Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sep 3, 12:44?pm, "David Eduardo" wrote:
"Steve" wrote in message ps.com... Sounds like you've finally matured a bit and now see the merits of FM and the folly of HD-AM. Congratulations. Quite the contrary. It has been known by broadcasters for some time that there is no way to get any significant number of listeners under 55 to tune to AM, and the average age of AM listeners is increasing each year as a consequence. Some AMs have moved to FM. Others are simulcasting. Others have no FM to move to, and are slowly losing revenue. Those AMs have, perhaps, some chance to survive via HD. Otherwise, AM will be pretty much a thing of the past and only relevant or viable for very niche formats or in some rural areas where there are no local FMs. Of course, this is not an immediate do or die type thing; HD can develop over the next few years and AMs can attempt to restore some interest among under-55s via the improved quality. INSIDERADIO: "INSIDE STORY: News/Talk/Sports: Radio's Last Bastion" "Music FMs of any flavor are utterly screwed... Which is why News/Talk/ Sports is radio's last bastion... Right now -- while FMs are losing the music audience to new media -- satellite radio is offering more News/Talk/Sports programming than we can fit on AM radio... Accordingly, I urge owners of AM/FM clusters which include a News/Talk/ Sports AM to drop an FM music format and simulcast the News/Talk/ Sports AM... Imagine how smart you will look if -- suddenly -- your entire market can now hear the News/Talk/Sports assets which are radio's most-Sales-friendly programming..." http://ftp.media.radcity.net/ZMST/daily/IS031005.htm Claiming that AM radio is dying, when the music FMs are screwed - yea, IBOC, with its jamming and poor coverage, is going to same AM ! You are nothing more than an IBOC shill-parrot ! |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|