"Telamon" wrote in message
...
In article ,
"David Eduardo" wrote:

"Steve" wrote in message
ps.com...
On Sep 25, 10:43 am, "David Eduardo" wrote:

The worst thing you can do when debuting a new technology is give
crap
to the early adopters (who tend to spread the word).

My first CD player was crap.... and cost $1400.

We're very sorry. This must have been a major blow to you.

No, it was just the cost of wanting new technology when it was in its
infancy....no oversampling, intolerance to surface errors, etc.

Early color TVs sucked and cost about $3000 2007 dollars. But as they
evolved, they got better... it took about 15 years, too.


Hey Eduardo, how about that link to the new chip set?

There is plenty of data if you happen to be an investor in iBiquity. On the
other had, there is no data about a more expensive Samsung chip and
considerable data on it being smaller, having lower power consumption and
being much less expensive than the current short production run chips. I
don't think you need to be told to go Google it....

In article ,
"David Eduardo" wrote:

"Telamon" wrote in message
...
In article ,
"David Eduardo" wrote:

"Steve" wrote in message
ps.com...
On Sep 25, 10:43 am, "David Eduardo" wrote:

The worst thing you can do when debuting a new technology is
give crap to the early adopters (who tend to spread the
word).

My first CD player was crap.... and cost $1400.

We're very sorry. This must have been a major blow to you.

No, it was just the cost of wanting new technology when it was in
its infancy....no oversampling, intolerance to surface errors,
etc.

Early color TVs sucked and cost about $3000 2007 dollars. But as
they evolved, they got better... it took about 15 years, too.


Hey Eduardo, how about that link to the new chip set?

There is plenty of data if you happen to be an investor in iBiquity.
On the other had, there is no data about a more expensive Samsung
chip and considerable data on it being smaller, having lower power
consumption and being much less expensive than the current short
production run chips. I don't think you need to be told to go Google
it....

Wow, you really know how to blow it out your butt.

I've been to and posted the link to the Semi manufacture press news
link. Semi manufactures usually don't keep progress on new product
development since they like to show off their new products. That's what
the link is for, press releases about new product development. No press
releases mean no development.

New product is expensive until large quantities are sold so the
development cost is amortized over larger numbers of the devices.

--
Telamon
Ventura, California

On Sep 25, 10:14 pm, "David Eduardo" wrote:
"Telamon" wrote in message

...





In article ,
"David Eduardo" wrote:

"Steve" wrote in message
oups.com...
On Sep 25, 10:43 am, "David Eduardo" wrote:

The worst thing you can do when debuting a new technology is give
crap
to the early adopters (who tend to spread the word).

My first CD player was crap.... and cost $1400.

We're very sorry. This must have been a major blow to you.

No, it was just the cost of wanting new technology when it was in its
infancy....no oversampling, intolerance to surface errors, etc.

Early color TVs sucked and cost about $3000 2007 dollars. But as they
evolved, they got better... it took about 15 years, too.

Hey Eduardo, how about that link to the new chip set?

There is plenty of data if you happen to be an investor in iBiquity. On the
other had, there is no data about a more expensive Samsung chip and
considerable data on it being smaller, having lower power consumption and
being much less expensive than the current short production run chips. I
don't think you need to be told to go Google it....- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Actually, according to Samsung it's much more expensive.