OT, I'll be Damned
 

In article ,
David wrote:

On Tue, 23 Oct 2007 22:19:31 -0700, Ross Archer
wrote:


That's not true. I posted MANY independent sources, which you refuse
to read because you enjoy your ignorance.
Remain ignorant. I am through with such a willfully ignorant
bubblehead.


You are willfully ignorant. I am done with you.

C'mon, the guy volunteered for his lobotomy, give him SOME credit.

Don't confuse me with yourself who opted for the chemical lobotomy.

--
Telamon
Ventura, California

OT, I'll be Damned
 

In article .com,
Ross Archer wrote:

On Oct 21, 1:53 am, RHF wrote:
On Oct 20, 11:34 pm, Ross Archer wrote:

On Oct 19, 9:19 pm, Telamon

wrote:
In article . com,
Ross Archer wrote:

On Oct 13, 1:43 am, Telamon
wrote:
In article . com,
Ross Archer wrote:

On Oct 12, 2:16 am, "Burr" wrote:
Maybe I should have voted for the SOB!!!!

from CNN
-- Former U.S. Vice President Al Gore and the U.N.'s climate
change
panel
win
the 2007 Nobel Peace Prize. Details soon.

While it's certainly open to debate whether global warming falls
under
the purview of a peace prize, there's no question that once it's
decided that the prize goes for that, Albert Gore Jr. is
deserving of
it.

The idea that global warming is liberal bias is preposterous.
Global
warming is occurring, and the majority of that warming is
anthropogenic, and this is the consensus of climate scientists.
None
of this is controversial in scientific circles, or at least no
more
controversial than most generally-accepted theories.

First off there is no proof that man is responsible for climate
change.

There is *overwhelming* scientific evidence to this effect. Where
have you been?

I'm sorry for being so blunt, but your statement is completely
contrary to fact.

You don't know what you are talking about. There is no evidence. Get a
clue, mans contribution is insignificant compared to the processes in
nature that add and subtract the CO2 levels.

--
Telamon
Ventura, California

There is conclusive
evidence.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scienti...climate_change

- You can choose to ignore what science says,
- but you cannot claim that scientific opinion
- says something other than what it does.
- Humans are causing the majority of recent warming.
- That is the state of current best scientific knowledge.
- This is not opinion. It is documented fact.

RA - DUH ! - Scientific 'Opinion(s)' is NOT
Indisputable Incontrivertable Scientific Fact [.]

Documenting a Group of Like 'Opinions'
Does Not Make These 'Opinions' Facts.

and thems is the facts ~ rhf
.


Scientific opinion = what the available facts and evidence indicates
after the application of REASON.

What, in the absence of absolute proof, would you use to establish
what's true? Reading tea leaves? Using divining rods?
Praying to the Pink Sky Unicorn?

Sorry, but when the majority of scientists make a statement based on
evidence and reason, it's by far the most likely to be true.

Scientific "opinion" is the closest to fact. I don't know what you're
using, but it's inferior.

Try to understand your place in this. You are being used. Do you
understand that you are being used by socialists to promote their agenda?

Look carefully at who is making these assertions. Look at the evidence
they purport supports their position. Notice they are not making their
case "scientifically" but instead make assumptions " leaps of faith
actually" and expect you to "believe" these assertions. Again, there is
no Proof according to logical, scientific method that "proves" man is
even making a significant contribution to climate change.

Look at the evidence they do not provide that man is "responsible."

Look at past climate change when man made CO2 was not a factor.

Look at what is happening currently on planets in the rest of the solar
system where man is not a factor.

Think about these subjects and don't parrot.

--
Telamon
Ventura, California

OT, I'll be Damned
 

Telamon wrote:


Try to understand your place in this. You are being used. Do you
understand that you are being used by socialists

LOL at an un-repentant Cold War relic who sees a commie under every
rock. Maybe you can dig up old 'Tail-Gunner' Joe McCarthy and explain it
to him. You may get more sympathy...

OT, I'll be Damned
 

On Wed, 24 Oct 2007 18:13:18 -0700, Telamon
wrote:


tide?

Baloney 12 feet. Try 2 to 3 feet worst case.

I'm talking about the cushion between the ocean and your lawn.

