Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old September 24th 07, 12:57 AM posted to rec.radio.shortwave
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,324
Default FM HD in its current form will likely survive it's unlikely AM HD will fail.

On Sep 23, 6:44 pm, "David Eduardo" wrote:
"Steve" wrote in message

ups.com...

On Sep 23, 4:02 pm, "David Eduardo" wrote:


In correct. The new chipsets will be considerably less expensive than the
existing ones. See press releases on iBiquity website.


Not according to Samsung. They predict that the chipsets will be very
expensive indeed.


You are making things up again.



Samsung's words, not mine. You're just playing some kind of joke on
us, right?

  #2   Report Post  
Old September 24th 07, 01:41 AM posted to rec.radio.shortwave
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jun 2007
Posts: 1,817
Default FM HD in its current form will likely survive it's unlikely AM HD will fail.


"Steve" wrote in message
ups.com...
On Sep 23, 6:44 pm, "David Eduardo" wrote:
"Steve" wrote in message

ups.com...

On Sep 23, 4:02 pm, "David Eduardo" wrote:


In correct. The new chipsets will be considerably less expensive than
the
existing ones. See press releases on iBiquity website.


Not according to Samsung. They predict that the chipsets will be very
expensive indeed.


You are making things up again.



Samsung's words, not mine. You're just playing some kind of joke on
us, right?


Every article I could find mentioned that the chips would be low in energy
consumption and in price. I found nothing referring to higher prices than
existing chipset costs.



  #3   Report Post  
Old September 24th 07, 02:20 AM posted to rec.radio.shortwave
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,324
Default FM HD in its current form will likely survive it's unlikely AM HD will fail.

On Sep 23, 8:41 pm, "David Eduardo" wrote:
"Steve" wrote in message

ups.com...





On Sep 23, 6:44 pm, "David Eduardo" wrote:
"Steve" wrote in message


roups.com...


On Sep 23, 4:02 pm, "David Eduardo" wrote:


In correct. The new chipsets will be considerably less expensive than
the
existing ones. See press releases on iBiquity website.


Not according to Samsung. They predict that the chipsets will be very
expensive indeed.


You are making things up again.


Samsung's words, not mine. You're just playing some kind of joke on
us, right?


Every article I could find mentioned that the chips would be low in energy
consumption and in price. I found nothing referring to higher prices than
existing chipset costs.



- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -


You must not be looking very hard.

  #4   Report Post  
Old September 24th 07, 02:39 AM posted to rec.radio.shortwave
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 4,494
Default FM HD in its current form will likely survive it's unlikely AM HD will fail.

In article ,
"David Eduardo" wrote:

"Steve" wrote in message
ups.com...
On Sep 23, 6:44 pm, "David Eduardo" wrote:
"Steve" wrote in message

ups.com...

On Sep 23, 4:02 pm, "David Eduardo" wrote:

In correct. The new chipsets will be considerably less expensive than
the
existing ones. See press releases on iBiquity website.

Not according to Samsung. They predict that the chipsets will be very
expensive indeed.

You are making things up again.



Samsung's words, not mine. You're just playing some kind of joke on
us, right?


Every article I could find mentioned that the chips would be low in energy
consumption and in price. I found nothing referring to higher prices than
existing chipset costs.


I looked around on on the Samsung web site and the only reference I
could find is the original announcement #172.

There is no information on engineering samples of this module. Not a
good sign for its development. There should be at least a projection of
samples by now according to the news release. Looks like more vaporware
to me.

http://www.sem.samsung.com/cms/_work/en/company/news/newsList.jsp

Looks like Eduardo will be pulling that diehard battery cart so far.

--
Telamon
Ventura, California
  #5   Report Post  
Old September 24th 07, 03:46 PM posted to rec.radio.shortwave
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Aug 2007
Posts: 707
Default FM HD in its current form will likely survive it's unlikely AM HD will fail.

On Sep 23, 9:39 pm, Telamon
wrote:
In article ,
"David Eduardo" wrote:





"Steve" wrote in message
oups.com...
On Sep 23, 6:44 pm, "David Eduardo" wrote:
"Steve" wrote in message


roups.com...


On Sep 23, 4:02 pm, "David Eduardo" wrote:


In correct. The new chipsets will be considerably less expensive than
the
existing ones. See press releases on iBiquity website.


Not according to Samsung. They predict that the chipsets will be very
expensive indeed.


You are making things up again.


Samsung's words, not mine. You're just playing some kind of joke on
us, right?


Every article I could find mentioned that the chips would be low in energy
consumption and in price. I found nothing referring to higher prices than
existing chipset costs.


I looked around on on the Samsung web site and the only reference I
could find is the original announcement #172.

There is no information on engineering samples of this module. Not a
good sign for its development. There should be at least a projection of
samples by now according to the news release. Looks like more vaporware
to me.

http://www.sem.samsung.com/cms/_work/en/company/news/newsList.jsp

Looks like Eduardo will be pulling that diehard battery cart so far.

--
Telamon
Ventura, California- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -


SiPort was also shilling for a low-power HD chipset, but no word
anymore from them - must have given up.



  #6   Report Post  
Old September 24th 07, 02:45 AM posted to rec.radio.shortwave
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 4,494
Default FM HD in its current form will likely survive it's unlikely AM HD will fail.

In article . com,
Steve wrote:

On Sep 23, 6:44 pm, "David Eduardo" wrote:
"Steve" wrote in message

ups.com...

On Sep 23, 4:02 pm, "David Eduardo" wrote:


In correct. The new chipsets will be considerably less expensive than the
existing ones. See press releases on iBiquity website.


Not according to Samsung. They predict that the chipsets will be very
expensive indeed.


You are making things up again.



Samsung's words, not mine. You're just playing some kind of joke on
us, right?


It will definitely be expensive in the beginning. The only way it will
not be expensive in time is for that chip to become a commodity with a
very large volume.

--
Telamon
Ventura, California
Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Lennie's Back In Form...Old Rant's...Same Form... K4YZ Policy 18 May 12th 05 11:59 PM
What Liberal Talk Radio Needs to Do - To Survive and Grow [Was: Al Franken on shortwave] Soames123 Shortwave 5 April 7th 04 01:56 PM
Will displacement current form a close loop ? ieee std Antenna 3 March 29th 04 03:31 PM
How does a 6146B fail? Angel Vilaseca Boatanchors 12 March 5th 04 07:30 PM
where PCTA's fail in logic Len Over 21 Policy 409 October 10th 03 10:21 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:52 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017