And of course the Star & Sickle (Tribune) comes out with an editorial today
blaming the bridge collapse on our Republican Gov. Effing moonbats.

There is an article (Analysis of the MN Bridge Collaspe) at
www.stevequayle.com (click on the big Q) about that Minneapolis
Bridge.

A Bridge can be something as simple as a wooden plank thrown across a
ditch so people won't have to step into the mud.Some Bridges around the
World are marvels of Engineering and very complicated.

www.devilfinder.com The oldest Bridges in the World.
cuhulin

MnMikew wrote:

And of course the Star & Sickle (Tribune) comes out with an editorial today
blaming the bridge collapse on our Republican Gov. Effing moonbats.

Heck, I'd heard earlier that it was the fault of Dick Cheney. He was down in the
bunker, playing with the joystick and accidentally zapped the bridge.

He had been trying to work up another Katrina class storm.

dxAce
Michigan
USA

"dxAce" wrote in message
...


MnMikew wrote:

And of course the Star & Sickle (Tribune) comes out with an editorial
today
blaming the bridge collapse on our Republican Gov. Effing moonbats.

Heck, I'd heard earlier that it was the fault of Dick Cheney. He was down
in the
bunker, playing with the joystick and accidentally zapped the bridge.

He had been trying to work up another Katrina class storm.

I waiting for some idiot in the MSM to blame it on Bush somehow. Or global
warming. I know my drive to work is F'd for a few years.

wrote in message
...
On Thu, 2 Aug 2007 15:23:49 -0500, "MnMikew"
wrote:

And of course the Star & Sickle (Tribune) comes out with an editorial
today
blaming the bridge collapse on our Republican Gov. Effing moonbats.

happened on his watch

I'll keep that in mind in case the Dopeocrats get elected.

MnMikew wrote:
And of course the Star & Sickle (Tribune) comes out with an editorial today
blaming the bridge collapse on our Republican Gov. Effing moonbats.



It'll be Bush's fault before the weekend.


Stories are beginning to surface about the history of this bridge,
and how it was never intended to be an arterial conduit in the first place.

"D Peter Maus" wrote in message
...
MnMikew wrote:
And of course the Star & Sickle (Tribune) comes out with an editorial
today blaming the bridge collapse on our Republican Gov. Effing moonbats.

It'll be Bush's fault before the weekend.


Stories are beginning to surface about the history of this bridge, and
how it was never intended to be an arterial conduit in the first place.

Yup. 40 years old and weak. Not good. Even though it was built in 1967 it
will still be Bushs fault. :-)

MnMikew wrote:

"D Peter Maus" wrote in message
...
MnMikew wrote:
And of course the Star & Sickle (Tribune) comes out with an editorial
today blaming the bridge collapse on our Republican Gov. Effing moonbats.

It'll be Bush's fault before the weekend.


Stories are beginning to surface about the history of this bridge, and
how it was never intended to be an arterial conduit in the first place.

Yup. 40 years old and weak. Not good. Even though it was built in 1967 it
will still be Bushs fault. :-)

Yeah, that's it! George and his brother were running coke to Minneapolis and
they thought they were being followed, buried the stuff near one of the supports
of the bridge, and boom, 40 years later the results of their digging brought the
bridge down.

MnMikew wrote:
"D Peter Maus" wrote in message
...
MnMikew wrote:
And of course the Star & Sickle (Tribune) comes out with an editorial
today blaming the bridge collapse on our Republican Gov. Effing moonbats.
It'll be Bush's fault before the weekend.


Stories are beginning to surface about the history of this bridge, and
how it was never intended to be an arterial conduit in the first place.

Yup. 40 years old and weak. Not good. Even though it was built in 1967 it
will still be Bushs fault. :-)



In fact, I just got this from a friend in Iowa 10 minutes ago:




************************************************** *****************

well, it IS his fault, with hundreds of billons going to a worthless
war that should have been spent on infrastructure. But I know, it would
have just been spent on hundred-dollar blowjobs for his friends anyway . . .


-----Original Message-----
From: D. Peter Maus
To:
Sent: Thu, 2 Aug 2007 4:37 pm
Subject: Subjects Galore

wrote:
Hang in there. It could be worse. You could be in Milwaukee.
Or on a bridge in Minneapolis. . . .

Interesting stories are beginning to surface about the history of
that bridge. And how it was never intended to be a arterial structure.

I'm sure it will be Bush's fault before the weekend.

************************************************** *******************

D Peter Maus wrote:


well, it IS his fault, with hundreds of billons going to a worthless
war that should have been spent on infrastructure. But I know, it would
have just been spent on hundred-dollar blowjobs for his friends anyway .

Well, I wouldn't say it was Bush's fault.

However, given the choice of fixing our infrastructure, broken health
care system and all of our needs on the home front, I'd vote for
spending that half a trillion *here* rather than pouring it down that
bottomless **** hole...