Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
David Eduardo wrote:
"Steve" wrote in message ups.com... On Sep 26, 11:59 am, "David Eduardo" wrote: "Steve" wrote in message ups.com... On Sep 26, 11:11 am, "David Eduardo" wrote: So far as I'm concerned it doesn't matter at all. But I wonder if this at least partially explains the enormous chip on your shoulder and your persistent need to somehow 'prove yourself''. Why would building a #1 station in a market with 40 signals at age 18 require proving myself... again? It's your behavior, so you tell me. Perhaps you worked with people who didn't have sufficient appreciation of what you'd accomplished. Maybe they tried to use your lack of formal education against you in some petty, political way. Who knows? I sure don't. This isolated piece of your personal history could have been subtly relevant on many occasions, the cumulative effect being the chip you now have on your shoulder. That "chip" is a love of broadcasting, something DXers, in some significant proportion, seem to have lost. How dare you. The loss of love of Broadcasting by DXers is something that is, itself, a very late development. Most DXers didn't lose the love of broadcasting, until they were openly discounted, disrepected, and held in open contempt by broadcasters. Something broadcasters, themselves, have been doing for far more than the handful of years that DXers have been responding with disdain to. Broadcasters have been spitting in the face of DXers for at least 30 years that I can recall. Sometimes, one on one. Sometimes, as Mark Byford did at BBCWS, in mass media presentations, and in direct messages on his own radio stations. Imagine the gall of a shortwave broadcaster telling his listeners, en masse, that his programming was intended for 'decision makers and opinion formers' and would be made preferentially available to them, while eliminating service to hundreds of millions of listeners at a stroke, because they simply weren't elite enough. We're not talking about local radio, here. We're talking about a shortwave broadcaster. DX by design. With more than 120 million listeners worldwide. Told in no uncertain terms that they were of no importance, and not worth being served. You think that may have something to do with loss of passion for broadcasting? It sure turned my radio dial in a hurry. I've worked at radio stations where the engineers were not permitted to respond to listener reception reports because, and this is a quote by the GM, "They're not worth the postage." This was in 1977. He's by far not exclusive in my work experience. Something you've demonstrated for some months here, yourself. You think that may have something to do with DXer disdain? DXers have been enthusiasts for broadcasting until only a few years ago. They've stood by those who echo your sentiments for more than 20 years while being openly and personally dissed by Broadcasting. How dare you display the temerity to imply that the problem is with DXers. Look within your own ranks. Why the hell would ANYONE remain loyal to an industry which speaks of them the way Broadcasting speaks of Dx...the way YOU speak of DX. Fans don't leave without cause, David. Enthusiasm doesn't die. It's murdered. The first slap in the face came from broadcaster themselves. Look in your own house before you dare point a finger at your listeners. And Broadcasting has been holding that smoking gun for decades. YOU have pulled the trigger here, more times than I can count...in this thread alone. How dare you. You arrogant son of a bitch. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|