Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Steve" wrote in message ups.com... On Sep 4, 9:45 pm, IBOCcrock wrote: Well, Even though its getting on in the evening, I'm not going to send everyone to an early sleep with a lengthy dissertation as to why I feel the way I do on this divisive but important subject. That has been expressed many times by others more eloquently than I can. I don't expect at this point to change anyone's mind on the subject; conversely, I doubt any one will alter my convictions either. The basic fact for us down here is for the past 82 years we have, and still, derive significant revenue from our sky-wave coverage area and we are committed to protecting that tradition. I do look forward to the discourse after September 14th when the evidence and data is documented. I also look forward to working with our coalition of broadcasters whether it is to find solutions or seek damages. Best regards, Watt Hairston WSM-AM, Grand Ole Opry, LLC. What was that you were saying, Eduardo ? He was saying whatever he was making up (out of thin air) at the time. One station. There are 4800 AM stations, About 5 make money from skywave coverage, and most of the rest have reduced coverage at night due to interference. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
WSM-AM: Significant revenue from our sky-wave coverage ! | Shortwave | |||
WSM-AM: Significant revenue from our sky-wave coverage ! | Shortwave | |||
SCYF now adds new technology, forecast $15 Million in Revenue | General | |||
"Clear Channel Radio Ad Revenue Slips" | Broadcasting | |||
Newbie ?: I've Built A Simple 1/4 Wave Dipole for 2 Mtrs. Could IMake a1/2 Wave? | Homebrew |