--Hundreds of billions spent on "Homeland Security".

--Hundreds of billions spent on the "War on Global Terrorism" in
Afghanistan and Iraq for the last SIX YEARS.

--Tens of thousands of lives lost on both sides.

... and after -all that-, we are back at Square One???

Truly, we can say "Heckuva job, George"!


Did it ever occur to you liberal mouth-breathing morons that Al Qaida
would be EVEN STRONGER right now if President Bush hadn't gotten in
their face and started killing them in Afghanistan and Iraq?

No, of course not. That would be too logical for a Marxist "useful
idiot" like you.

I suppose it's somewhat comforting to know that you liberal
fudgepackers will be the first ones beheaded by the Muslims.

----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----

Stunning news heard on BBC!!!
 

On Jul 15, 12:31 pm, Me wrote:
On Thu, 12 Jul 2007 15:01:57 GMT, Zeke Zzzzpt
wrote:





Stunning news heard on the Beeb today, July 12...

"A U.S. threat assessment finds al Qaeda has rebuilt its capability to
mount attacks to a pre September 11 level".

Now, hold on a minute, folks...

--Hundreds of billions spent on "Homeland Security".

--Hundreds of billions spent on the "War on Global Terrorism" in
Afghanistan and Iraq for the last SIX YEARS.

--Tens of thousands of lives lost on both sides.

... and after -all that-, we are back at Square One???

Truly, we can say "Heckuva job, George"!

Did it ever occur to you liberal mouth-breathing morons that Al Qaida
would be EVEN STRONGER right now if President Bush hadn't gotten in
their face and started killing them in Afghanistan and Iraq?

No, of course not. That would be too logical for a Marxist "useful
idiot" like you.

I suppose it's somewhat comforting to know that you liberal
fudgepackers will be the first ones beheaded by the Muslims.

----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet News==----http://www.newsfeeds.comThe #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

"Me" - For the Liberals in Quest of Political Power :
It's about Bush Bashing and Blaming Bush
- - - the truth and reality be damned ~ RHF

(OT) : Caution - Be 'nice' To Zeke -or- He Might Call You A "Nazi"
 

On Jul 15, 7:21 am, Zeke Zzzzpt wrote:
RHF wrote:
Your lack of factualality causes you to make False and misleading
points.

Huh? A DIRECT word-for-word quote from the front page of the Wall
Street Journal is a lack of factuality? And what was false and misleading?

a) Direct quote from WSJ said "unsafe as 9/10/2001"

b) I said wars went on for 6 years (Afghanistan+Iraq). True fact!

c) I said the total cost so far was about half a trillion. True Fact!

d) I then asked a legitimate question of why they felt we were "unsafe"
after all that time and money.

I'm sorry, but I don't know what can be more factual than that, nor do I
see what is "false or misleading" about any of the statements I made.
Please be SPECIFIC in which statement(s) of mine you believe are "false
or misleading".

Also, even though the WSJ was my *secondary* source, I hope you can now
see why I mentioned it; unless you have an actual recording of a radio
broadcast, it can be difficult to remember exactly what was said. If you
have a secondary source in *print* (from a conservative, right-wing
source no less), it can go a long way towards removing confusion (except
in your case, where it seems to be causing confusion).

- There were TWO stories on BBC. The FIRST story
- (that I heard and quoted) and then the SECOND story
- of Bush's denial that you quoted.

But the first was not a American Bashing Story
- - - Which is what you tried to turn it in to.

I didn't try and "turn it" into anything. Just a direct quote from a
conservative, right wing source, which in turn lead to a fair,
reasonable and perfectly justified question--namely, after all this time
and all this money, why are we still at 9/10/01? Again, a FAIR and
REASONABLE question. NO bashing intended, but if you insist on seeing it
that way, that's YOUR problem.

And I liked the second story better because it
Told the Truth : As I See It [.]

Well, gee, -personal- likes. So what? Just because you "like" something
is not germane to an intellectual discussion. I'm pretty sure you like
pizza more than you like Brussel sprouts, but so what?