OT, I'll be Damned
 

On Wed, 24 Oct 2007 18:15:16 -0700, Telamon
wrote:

In article ,
David wrote:

On Tue, 23 Oct 2007 22:19:31 -0700, Ross Archer
wrote:


That's not true. I posted MANY independent sources, which you refuse
to read because you enjoy your ignorance.
Remain ignorant. I am through with such a willfully ignorant
bubblehead.


You are willfully ignorant. I am done with you.

C'mon, the guy volunteered for his lobotomy, give him SOME credit.

Don't confuse me with yourself who opted for the chemical lobotomy.

Huh? I don't drink.

OT, I'll be Damned
 

On Wed, 24 Oct 2007 18:30:33 -0700, Telamon
wrote:



Try to understand your place in this. You are being used. Do you
understand that you are being used by socialists to promote their agenda?

Look carefully at who is making these assertions. Look at the evidence
they purport supports their position. Notice they are not making their
case "scientifically" but instead make assumptions " leaps of faith
actually" and expect you to "believe" these assertions. Again, there is
no Proof according to logical, scientific method that "proves" man is
even making a significant contribution to climate change.

Look at the evidence they do not provide that man is "responsible."

Look at past climate change when man made CO2 was not a factor.

Look at what is happening currently on planets in the rest of the solar
system where man is not a factor.

Think about these subjects and don't parrot.

You are being used by perverted capitalists who have no agenda, other
than making money as possible and maintaining their power base (pun
intended). Personally, I think it's over, except for the lovely
chaos. You dropped the ball 30 nyears ago, when you could have done
some good.

Common Sense - The Answer To The Fear Mongering of Global Warming
 

On Wed, 24 Oct 2007 11:50:44 -0700, RHF
wrote:

On Oct 23, 10:18 pm, Ross Archer wrote:
On Oct 21, 1:53 am, RHF wrote:
- You can choose to ignore what science says,
- but you cannot claim that scientific opinion
- says something other than what it does.
- Humans are causing the majority of recent warming.
- That is the state of current best scientific knowledge.
- This is not opinion. It is documented fact.

RA - DUH ! - Scientific 'Opinion(s)' is NOT
Indisputable Incontrivertable Scientific Fact [.]

Documenting a Group of Like 'Opinions'
Does Not Make These 'Opinions' Facts.

and thems is the facts ~ rhf
.

- Scientific opinion = what the available facts and evidence indicates
- after the application of REASON.

RA - Alas It Is Still 'Opinion' -and- Not A Hard Fact [.]

- What, in the absence of absolute proof,
- would you use to establish what's true?

RA - Actual Hard Facts -and- The Truth
-not- a Collection of 'Opinions'

- Reading tea leaves?
- Using divining rods?
- Praying to the Pink Sky Unicorn?

RA - There You Go Off-the-Deep-End
-Point-of-Fact- I never suggested any of those.

- Sorry, but when the majority of scientists make a statement based
- on evidence and reason, it's by far the most likely to be true.

RA - Selective Evidence and Skewed Reasoning
Does Not Make Foregone Conclusions True.

- Scientific "opinion" is the closest to fact.
- I don't know what you're using, but it's inferior.

RA - 'Close To' a "Fact" still is NOT A FACT [.]

That's Common Sense -and- The Answer To The Fear Mongering
of Global Warming is the Understanding that Climate Change does
Exist and that We 'may-be' Loooking at a Period of Climate Change
in the Future of Mankind upon this Planet that We Call The Earth.

- -- ross-

RA - You Are Simply Entitled To Your 'Opinion'
-and- That's A Fact ~ RHF
.

Wouldn't it be prudent to prepare for the worst just in case? What
harm would it do?

Common Sense - The Answer To The Fear Mongering of Global Warming
 

On Oct 25, 7:00 am, David wrote:
On Wed, 24 Oct 2007 11:50:44 -0700, RHF
wrote:





On Oct 23, 10:18 pm, Ross Archer wrote:
On Oct 21, 1:53 am, RHF wrote:
- You can choose to ignore what science says,
- but you cannot claim that scientific opinion
- says something other than what it does.
- Humans are causing the majority of recent warming.
- That is the state of current best scientific knowledge.
- This is not opinion. It is documented fact.

RA - DUH ! - Scientific 'Opinion(s)' is NOT
Indisputable Incontrivertable Scientific Fact [.]

Documenting a Group of Like 'Opinions'
Does Not Make These 'Opinions' Facts.

and thems is the facts ~ rhf
.

