Apparently the FCC says flamethrowers are expected to serve beyond
their groundwave contours.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clear_channel

On Oct 1, 9:20 am, David wrote:

Apparently the FCC says flamethrowers are expected to
serve beyond their groundwave contours.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clear_channel



It doesn't say that. It says: "In 1980, the FCC voted to limit the
protection for the twenty-five clear channel stations to a 750 mile
radius around the transmitter."

It says NOTHING about clearchannels *having* to send out that far.

On Oct 1, 7:20 am, David wrote:
-
- Apparently the FCC says flamethrowers are expected
- to serve beyond their groundwave contours.
-
- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clear_channel

1 OCT 2007 2 AM PDT - Twain Harte, CA -USA-
http://www.ac6v.com/clearam.htm

KMJ 580 kHz - Fresno, CA @ S9+20dB
KFI 640 kHz - Los Angeles, CA @ S9+20dB
KTNN 660 kHz - Window Rock, AZ @ S9+10dB
KNBR 680 kHz - San Francisco, CA @ S9+30dB
XETRA 690 kHz - Tijuana, BNC @ S9+10dB
KCBS 740 kHz - San Francisco, CA @ S9+40dB
KKOH 780 kHz - Reno, NV @ S9+20dB
KGO 810 kHz - San Francisco, CA @ S9+10dB
850 KOA 850 kHz - Denver, CO @ S9+10dB
KOMO 1000 kHz - Seattle, WA @ S9+20dB
KNX 1070 kHz - Los Angeles, CA @ S9+10dB
KFAX 1100 kHz - San Francisco, CA @ S9+20dB
KSL 1160 kHz - Salt Lake City, UT @ S9+20dB
KEX 1190 kHz - Portland, OR @ S9+10dB
KFBK 1530 kHz Sacramento, CA @ S9+30dB

Note - "Radio Locator: gives the Day and Night Coverage
Maps for most of these AM/MW Radio Stations.
http://www.radio-locator.com/

More AM/MW and FM Radio Information -Sources-

* Mondo Times™ - The Worldwide Media Guide
http://www.mondotimes.com/

* RadioTime™ the RadioGuide™
http://radiotime.com/about-us.aspx

* Find Radio™ Stations
http://www.findradio.us/

RHF's Radio Shack in Twain Harte, California -USA-
SHACK INFO = http://tinyurl.com/2skmxm
Shortwave Radio / Receiver and SWL Antenna Info
.
enjoy listening to your radios ~ RHF
.

On Oct 1, 10:21 am, wrote:
On Oct 1, 9:20 am, David wrote:



Apparently the FCC says flamethrowers are expected to
serve beyond their groundwave contours.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clear_channel

It doesn't say that. It says: "In 1980, the FCC voted to limit the
protection for the twenty-five clear channel stations to a 750 mile
radius around the transmitter."

It says NOTHING about clearchannels *having* to send out that far.

Do you have a life?

On Mon, 01 Oct 2007 09:46:53 -0700, IBOCcrock
wrote:

On Oct 1, 10:21 am, wrote:
On Oct 1, 9:20 am, David wrote:



Apparently the FCC says flamethrowers are expected to
serve beyond their groundwave contours.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clear_channel

It doesn't say that. It says: "In 1980, the FCC voted to limit the
protection for the twenty-five clear channel stations to a 750 mile
radius around the transmitter."

It says NOTHING about clearchannels *having* to send out that far.

Do you have a life?

it would seem he does why do you ask?

"one useless man is disgrace 2 become a law firm 3 or more become a congress"
adams

woger you are a Congress all in your own head

http://kb9rqz.bravejournal.com/

and get ou the newly recovered KB9RQZ.blogspot.com as well

G

--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

On Oct 1, 9:46 am, IBOCcrock wrote:
On Oct 1, 10:21 am, wrote:

On Oct 1, 9:20 am, David wrote:

Apparently the FCC says flamethrowers are expected to
serve beyond their groundwave contours.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clear_channel

It doesn't say that. It says: "In 1980, the FCC voted to limit the
protection for the twenty-five clear channel stations to a 750 mile
radius around the transmitter."

It says NOTHING about clearchannels *having* to send out that far.

- Do you have a life?

SFTV is our new 'superhero' "Hybrid Digital" Man. ~ RHF

--
William Smith
Indiana
IC-746, FRG-100
1500 foot longwire

"IBOCcrock" wrote in message
ups.com...
On Oct 1, 10:21 am, wrote:
On Oct 1, 9:20 am, David wrote:



Apparently the FCC says flamethrowers are expected to
serve beyond their groundwave contours.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clear_channel

It doesn't say that. It says: "In 1980, the FCC voted to limit the
protection for the twenty-five clear channel stations to a 750 mile
radius around the transmitter."

It says NOTHING about clearchannels *having* to send out that far.

Do you have a life?


Doubtful that he does, I hope he enjoys his over priced ****ty HD Radio

"David" wrote in message
...
On Mon, 01 Oct 2007 06:20:01 -0800, David wrote:

Apparently the FCC says flamethrowers are expected to serve beyond
their groundwave contours.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clear_channel

Dwardo has no comment on this?

I don't have enough lives to correct everything I find wrong with Wikipedia.

"David" wrote in message
...
On Mon, 01 Oct 2007 06:20:01 -0800, David wrote:

Apparently the FCC says flamethrowers are expected to serve beyond
their groundwave contours.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clear_channel

Dwardo has no comment on this?

There is nothing in part 73 of the rules about different service
requirements for clear channel stations, In fact, they must conform to local
ascertainment and interests requirements just like a 1 kw graveyarder.

The article is very wrong on a number of things: many of the cities of
license are wrong, like XEEP and XEB, for example (Both Mexico, DF, Mexico)
and Clear Channel, the company, was not formed to buy a clear channel
station... that was a later acquisition, and the com´pany then changed name
to match it... the first one was an FM, in fact. They only bought WOAI when
they had the money to take on the losses of WOAI, which was in dire straits
then.

"David" wrote in message
news
On Mon, 01 Oct 2007 07:21:54 -0700, wrote:

On Oct 1, 9:20 am, David wrote:

Apparently the FCC says flamethrowers are expected to
serve beyond their groundwave contours.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clear_channel



It doesn't say that. It says: "In 1980, the FCC voted to limit the
protection for the twenty-five clear channel stations to a 750 mile
radius around the transmitter."

It says NOTHING about clearchannels *having* to send out that far.


That's exactly what it says. And it calls it secondary SERVICE. That
is the opposite of ignoring because they can't be monetized.

The service defined here is referent to signal, not programming. There is no
requirement to serve skywave listeners, or listeners in a secondary contour,
however it is defined.