* Do NOT promote Your Liberal Anti-American Political
Propaganda

Legitimately asking if our tax dollars were spent wisely is
"Anti-American"? Legitimately asking why we are no safer is propaganda?
I'm sorry, but you have that backwards: it's Pro-American!

- Think for a minute (I know it's hard, but try):
- there had to be something that came first
- (my quoted story) for there to be something
- for Bush to deny (your second story). Timing
- is everything. You simply missed the first
- BBC story.

I did 'think' {Oh It Hurts My Tiny Little Brain}
and caught you Propagandizing [.]
The fact that you are still trying to peddle these
Liberal Democrat Lies and Left-Wing Distortions
is simply more evidence that your agenda was
to Bash America and Blame the US President
George "W" Bush.

Please see all of my responses above. Not bashing, not a lie, no
distortions--except in your overheated "Tiny Little Brain".

And yes, W does get the credit--or the blame. "The buck stops here"
means the President's desk--for better or worse. What part of that
simple statement don't you understand? W is not perfect; he can and has
made mistakes, and like all of us, he is responsible for what he has
done, good or bad. And 70+% of the American public thinks he has done
bad. (Just to anticipate you, that was not bashing or propaganda, Just a
simple statement of fact from many polls as presented by many sources).

Fighting for Truth, Justice and the American Way !

Jeez, try not to get your cape caught in your zipper...and don't slam
the door on that telephone booth.

- OK, so again you think what came from the front
- page of the Wall Street Journal (my *secondary*
- source) is liberal and left wing. Your opinion,
- can't argue with that.

Zeke - You do not need a 2nd Source -if- You are Truthful
to begin with.

I'm sorry you *STILL* don't get it. Yes, I was truthful to begin with.
However, a radio newscast (and radio waves) are a very ephemeral thing.
Once the broadcast is over, it's gone. A second source is given as a
-courtesy- for those who wish to verify my statement but missed the
broadcast.

But your follow-on statements were not from the BBC
there were simply more LL&LWD . {Propaganda}

My follow up statements were true:

-the war has gone on for 6 years
-we have spent half a trillion dollars

And after those two facts, I asked a simple, logical and legitimate
question any reasonably intelligent person would be within their rights
to ask.

Whether I heard the BBC Broacast or not does not
mean that it did not exist : But your follow-on
statements which were not from the BBC there were
simply more LL&LWD . {Propaganda}

No, it was simply a logical and legitimate question any reasonably
intelligent person would be within their rights to ask.

Fact: We have been fighting the "Global War on Terrorism" for 6 years.

Fact: We have spent half a trillion to date.

Fact: The Beeb (and the right wing WSJ) reported we were in as much
danger as we were before the "War on Terrorism" started.

Now, it seems that any person with half a brain would be within their
rights to ask why this is so. Not bashing, not anti-American, not
propaganda--just a simple, fair, legitimate question.

Now please, don't be so rigid in your "party-line" thinking and don't be
such a nazi that you think people should not be able to question their
government without being accused of being "anti-American". If your "Tiny
Little Brain" gave it a just moment's thought, you would realize
questioning your government is PRO-American. That's how America came
into being--by "questioning" King George (the English one).

(OT) : Caution - Be 'nice' To Zeke -or- He Might Call You A "Nazi"

Zeke - Present What The BBC Actually Said :
Quote the New Story Headline and give a Link :
Do Not Propagandize
* Everyone in this NewsGroup can 'choose' to Read
-or- Not Read Your Post.
* Everyone in this NewsGroup can 'choose' to Click-On
and Read -or- Not Click-On and Read the Link.
* Everyone in this NewsGroup can 'decide' for Themselves
what their Conclusions Are about Your Post and the Link.
- - - Your Propagandizing just gets in the way of the Truth :
As The Read See It [.]
The-Bottom-Line : Some Will Agree -and-
Some Will Disagree - It Is Their Choice.

Zeke - Simply put your original Post was written {slanted}
as Bush Bashing / Blame Bush Propaganda [.]

Everything Else You Do Zeke is Backtracking to Cover-Up that Fact.

Now in this Post Zeke - You Lose-It by calling 'me' a "NAZI" .

Oh I Am So Hurt - You Called Me a NAZI
Oh Meo Oh Myo - How Will I Ever Recover ?

