Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Oct 6, 10:27 pm, "David Eduardo" wrote:
"Telamon" wrote in message ... I am telling you the radio broadcast industry opinion, the opinion of the major broadcasters who invested in iBiquity, the NAB, the FCC and many others. All of us are concerned with the approaching obsolescence of AM... even investors, as each AM decline will force potential write-downs of the asset values of the goodwill of each AM. You do not speak for the industry. You speak for yourself. This is your opinion Mr. Pretender. The opinion of the need to make both AM and FM digital within the current allocations is something stated by all the entities I mentioned. Okay. Fine. They've "stated" it. Wow. The general feeling is that a separate AM solution would fail and AM would fail with it, Okay. Fine. They have a "feeling". Big deal. as no manufacturers would back a separate solution, while HD offered a piggy back ride to AM into digital. A piggy back ride into oblivion is hardly going to help the situation. That's the FCC view in its rulings, the NAB position paper and the reason a half-dozen major broadcasters invested in iBiquity to give it some seed capital. They invested in iNiquity in order to make money...in order to make a lot of money at the expense of the listening public, the idea being that after AM fails they'll have made their money and all will be well. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|