Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sep 30, 5:58 pm, Steve wrote:
On Sep 30, 6:50 pm, SFTV_troy wrote: I've learned that not all technologies win; Just because YOU want to see Wireless Internet sending music to people's cars, doesn't mean it will succeed. CONSUMERS decide, not us..... The thing is, in this case the choice is literally a no brainer. Consumers will be able to decide between HD radio, which lets them hear a few big local broadcasters delivering generic programming vs the thousands of stations accessible via the internet, bundled no doubt with email, web access, the whole shebang.... Sounds complicated. History shows consumers don't like complicated things (like how to program the blinking clock on their VCRs). Terrestrial radio offers the ease of just "turning the knob". That's it. Even a mental midget can do it. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
AM/MW "HD" (IBOC) Radio is a Killer Application - { It Kills the Host Analog AM/MW Radio } | Shortwave | |||
FS Killer Computer Controller Radio | Scanner | |||
killer bee linear | Shortwave | |||
Radio had no warnings of killer waves | Broadcasting | |||
Radio had no warnings of killer waves | Shortwave |