NOTE TO ZEKE : Remember the First-One to use the Word
"NAZI" {Call Someone a NAZI} in a Post the Loses the Debate.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Godwin's_Law
- - - zekey, Zekey. ZEKEY ! - YOU LOSE [.]

Why It Just Hurts My Tiny Brain to 'think'
about all those Big Things that You Said. ~ RHF

Stunning news heard on BBC!!!
 

Me wrote:
On Thu, 12 Jul 2007 15:01:57 GMT, Zeke Zzzzpt
wrote:

Stunning news heard on the Beeb today, July 12...

"A U.S. threat assessment finds al Qaeda has rebuilt its capability to
mount attacks to a pre September 11 level".

Now, hold on a minute, folks...

--Hundreds of billions spent on "Homeland Security".

--Hundreds of billions spent on the "War on Global Terrorism" in
Afghanistan and Iraq for the last SIX YEARS.

--Tens of thousands of lives lost on both sides.

... and after -all that-, we are back at Square One???

Truly, we can say "Heckuva job, George"!


Did it ever occur to you liberal mouth-breathing morons that Al Qaida
would be EVEN STRONGER right now if President Bush hadn't gotten in
their face and started killing them in Afghanistan and Iraq?

No, of course not. That would be too logical for a Marxist "useful
idiot" like you.

I suppose it's somewhat comforting to know that you liberal
fudgepackers will be the first ones beheaded by the Muslims.

liberal
mouth breathing
moron
Marxist
useful idiot
liberal
fudgepacker

Not bad...seven names in only three sentences. Well, they say
name-calling is the last resort of the intellectually challenged. Thank
you for proving it.

Did it ever occur to YOU that there were ZERO al Qaeda in Iraq before
Bush came in?

Did it ever occur to YOU that with very little electricity, no fuel,
broken fresh water supplies and broken sewage systems, unsafe to send
your kids to school, no jobs (due to Bremer's 'de-Baathification'),
35,000 dead civilians (probably higher, but Bush himself admitted to
this number), Abu Ghrib prison scandal, raping and killing 14 year old
girls and then murdering their family, that WE are -creating- al Qaeda
recruits faster than we can kill 'em.

(OT) : Caution - Be 'nice' To Zeke -or- He Might Call You A "Nazi"
 

On Jul 15, 2:11 pm, Zeke Zzzzpt wrote:
Me wrote:
On Thu, 12 Jul 2007 15:01:57 GMT, Zeke Zzzzpt
wrote:

Stunning news heard on the Beeb today, July 12...

"A U.S. threat assessment finds al Qaeda has rebuilt its capability to
mount attacks to a pre September 11 level".

Now, hold on a minute, folks...

--Hundreds of billions spent on "Homeland Security".

--Hundreds of billions spent on the "War on Global Terrorism" in
Afghanistan and Iraq for the last SIX YEARS.

--Tens of thousands of lives lost on both sides.

... and after -all that-, we are back at Square One???

Truly, we can say "Heckuva job, George"!

Did it ever occur to you liberal mouth-breathing morons that Al Qaida
would be EVEN STRONGER right now if President Bush hadn't gotten in
their face and started killing them in Afghanistan and Iraq?

No, of course not. That would be too logical for a Marxist "useful
idiot" like you.

I suppose it's somewhat comforting to know that you liberal
fudgepackers will be the first ones beheaded by the Muslims.

liberal
mouth breathing
moron
Marxist
useful idiot
liberal
fudgepacker

Not bad...seven names in only three sentences. Well, they say
name-calling is the last resort of the intellectually challenged. Thank
you for proving it.

Did it ever occur to YOU that there were ZERO al Qaeda in Iraq before
Bush came in?

Did it ever occur to YOU that with very little electricity, no fuel,
broken fresh water supplies and broken sewage systems, unsafe to send
your kids to school, no jobs (due to Bremer's 'de-Baathification'),
35,000 dead civilians (probably higher, but Bush himself admitted to
this number), Abu Ghrib prison scandal, raping and killing 14 year old
girls and then murdering their family, that WE are -creating- al Qaeda
recruits faster than we can kill 'em.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Zeke - Does Name Calling Up-Set You ?

