Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#21
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Oct 3, 8:08 am, Steve wrote:
On Oct 3, 8:53 am, "Richard Crowley" wrote: THIS DISCUSSION IS OFF-TOPIC FOR REC.AUDIO.TECH (AND REC.AUDIO.CAR, FOR THAT MATTER) PLEASE DROP REC.AUDIO.TECH FROM THIS DISCUSSION Please drop rec.radio.shortwave as well. I don't see how a discussion about AM radio could be offtopic in a Radio Tech group or a Car Audio group. |
#22
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"SFTV_troy" wrote ...
I don't see how a discussion about AM radio could be offtopic in a Radio Tech group or a Car Audio group. Then you apparently don't understand the difference between "radio" and "audio". Even more reason why you should cease cross-posting. You exhibit the kind of behavior that gives Google Groups a bad reputation. People are starting to automatically filter out all postings from Google Groups as *noise*. Don't spoil it for everyone. |
#23
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article . com,
SFTV_troy wrote: On Oct 3, 8:08 am, Steve wrote: On Oct 3, 8:53 am, "Richard Crowley" wrote: THIS DISCUSSION IS OFF-TOPIC FOR REC.AUDIO.TECH (AND REC.AUDIO.CAR, FOR THAT MATTER) PLEASE DROP REC.AUDIO.TECH FROM THIS DISCUSSION Please drop rec.radio.shortwave as well. I don't see how a discussion about AM radio could be offtopic in a Radio Tech group or a Car Audio group. You could make any on topic discussion off topic. Clueless posts are always off topic anywhere on Usenet. -- Telamon Ventura, California |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Nighttime AM HD Operation | Shortwave | |||
Nighttime AM HD | Shortwave | |||
Nighttime AM-HD now published in Federal Register ! | Shortwave | |||
Nighttime AM-HD now published in Federal Register ! | Shortwave | |||
Looks like iNiquity may get its way on nighttime AM IBOC ! | Shortwave |