Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sep 23, 6:44 pm, "David Eduardo" wrote:
"Steve" wrote in message ups.com... On Sep 23, 4:02 pm, "David Eduardo" wrote: In correct. The new chipsets will be considerably less expensive than the existing ones. See press releases on iBiquity website. Not according to Samsung. They predict that the chipsets will be very expensive indeed. You are making things up again. Samsung's words, not mine. You're just playing some kind of joke on us, right? |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Steve" wrote in message ups.com... On Sep 23, 6:44 pm, "David Eduardo" wrote: "Steve" wrote in message ups.com... On Sep 23, 4:02 pm, "David Eduardo" wrote: In correct. The new chipsets will be considerably less expensive than the existing ones. See press releases on iBiquity website. Not according to Samsung. They predict that the chipsets will be very expensive indeed. You are making things up again. Samsung's words, not mine. You're just playing some kind of joke on us, right? Every article I could find mentioned that the chips would be low in energy consumption and in price. I found nothing referring to higher prices than existing chipset costs. |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sep 23, 8:41 pm, "David Eduardo" wrote:
"Steve" wrote in message ups.com... On Sep 23, 6:44 pm, "David Eduardo" wrote: "Steve" wrote in message roups.com... On Sep 23, 4:02 pm, "David Eduardo" wrote: In correct. The new chipsets will be considerably less expensive than the existing ones. See press releases on iBiquity website. Not according to Samsung. They predict that the chipsets will be very expensive indeed. You are making things up again. Samsung's words, not mine. You're just playing some kind of joke on us, right? Every article I could find mentioned that the chips would be low in energy consumption and in price. I found nothing referring to higher prices than existing chipset costs. - Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - You must not be looking very hard. |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
"David Eduardo" wrote: "Steve" wrote in message ups.com... On Sep 23, 6:44 pm, "David Eduardo" wrote: "Steve" wrote in message ups.com... On Sep 23, 4:02 pm, "David Eduardo" wrote: In correct. The new chipsets will be considerably less expensive than the existing ones. See press releases on iBiquity website. Not according to Samsung. They predict that the chipsets will be very expensive indeed. You are making things up again. Samsung's words, not mine. You're just playing some kind of joke on us, right? Every article I could find mentioned that the chips would be low in energy consumption and in price. I found nothing referring to higher prices than existing chipset costs. I looked around on on the Samsung web site and the only reference I could find is the original announcement #172. There is no information on engineering samples of this module. Not a good sign for its development. There should be at least a projection of samples by now according to the news release. Looks like more vaporware to me. http://www.sem.samsung.com/cms/_work/en/company/news/newsList.jsp Looks like Eduardo will be pulling that diehard battery cart so far. -- Telamon Ventura, California |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sep 23, 9:39 pm, Telamon
wrote: In article , "David Eduardo" wrote: "Steve" wrote in message oups.com... On Sep 23, 6:44 pm, "David Eduardo" wrote: "Steve" wrote in message roups.com... On Sep 23, 4:02 pm, "David Eduardo" wrote: In correct. The new chipsets will be considerably less expensive than the existing ones. See press releases on iBiquity website. Not according to Samsung. They predict that the chipsets will be very expensive indeed. You are making things up again. Samsung's words, not mine. You're just playing some kind of joke on us, right? Every article I could find mentioned that the chips would be low in energy consumption and in price. I found nothing referring to higher prices than existing chipset costs. I looked around on on the Samsung web site and the only reference I could find is the original announcement #172. There is no information on engineering samples of this module. Not a good sign for its development. There should be at least a projection of samples by now according to the news release. Looks like more vaporware to me. http://www.sem.samsung.com/cms/_work/en/company/news/newsList.jsp Looks like Eduardo will be pulling that diehard battery cart so far. -- Telamon Ventura, California- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - SiPort was also shilling for a low-power HD chipset, but no word anymore from them - must have given up. |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article . com,
Steve wrote: On Sep 23, 6:44 pm, "David Eduardo" wrote: "Steve" wrote in message ups.com... On Sep 23, 4:02 pm, "David Eduardo" wrote: In correct. The new chipsets will be considerably less expensive than the existing ones. See press releases on iBiquity website. Not according to Samsung. They predict that the chipsets will be very expensive indeed. You are making things up again. Samsung's words, not mine. You're just playing some kind of joke on us, right? It will definitely be expensive in the beginning. The only way it will not be expensive in time is for that chip to become a commodity with a very large volume. -- Telamon Ventura, California |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Lennie's Back In Form...Old Rant's...Same Form... | Policy | |||
What Liberal Talk Radio Needs to Do - To Survive and Grow [Was: Al Franken on shortwave] | Shortwave | |||
Will displacement current form a close loop ? | Antenna | |||
How does a 6146B fail? | Boatanchors | |||
where PCTA's fail in logic | Policy |