Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Brenda Ann wrote: "David Eduardo" wrote in message ... In each market area, all listening to any radio station is recorded by listeners as is the instruction in the Arbitron diary. Commercial or non-commercial, local or not, internet or off air, satellite or terrestrial. All is recorded and processed. If there is any significant listening to out of market stations it is recorded. WRONG. Arbitron does NOT log "ALL LISTENING". They log a small percentage of listening, and profess to know what all the rest are doing Yes. Same way that TV Nielsen Ratings work. Statistics science has shown you don't need to record everybody..... you can record a small sample & still get an accurate result of how the group as a whole thinks. While it's true such a process won't record any amount below ~0.1 percent of the group, let's face it.... nobody cares about such small tiny insignificant numbers. |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Oct 1, 2:48 am, wrote:
Brenda Ann wrote: "David Eduardo" wrote in message t... In each market area, all listening to any radio station is recorded by listeners as is the instruction in the Arbitron diary. Commercial or non-commercial, local or not, internet or off air, satellite or terrestrial. All is recorded and processed. If there is any significant listening to out of market stations it is recorded. WRONG. Arbitron does NOT log "ALL LISTENING". They log a small percentage of listening, and profess to know what all the rest are doing Yes. Same way that TV Nielsen Ratings work. Statistics science has shown you don't need to record everybody..... you can record a small sample & still get an accurate result of how the group as a whole thinks. - While it's true such a process won't record any amount below - ~0.1 percent of the group, let's face it.... nobody cares about - such small tiny insignificant numbers. SFTV, IMHO - The majority of the people who read and post here are in that Group of People (DXers) that you just said (wrote) "nobody cares about such small tiny insignificant numbers." Are You Related To d'Eduardo ? Individual People are Human Beings - Not Quantifiable Numbers. 'feeling' so tiny and insignificant right now ~ RHF |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "RHF" wrote in message ups.com... On Oct 1, 2:48 am, wrote: Brenda Ann wrote: "David Eduardo" wrote in message t... In each market area, all listening to any radio station is recorded by listeners as is the instruction in the Arbitron diary. Commercial or non-commercial, local or not, internet or off air, satellite or terrestrial. All is recorded and processed. If there is any significant listening to out of market stations it is recorded. WRONG. Arbitron does NOT log "ALL LISTENING". They log a small percentage of listening, and profess to know what all the rest are doing Yes. Same way that TV Nielsen Ratings work. Statistics science has shown you don't need to record everybody..... you can record a small sample & still get an accurate result of how the group as a whole thinks. - While it's true such a process won't record any amount below - ~0.1 percent of the group, let's face it.... nobody cares about - such small tiny insignificant numbers. Actually, it records 0.0 shares based on perhaps one diary mention; the data is there but all it shows is that in a statistical sample, there is next to nothing for that particular station. 0 times 0 is 0. |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Oct 1, 10:59 am, "David Eduardo" wrote:
"RHF" wrote in message ups.com... On Oct 1, 2:48 am, wrote: Brenda Ann wrote: "David Eduardo" wrote in message t... In each market area, all listening to any radio station is recorded by listeners as is the instruction in the Arbitron diary. Commercial or non-commercial, local or not, internet or off air, satellite or terrestrial. All is recorded and processed. If there is any significant listening to out of market stations it is recorded. WRONG. Arbitron does NOT log "ALL LISTENING". They log a small percentage of listening, and profess to know what all the rest are doing Yes. Same way that TV Nielsen Ratings work. Statistics science has shown you don't need to record everybody..... you can record a small sample & still get an accurate result of how the group as a whole thinks. - While it's true such a process won't record any amount below - ~0.1 percent of the group, let's face it.... nobody cares about - such small tiny insignificant numbers. Actually, it records 0.0 shares based on perhaps one diary mention; the data is there but all it shows is that in a statistical sample, there is next to nothing for that particular station. 0 times 0 is 0.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - d'Eduardo, I 'feel' we are not Communicating on the same level. { Using the same set of Personal Values. } I am not a 'share'. - - - I don't believe that anyone here considers themselves to be a 'share'. {except you} I am not a 'statistical sample'. - - - I don't believe that anyone here considers themselves to be a 'statistical sample'. {except you} I am not a 'number' - - - I don't believe that anyone here considers themselves to be a 'number'. {except you} I AM AN AVID RADIO LISTENER [.] -and- I BELIEVE EVERYONE HERE IS AN AVID RADIO LISTENER ! {EXCEPT YOU} The Reality of IBOC Sucks : AM/MW "HD" Radio is 'by-design' Engineered to Interfer with the two Adjacent AM/MW Radio Channels at 10 kHz. http://electronicdesign.com/Files/29.../Figure_02.gif I Ask Myself : What IBOC ? All I See Is The Blinking Blue Light ! ~ RHF In That Distant Land* Where IBOC Fears To Go : Life Exists and Radio Listeners Live Beyond the 10mv/m Contour. * Twain Harte, CA -USA- |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
WTT.. Radio Shack 2039 Scanner. NEW TEKK DATA Radio. FOR Green Military radio. OR 2 mtr HT | Swap |