HD Hypocrisy
 

On Sep 15, 7:48 am, Steve wrote:
On Sep 15, 10:36 am, "David Eduardo" wrote:





"RHF" wrote in message

oups.com...

d'Eduardo - Point-of-Fact : Not True - Think About It ! ~ RHF
.

A Chicano is, and only is, a born American of Mexican heritage.- Hide
quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

d'Edaurdo here is what you wrote the first time :

"All Chicanos are born in the US."

Now you have revised it; and here is what you are writing now:

"A Chicano is, and only is, a born American of Mexican heritage."

There is a 'big' difference in the two statements.

All Chicanos are born in the US. A Chicano can not be born elsewhere. All
are born in the US of parents of Mexican heritage... in other words, a
Chicano is a Mexican American, but not all Mexican Americans consider
themselves Chicanos.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Some Chicanos live in California are Californians, but not all
Californians are Chicanos.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Some Chicanos live in California are Californianos,
but not all Californians are Chicanos.

Many Californians are Gringos ~43% ~ RHF
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/California#Demographics

HD Hypocrisy
 

"Steve" wrote in message
ps.com...

The investment was less in cost than the last new studio we built in
LA...
one single studio (out of 16)... so the issue is not the investment,
which
is minor. The issue is moving terrestrial, free, radio into the digital
era.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

The issue is moving lots and lots of money into the pockets of
stockholders.


No, it is not.

HD Hypocrisy
 

"RHF" wrote in message
ps.com...

El Sorprender Hormona Humana Del Crecimiento (HHdC)
HHdC = http://rajeun.net/comprando.html
http://usuarios.lycos.es/Megamuscle/...rmonacreci.htm
Usted puede obtener sí resultados increíbles

ahora nos estamos comunicando
apenas para la diversión de ella ~ RHF

HD Hypocrisy
 

David Eduardo wrote:

"Steve" wrote in message
ps.com...

The investment was less in cost than the last new studio we built in
LA...
one single studio (out of 16)... so the issue is not the investment,
which
is minor. The issue is moving terrestrial, free, radio into the digital
era.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

The issue is moving lots and lots of money into the pockets of
stockholders.


No, it is not.

Liar, liar, pantalunes on fire!

HD Hypocrisy
 

On Sep 16, 1:52 pm, "David Eduardo" wrote:
"Steve" wrote in message

ps.com...



The investment was less in cost than the last new studio we built in
LA...
one single studio (out of 16)... so the issue is not the investment,
which
is minor. The issue is moving terrestrial, free, radio into the digital
era.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

The issue is moving lots and lots of money into the pockets of
stockholders.

No, it is not.

Yes, it is.

HD Hypocrisy
 

"Steve" wrote in message
ups.com...
On Sep 16, 1:52 pm, "David Eduardo" wrote:
"Steve" wrote in message

ps.com...



The investment was less in cost than the last new studio we built in
LA...
one single studio (out of 16)... so the issue is not the investment,
which
is minor. The issue is moving terrestrial, free, radio into the
digital
era.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

The issue is moving lots and lots of money into the pockets of
stockholders.

No, it is not.

Yes, it is.

If there are no publicly traded shares to establish a price, any share
transactions are negotiated between the existing shareholders. Options and
similar executive incentives are only of value when exercised. Since there
have been no changes in the existing ownership, there is no opportunity for
any profits. And since iBiquity is not profitable, there are no dividends,
either (most startups and small cap companies don't pay dividends generally,
either).

HD Hypocrisy
 

On Sep 16, 7:18 pm, "David Eduardo" wrote:
"Steve" wrote in message

ups.com...





On Sep 16, 1:52 pm, "David Eduardo" wrote:
"Steve" wrote in message

oups.com...

The investment was less in cost than the last new studio we built in
LA...
one single studio (out of 16)... so the issue is not the investment,
which
is minor. The issue is moving terrestrial, free, radio into the
digital
era.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

The issue is moving lots and lots of money into the pockets of
stockholders.

No, it is not.

Yes, it is.

If there are no publicly traded shares to establish a price, any share
transactions are negotiated between the existing shareholders. Options and
similar executive incentives are only of value when exercised. Since there
have been no changes in the existing ownership, there is no opportunity for
any profits. And since iBiquity is not profitable, there are no dividends,
either (most startups and small cap companies don't pay dividends generally,
either).- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

And are you saying that IBiquity wants and intends to remain
unprofitable?

HD Hypocrisy
 

"Steve" wrote in message
oups.com...
On Sep 16, 7:18 pm, "David Eduardo" wrote:

And are you saying that IBiquity wants and intends to remain
unprofitable?


It's a developmental startup.

Satellite radio began development in the early 90's, and is losing about a
billion dollars a year... yet the companies involved believe they can be
profitable in the future and give value to the shareholders.

HD Hypocrisy
 

On Sep 16, 7:43 pm, "David Eduardo" wrote:
"Steve" wrote in message

oups.com...

On Sep 16, 7:18 pm, "David Eduardo" wrote:

And are you saying that IBiquity wants and intends to remain
unprofitable?

It's a developmental startup.

Satellite radio began development in the early 90's, and is losing about a
billion dollars a year... yet the companies involved believe they can be
profitable in the future and give value to the shareholders.

Right. It's about the money.

HD Hypocrisy
 

"Steve" wrote in message
ups.com...
On Sep 16, 7:43 pm, "David Eduardo" wrote:
"Steve" wrote in message

oups.com...

On Sep 16, 7:18 pm, "David Eduardo" wrote:

And are you saying that IBiquity wants and intends to remain
unprofitable?

It's a developmental startup.

Satellite radio began development in the early 90's, and is losing about
a
billion dollars a year... yet the companies involved believe they can be
profitable in the future and give value to the shareholders.

Right. It's about the money.

Without money, there is no free radio. You can always pay $150 a year for
satellite... because that is the satellite model, also about money. One gets
ad revenues, the other charges the listeners. Your choice.