Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Brenda Ann wrote: "David Eduardo" wrote in message ... Then why have news talk stations all over the US moved totally to FM or are transitioning with simulcasts? The answer is that they get a big increase in 25-54 listeners when on FM, as the under-55 crowd likes the programming, but hates the sound quality. When they get it on FM, they listen. I'm sure glad that the radio industry can afford to just toss away the largest segment of the population, with the most disposable income Advertising to people over 45 is a waste. They are "set in their ways" and no amount of advertising is going to make them switch from Crest to Colgate. Advertising to someone over 45 will Not persuade them to switch brands. It's a waste of money. |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Oct 4, 10:13?am, SFTV_troy wrote:
Brenda Ann wrote: "David Eduardo" wrote in message ... Then why have news talk stations all over the US moved totally to FM or are transitioning with simulcasts? The answer is that they get a big increase in 25-54 listeners when on FM, as the under-55 crowd likes the programming, but hates the sound quality. When they get it on FM, they listen. I'm sure glad that the radio industry can afford to just toss away the largest segment of the population, with the most disposable income Advertising to people over 45 is a waste. They are "set in their ways" and no amount of advertising is going to make them switch from Crest to Colgate. Advertising to someone over 45 will Not persuade them to switch brands. It's a waste of money. Good luck advertising to Gen Y, as they have shunned terrestrial radio in favor of iPods, cell phones, Satellite Radio, etc... |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "IBOCcrock" wrote in message oups.com... On Oct 4, 10:13?am, SFTV_troy wrote: Brenda Ann wrote: "David Eduardo" wrote in message ... Then why have news talk stations all over the US moved totally to FM or are transitioning with simulcasts? The answer is that they get a big increase in 25-54 listeners when on FM, as the under-55 crowd likes the programming, but hates the sound quality. When they get it on FM, they listen. I'm sure glad that the radio industry can afford to just toss away the largest segment of the population, with the most disposable income Advertising to people over 45 is a waste. They are "set in their ways" and no amount of advertising is going to make them switch from Crest to Colgate. Advertising to someone over 45 will Not persuade them to switch brands. It's a waste of money. Good luck advertising to Gen Y, as they have shunned terrestrial radio in favor of iPods, cell phones, Satellite Radio, etc... 45-50 year olds are the ones you sell new whizbang TV's, cars, refrigerators, etc. to. Not toothpaste. And BTW.. me, I'm always trying different brands of toothpaste, and even some of the new flavors of soda and such. |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article om,
SFTV_troy wrote: Brenda Ann wrote: "David Eduardo" wrote in message ... Then why have news talk stations all over the US moved totally to FM or are transitioning with simulcasts? The answer is that they get a big increase in 25-54 listeners when on FM, as the under-55 crowd likes the programming, but hates the sound quality. When they get it on FM, they listen. I'm sure glad that the radio industry can afford to just toss away the largest segment of the population, with the most disposable income Advertising to people over 45 is a waste. They are "set in their ways" and no amount of advertising is going to make them switch from Crest to Colgate. Advertising to someone over 45 will Not persuade them to switch brands. It's a waste of money. Your posts are so convincing. -- Telamon Ventura, California |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|