On Oct 2, 9:54?am, "David Eduardo" wrote:
wrote in message

ups.com...

On Oct 2, 6:57?am, wrote:
I looked on arbitron.com, but they don't share that info with the
public.

Anybody know?

Why do you want to know - say "Hi" to Struble for me!

Only subscribers get this data. It is not licensed only for sales and
programming purposes. Struble does not work for Arbitron.

"News/Talk/Sports:Radio's Last Bastion"

"Music FMs of any flavor are utterly screwed... Right now -- while FMs
are losing the music audience to new media -- satellite radio is
offering more News/Talk/Sports programming than we can fit on AM
radio..."

http://ftp.media.radcity.net/ZMST/daily/IS031005.htm

Struble works for the FCC.

On Oct 2, 7:42 pm, wrote:
On Oct 2, 9:54?am, "David Eduardo" wrote:

wrote in message

oups.com...

On Oct 2, 6:57?am, wrote:
I looked on arbitron.com, but they don't share that info with the
public.

Anybody know?

Why do you want to know - say "Hi" to Struble for me!

Only subscribers get this data. It is not licensed only for sales and
programming purposes. Struble does not work for Arbitron.

"News/Talk/Sports:Radio's Last Bastion"

"Music FMs of any flavor are utterly screwed... Right now -- while FMs
are losing the music audience to new media -- satellite radio is
offering more News/Talk/Sports programming than we can fit on AM
radio..."

- http://ftp.media.radcity.net/ZMST/daily/IS031005.htm

Struble works for the FCC.

PR,

After Reading the Link/URL and Thinking About It
-IF- Most of the AM/MW Radio Stations that I like to
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.r...d4b1b90e57ec26
Listen-To when to had a simulcast on the FM Radio Band
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Simulcast
-or- Transitioned to the FM Band : I could most likely hear
then all better both Day and Night up here beyond the
10mv/m Contour in Twain Harte, CA.

KSFO 560 kHz
KMJ 580 kHz
KSTE 650 kHz
KCBS 740 kHz
KGO 810 kHz
KMPH 840 kHz
KVIN 920 kHz
KNEW 910 kHz
KQKE 960 kHz
KSRO 1350 kHz
KFBK 1530 kHz

Even more reason to convert the old Analog TV Channels
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Very_high_frequency
5 and 6 over to an Expanded FM Radio Band {76-88 MHz}
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FM_radio
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FM_broadcast_band
http://www.cs.iit.edu/~wan/lecture2.pdf

~ RHF

On Oct 3, 4:47 am, RHF wrote:

Even more reason to convert the old Analog TV http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Very_high_frequency
5 and 6 over to an Expanded FM Radio Band



What the hell are you talking about? Channels 5 and 6 are *already
occupied* by ATSC DTV channels. I routinely watch channel 6 out of
Philadelphia, and you are NOT going to take it away from me. TV is
more important than some fm station.

(Besides the TV was there *first* and has a right to stay there.)

It's bad enough we lost UHF channels 51 and up. Now you want the FCC
to take away channels 5-6 too? **** that idea.

On Oct 3, 4:40 am, wrote:
On Oct 3, 4:47 am, RHF wrote:



Even more reason to convert the old Analog TVhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Very_high_frequency
5 and 6 over to an Expanded FM Radio Band

What the hell are you talking about? Channels 5 and 6 are *already
occupied* by ATSC DTV channels. I routinely watch channel 6 out of
Philadelphia, and you are NOT going to take it away from me. TV is
more important than some fm station.

(Besides the TV was there *first* and has a right to stay there.)

It's bad enough we lost UHF channels 51 and up. Now you want the FCC
to take away channels 5-6 too? **** that idea.

SFTV - Open Mouth Insert Foot. ~ RHF

On Oct 3, 7:40 am, wrote:
On Oct 3, 4:47 am, RHF wrote:



Even more reason to convert the old Analog TVhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Very_high_frequency
5 and 6 over to an Expanded FM Radio Band

What the hell are you talking about? Channels 5 and 6 are *already
occupied* by ATSC DTV channels. I routinely watch channel 6 out of
Philadelphia, and you are NOT going to take it away from me. TV is
more important than some fm station.

(Besides the TV was there *first* and has a right to stay there.)

It's bad enough we lost UHF channels 51 and up. Now you want the FCC
to take away channels 5-6 too? **** that idea.

Hmmm. Sounds like you don't like the idea of someone going in and
messing up that particular piece of spectrum, huh?

Well, now you know how WE feel. Take it and suck on it!

Steve wrote:
On Oct 3, 7:40 am, wrote:
On Oct 3, 4:47 am, RHF wrote:



Even more reason to convert the old Analog TVhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Very_high_frequency
5 and 6 over to an Expanded FM Radio Band

It's bad enough we lost UHF channels 51 and up. Now you want
the FCC to take away channels 5-6 too? **** that idea.

Hmmm. Sounds like you don't like the idea of someone going in and
messing up that particular piece of spectrum, huh?


Not the same. The FCC's decision to convert from analog-to-digital on
the AM band does Not make the bandwidth any smaller. It's still the
same size as always (530-1710).

But deleting channels 5-6 *does* shrink the bandwidth for television
(and also puts several stations across the nation out-of-business).

On Oct 3, 4:40 am, wrote:
On Oct 3, 4:47 am, RHF wrote:



Even more reason to convert the old Analog TVhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Very_high_frequency
5 and 6 over to an Expanded FM Radio Band

What the hell are you talking about? Channels 5 and 6 are *already
occupied* by ATSC DTV channels. I routinely watch channel 6 out of
Philadelphia, and you are NOT going to take it away from me. TV is
more important than some fm station.

(Besides the TV was there *first* and has a right to stay there.)

- It's bad enough we lost UHF channels 51 and up.
- Now you want the FCC to take away channels 5-6 too?
- **** that idea.

* Having Intercourse with an Idea -is- a Real Mind F*ck !

SFTV - Ever Heard of the Greater Good ? ~ RHF
-

Converting the old Analog TV Channels 5 and 6 over to an
Expanded FM Radio Band {76-88 MHz} and having all the
'new' FM Broadcasters start out as 50% Analog/ 50% Digital
would insure the transition to FM Digital Radio and help to
clear-out the AM/MW Radio Band for a new Band Plan :
Fewer Radio Stations; Wider Channel Spacing; More Uniform
Power Output.

A small loss for TV a Greater Good for FM Digital Radio
Broadcasting and the Future of Over-the-Air Radio.

SFTV -aka- "Hybrid Digital" Man We Need Your Support !

In article om,
wrote:

On Oct 3, 4:47 am, RHF wrote:

Even more reason to convert the old Analog TV
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Very_high_frequency
5 and 6 over to an Expanded FM Radio Band



What the hell are you talking about? Channels 5 and 6 are *already
occupied* by ATSC DTV channels. I routinely watch channel 6 out of
Philadelphia, and you are NOT going to take it away from me. TV is
more important than some fm station.

(Besides the TV was there *first* and has a right to stay there.)

It's bad enough we lost UHF channels 51 and up. Now you want the FCC
to take away channels 5-6 too? **** that idea.

You think we all live where you do bozo?

--
Telamon
Ventura, California