- Scientific opinion = what the available facts and evidence indicates
- after the application of REASON.

RA - Alas It Is Still 'Opinion' -and- Not A Hard Fact [.]

- What, in the absence of absolute proof,
- would you use to establish what's true?

RA - Actual Hard Facts -and- The Truth
-not- a Collection of 'Opinions'

- Reading tea leaves?
- Using divining rods?
- Praying to the Pink Sky Unicorn?

RA - There You Go Off-the-Deep-End
-Point-of-Fact- I never suggested any of those.

- Sorry, but when the majority of scientists make a statement based
- on evidence and reason, it's by far the most likely to be true.

RA - Selective Evidence and Skewed Reasoning
Does Not Make Foregone Conclusions True.

- Scientific "opinion" is the closest to fact.
- I don't know what you're using, but it's inferior.

RA - 'Close To' a "Fact" still is NOT A FACT [.]

That's Common Sense -and- The Answer To The Fear Mongering
of Global Warming is the Understanding that Climate Change does
Exist and that We 'may-be' Loooking at a Period of Climate Change
in the Future of Mankind upon this Planet that We Call The Earth.

- -- ross-

RA - You Are Simply Entitled To Your 'Opinion'
-and- That's A Fact ~ RHF
.

- Wouldn't it be prudent to prepare for the worst just in case?

Understanding that Climate Change may be in-fact be happening at
this point in this present Epoch in the Life of a Planet {Earth Age}
is good for Mankind. - http://www.dinosauria.com/dml/history.htm

With this Knowledge Mankind can forward in our Planning and
Adapt to the Changes* caused by the Earth's Weather getting
Warmer or even Colder.
* A Hundred or better a Thousand Years will tell Us better just
what may be happening.
http://pubs.usgs.gov/gip/geotime/time.html .
{Hysteria about "Global Warming" Serves No One Except
the One World Control Freaks.}

Adapting to these Climate Changes is good because it will help
the majority of Mankind to Survive and Adjust to a 'New" Earth.

- What harm would it do?

Yielding to the Fear Mongering of "Global Warming" and the attempt
to use this Fear as an Means-of-Control of the Masses to Dictate
"How People Will Live In The Future" according to the word of the
Almighty AL GORE - Is Not The Answer [.]

The Monitization of Pollution {Carbon Credits} is Not The Answer.
Just a Scheme to Gain Economic Control Over World-Wide Power
Generation and Global Industrial Production and Method Taxation
and Limitations on All Human Activity.

Common Sense -IS- The Answer : And Common Sense Says :
1st - We Understand
2nd - We Adapt
3rd - We Survive

That's Common Sense -and- The Answer To The Fear Mongering
of "Global Warming" is the Understanding that Climate Change does
Exist and that We 'may-be' Looking at a Period of Climate Change
in the Future of Mankind upon this Planet that We Call The Earth.
* Understanding The Truth About Climate Change.
* Adapting To The Realities Of Climate Change.
* Mankind's Survivial Through Climate Change And Beyond.

common sense - makes sense ~ RHF

Common Sense - The Answer To The Fear Mongering of GlobalWarming
 

Well, I will tell y'all what.The last few days and nights right here in
Jackson,Mississippi,,, the weather has been rainy and wet and cloudy and
cold.Right now, it is still cloudy and cold outside, not raining though,
right now.So, where is that confounded ''global warming''? Doggy
(Blueberry) is sleeping up under a wool blanket on her couch, snoreing
her arse off.You just know when a dog is feeling cold,,,,,, It's COLD!
cuhulin

Common Sense - The Answer To The Fear Mongering of GlobalWarming
 

I ain'ts worrit about no global warming.Maybe I will (I need to get up
and go pee anyway,,, Gals) jack the floor funaces theromstats up a few
more notches.Some dredging is fixiin to get started somewhere along the
Missisippi Gulf Coast for some ships bringin in buku gas.(yesterdays
www.clarionledger.com rag, Business section,, Clarion Liar) and some
dredigin is going to happen over yonder in Blackberry Bayou, near
Hackberry, whatever they call that Cajun place) in Louisiana, wayyyyyyyy
over yonder near the Lonestar Republic of TEXAS.
www.cryptome.org.index.html
www.devilfinder.com Song Texas,,,,
Song Mississippi,,,,,, Song Cajunland
cuhulin