Zeke - Have You forgotten "NAZI" - Oh that's right You
were the First-One to Call someone a NAZI in this Thread.

(OT) : Caution - Be 'nice' To Zeke -or- He Might Call You A "Nazi"

NOTE TO ZEKE : Remember the First-One to use the Word
"NAZI" {Call Someone a NAZI} in a Post the Loses the Debate.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Godwin's_Law
- - - zekey, Zekey. ZEKEY ! - YOU LOSE [.]

zeke - how soon we froget . . .
with the word 'nazi' bouncing around
my little brain causing me to 'think'
oh it hurts when i 'think' ~ RHF

(OT) : Stunning News NOT Heard on the BBC !
 

On Sat, 14 Jul 2007 00:06:32 -0700, RHF wrote:

On Jul 13, 11:37 pm, Barnard Peters wrote:
On Thu, 12 Jul 2007 15:01:57 +0000, Zeke Zzzzpt wrote:
... and after -all that-, we are back at Square One???

Truly, we can say "Heckuva job, George"!

But had a fantastic year now that they cut-n-run out-a
the country with our tax free money. And GW still wants to give-m more!

BP,

Point-of-Fact one of the Largest Investers in . just
died Lady Bird Johnson Oops : She was a Democrat. - - - Oh the Long Nose
and

There is a difference between people who knowingly screw the tax payers
(without remorse much less) and people who are passive victims of other
people's doings. Unfortunately, My gubberment retirement investment
has Halliburton and Micro$oft stocks but I am unable to simply drop that
part of the investment.

I suspect your AT&T, ComCast (or any other large name communications
company) knowingly supplies most of the child porn on the internet yet you
pay a monthly fee. Does that mean you support child porn?

I simply can not see Ladybird J knowingly say that she is all right with
killing our boys overseas to increase her stocks on Halliburton. But, I
can see this easily from Bush and Cheney!

Stunning news heard on BBC!!!
 

RHF wrote:

Zeke - Present What The BBC Actually Said :

RHF, your "Tiny Little Brain" (your term, not mine) must be severely
overheating. I've already said it three times... I DID NOT TAPE the
newscast. Presumably, most people don't tape every newscast (although
I'm sure some do). I paraphrased / quoted the story as best I could
without actually taping it. This is EXACTLY WHY I gave an ADDITIONAL
print reference that is easily obtainable and widely available to
others. It is the SAME story. It was NOT -exclusive- to the BBC (but
certainly heard there). Why is your "Tiny Little Brain" having such a
hard time understanding this? It really ain't that complicated.

Quote the New Story Headline and give a Link :

I DID quote a link, readily available to all, especially those who did
not tape the broadcast: "The July 12 Wall Street Journal, Page 1, Column
2". You don't have to get everything off the web, you know. If the WSJ
is too left-wing and too liberal for you or you're too lazy to go to
your local library, that's your problem.

Now in this Post Zeke - You Lose-It by calling 'me' a "NAZI" .

Oh I Am So Hurt - You Called Me a NAZI
Oh Meo Oh Myo - How Will I Ever Recover ?

NOTE TO ZEKE : Remember the First-One to use the Word
"NAZI" {Call Someone a NAZI} in a Post the Loses the Debate.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Godwin's_Law
- - - zekey, Zekey. ZEKEY ! - YOU LOSE [.]

Huh?

NOTE TO RHF: Give ME a link showing where -I- agreed to such a thing. I
don't consider myself bound to "Godwin"--whoever he is. Plus he seems to
overlook and arbitrarily eliminate the possibility that in some
debates, such a comparison may indeed be legitimate and justified. In
any event, the debate is not about that.

Bottom line: I think it is every American's right and even duty to
question their government when it is felt to be necessary. I consider it
pro-American. Our Founding Fathers thought so too.

You, on the other hand, seem to BLINDLY and MINDLESSLY follow along,
right OR wrong. Furthermore, you call people liars, liberals,
anti-American and propagandists for those who dare to exercise their
rights to question. Sounds pretty anti-American and Fascist to me.

auf Wiedersehen, Herr RHF...