LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #5   Report Post  
Old October 11th 07, 01:25 AM posted to rec.radio.shortwave
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 285
Default A "new" technique for measuring differential mode to common conversion.

On Oct 11, 12:59 am, wrote:
On Oct 9, 10:25 pm, wrote:



On Oct 10, 2:17 am, "Al" wrote:


wrote in message


roups.com...


Regulars here may have followed my efforts to deal with noise
generated within
my own home.
Terry


Your posts on this subject and others similar to it have been excellent. I,
and I'm sure others, appreciate the time and work you put into these
subjects and for making this information available.


Thank you.


Al KA5JGV
San Antonio, TX


I also want to say thank you for all your effort and the sharing of
this information. I think a low RF noise enviornment is more
important than the receiver used, much like a poor antenna will make a
$2000 radio perform almost no better than a $200 one.


For a little over a year I had an AOR7030+ to store for a friend.
A great receiver with a great selection of filters, but a PITA menu
system.
I also own a R390 and had a Drake R8B for a few months.

At my location, even after all my noise mitigation efforts, the 3
great receivers
were not significantly better at digging out the weak one. True the
filters and
superior front end, lower phase noise and better detectors made
listening
a lot easier and more fun, but at the end of the day my R2000 could
hear
better then99% of what the other three could.

Even my lowly DX398 could hear about 95% of what the best could.

Don't get me wrong, as soon as I can I will upgrade to a R8B and with
luck
a 7030+. SDR's are improving so fast that may divert me, but I think I
will
stick with conventional for a while longer.

The R2000 is rated by Sherwood labs as having ~-127dBm sensitivity.
The best I have seen the noise floor around here was during an ice
storm 14 years ago when I had 2 days of SW bliss. The noise floor
was around -110. So even then I had 17 dB of gain that I couldn't use.

Of course the better radios are much better at picking one signal in
a
crowded situation. The R2000 suffers from pretty poor close signal
separation. For 2 signals of roughly the same strength it isn't an
issue,
but when the unwanted signal is more then about 3 times strong as
the desired signal, the R2000 has very tough time picking it out.

The R8B and 7020+ are great. The R390 is better. But the R390 is no
fun to rapidly tune from one frequency to a very different frequency
in
a hurry.

Terry




 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
What Does KB9RQZ's "English" and A Democrat's Idea of Birth Control Have In Common...?!?! [email protected] Policy 0 December 6th 06 11:45 AM
"meltdown in progress"..."is amy fireproof"...The Actions Of A "Man" With Three College Degrees? K4YZ Policy 6 August 28th 06 11:11 PM
MFJ Tuner "Current Balun" conversion. [email protected] Antenna 20 April 25th 06 10:04 PM
For Shortwave Listening (SWL) here is a "Simpler" Horizontal Loop Antenna in the Attic using common TV type Parts RHF Shortwave 1 November 24th 05 12:33 AM
A "single conversion" question Larry Shortwave 24 November 15th 05 04:19 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:54 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017