On Sun, 30 Sep 2007 02:38:36 -0700, SFTV_troy
wrote:


Don Pearce wrote:

For a really good selection that lets you compare rates, try here
http://www.tuner2.com/



All right. How do I do an advanced search, so I can narrow my
selection to just 16 kbit/s stations? (As I routinately do on
shoutcast.com).

Dunno, sorry. Just browse the list and see what takes your fancy. I
don't think it is intended as a technical resource, but as
entertainment.

d

--
Pearce Consulting
http://www.pearce.uk.com

Don Pearce wrote:
On Sun, 30 Sep 2007 02:38:36 -0700, SFTV_troy
Don Pearce wrote:

For a really good selection that lets you compare rates, try here
http://www.tuner2.com/

All right. How do I do an advanced search, so I can narrow my
selection to just 16 kbit/s stations? (As I routinately do on
shoutcast.com).

Dunno, sorry. Just browse the list and see what takes your fancy. I
don't think it is intended as a technical resource, but as
entertainment.


Well yeah, but even shoutcast & live365 have advanced search
functions, and they are for entertainment too. It would be impossible
to scan through 10,000 stations just to find the ones you like.
(Which is why they have the advanced search.)

I don't think I'll be using tuner2 any time soon. Not user-friendly.

On Sun, 30 Sep 2007 03:54:04 -0700, wrote:


Don Pearce wrote:
On Sun, 30 Sep 2007 02:38:36 -0700, SFTV_troy
Don Pearce wrote:

For a really good selection that lets you compare rates, try here
http://www.tuner2.com/

All right. How do I do an advanced search, so I can narrow my
selection to just 16 kbit/s stations? (As I routinately do on
shoutcast.com).

Dunno, sorry. Just browse the list and see what takes your fancy. I
don't think it is intended as a technical resource, but as
entertainment.


Well yeah, but even shoutcast & live365 have advanced search
functions, and they are for entertainment too. It would be impossible
to scan through 10,000 stations just to find the ones you like.
(Which is why they have the advanced search.)

I don't think I'll be using tuner2 any time soon. Not user-friendly.

Let 'em know. I'm sure they are up for making things better. It is too
good a resource to just dismiss that way.

d

--
Pearce Consulting
http://www.pearce.uk.com

On Sep 30, 4:25 am, (Don Pearce) wrote:
On Sun, 30 Sep 2007 02:38:36 -0700, SFTV_troy
wrote:



Don Pearce wrote:

For a really good selection that lets you compare rates, try here
http://www.tuner2.com/

All right. How do I do an advanced search, so I can narrow my
selection to just 16 kbit/s stations? (As I routinately do on
shoutcast.com).

Dunno, sorry. Just browse the list and see what takes your fancy. I
don't think it is intended as a technical resource, but as
entertainment.

d

--
Pearce Consultinghttp://www.pearce.uk.com

It's becoming painfully bloody OBVIOUS that we have a foreign OP who
has the British status quo confused with a purely AMERICAN concept,
hybrid digital (Britain has absolute stark, raving NIL). Nobody else
in the world has bothered much with a halfway approach to digital
radio--only the US..

Steven wrote:
On Sun, 30 Sep 2007 02:38:36 -0700, SFTV_troy

All right. How do I do an advanced search, so I can narrow my
selection to just 16 kbit/s stations? (As I routinately do on
shoutcast.com).

It's becoming painfully bloody OBVIOUS that we have a foreign OP who
has the British status quo confused with a purely AMERICAN concept,
hybrid digital (Britain has absolute stark, raving NIL).

I'm not confused. I am aware that DAB sits on its own separate band.



Nobody else in the world has bothered much with
a halfway approach to digital radio--only the US..

Not true. The U.S. is not the only place to use IBOC. The E.U. also
uses IBOC for shortwave, AM, and (soon) FM.

(By the way, why do europeans hate america so much? What did we do to
you to create such animosity?)

wrote ...
(By the way, why do europeans hate america so much?
What did we do to you to create such animosity?)

It comes and goes. Look up the recent French presidential
elections, etc.