Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #2   Report Post  
Old July 21st 07, 07:44 PM posted to sci.electronics.basics,rec.radio.shortwave,rec.radio.amateur.antenna,alt.cellular.cingular,alt.internet.wireless
RHF RHF is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jun 2006
Posts: 8,652
Default How I would like to change the *digital* cell phone industry.

On Jul 21, 11:14 am, Don Bowey wrote:
On 7/21/07 11:00 AM, in article
,

"Kurt Ullman" wrote:
In article ,
Don Bowey wrote:


You miss my point. Why do you think the iPhone is so successful?
Why the iPod?


Until there are more facts, the iPhone's current success is due to people
wanting a very cool instrument with good features.


Which is pretty much the definition of putting out a product that the
public wants. But, yet, I seem to have feelings that you did not mean
this as a positive.


You are reading in something I did not say.

The iPhone is off to a great start, but it has no track record at this time.
I anticipate that it will be very successful, but we can only guess at it
now. From an investor point-of-view, I think the monthly kickback from AT&T
that Apple negotiated, is good. From a personal POV I think it sucks, and
will likely antagonize Apple supporters.


IPhone Buyers and Users -and- Apple Supporters
may not be one and the same. ~ RHF

  #3   Report Post  
Old July 22nd 07, 03:40 AM posted to sci.electronics.basics,rec.radio.shortwave,rec.radio.amateur.antenna,alt.cellular.cingular,alt.internet.wireless
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jul 2007
Posts: 25
Default How I would like to change the *digital* cell phone industry.

In article . com,
RHF wrote:

On Jul 21, 11:14 am, Don Bowey wrote:
On 7/21/07 11:00 AM, in article
,

"Kurt Ullman" wrote:
In article ,
Don Bowey wrote:


You miss my point. Why do you think the iPhone is so successful?
Why the iPod?


Until there are more facts, the iPhone's current success is due to people
wanting a very cool instrument with good features.


Which is pretty much the definition of putting out a product that the
public wants. But, yet, I seem to have feelings that you did not mean
this as a positive.


You are reading in something I did not say.

The iPhone is off to a great start, but it has no track record at this time.
I anticipate that it will be very successful, but we can only guess at it
now. From an investor point-of-view, I think the monthly kickback from AT&T
that Apple negotiated, is good. From a personal POV I think it sucks, and
will likely antagonize Apple supporters.


IPhone Buyers and Users -and- Apple Supporters
may not be one and the same. ~ RHF


Bottom line - People want products that work for them. Period.
Mac delivers, like them or not.

--
To reply by email, remove the word "space"
  #4   Report Post  
Old July 22nd 07, 07:19 PM posted to sci.electronics.basics,rec.radio.shortwave,rec.radio.amateur.antenna,alt.cellular.cingular,alt.internet.wireless
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jul 2007
Posts: 4
Default How I would like to change the *digital* cell phone industry.

At 21 Jul 2007 19:40:38 -0700 Kurt wrote:

Bottom line - People want products that work for them. Period.
Mac delivers, like them or not.



Yet Macs have been around for 20 years and still only have a 5% market
share- clearly they "deliver" something those 5% want, but not something
"everyone" wants.

In the iPhone's case, the potential market is fairly large, but not the
entire cellphone market, like our resident troll "none" believes, simply
because the entire cellphone market is not interested in smartphones,
regardless of how "smart" the phone is. Many people simply won't trade a
physical 12-key phone dialpad for access to Youtube or Google, period.

I'm not in that category obviously, nor are you, but the VAST majority of
people simply are. Those people, even if they were clamoring for an MP3
phone, would likely prefer a ROKR to an iPhone!



--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

  #5   Report Post  
Old July 21st 07, 09:17 PM posted to rec.radio.shortwave
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Apr 2007
Posts: 46
Default How I would like to change the *digital* cell phone industry.

Tell us more about your cell phone plan!
On Jul 21, 11:14 am, Don Bowey wrote:
On 7/21/07 11:00 AM, in article
,

"Kurt Ullman" wrote:
In article ,
Don Bowey wrote:


You miss my point. Why do you think the iPhone is so successful?
Why the iPod?


Until there are more facts, the iPhone's current success is due to people
wanting a very cool instrument with good features.


Which is pretty much the definition of putting out a product that the
public wants. But, yet, I seem to have feelings that you did not mean
this as a positive.


You are reading in something I did not say.

The iPhone is off to a great start, but it has no track record at this time.
I anticipate that it will be very successful, but we can only guess at it
now. From an investor point-of-view, I think the monthly kickback from AT&T
that Apple negotiated, is good. From a personal POV I think it sucks, and
will likely antagonize Apple supporters.





Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
A more rational approach -- how I would like to change the cell phone industry. Radium[_2_] Antenna 66 September 1st 07 08:50 PM
A more rational approach -- how I would like to change the cell phone industry. Radium[_2_] Shortwave 54 September 1st 07 08:50 PM
How I would like to change the *digital* cell phone industry. Radium[_2_] Antenna 60 July 24th 07 09:07 AM
How I would like to change the cell phone industry [was AM electromagnetic waves: 20 KHz modulation frequency on an astronomically-low carrier frequency] Radium[_2_] Antenna 82 July 21st 07 10:05 PM
How I would like to change the cell phone industry [was AM electromagnetic waves: 20 KHz modulation frequency on an astronomically-low carrier frequency] Radium[_2_] Shortwave 70 July 21st 07 10:05 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:29 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017