LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #22   Report Post  
Old January 5th 08, 08:37 PM posted to rec.radio.shortwave
RHF RHF is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jun 2006
Posts: 8,652
Default WHY - Bury Your Shortwave Radio Listening (SWL) Antenna'sCoaxCable Feed-in-Line ?

On Jan 5, 9:56*am, Billy Burpelson wrote:
Billy Burpelson wrote:


RHF wrote:


FWIW - Burying the Coax Cable is simply one of the many
Synergistic Elements that goes into making a Low Noise
Shortwave Radio Listening (SWL) Antenna -a-la- John Doty


Three Rec.Radio.Shortwave Messages to Read -by- John Doty
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.r...bc6a2bf8acc12d
Well, "John Doty" in the reference above says:


Any *unshielded* [my emphasis added] conductor in your antenna/ground system is capable
of picking up noise: the antenna, the "lead-in" wire...
First of all, isn't the "lead-in wire" (coaxial cable in this
discussion) -shielded- ? So according to his -own- statement, coax
shouldn't have to be buried, at least from a noise mitigation viewpoint..


Doty continues:


You can keep noise currents away from the antenna by giving them
a path to ground near the house, giving antenna currents a path to
ground away from the house, and burying the the coaxial cable from
the house to the antenna.
In the 1930s, Bell Laboratories, while investigating power line
influence on telephone cables, proved that burial had NO effect on noise
being induced into the telephone cables; i.e., 20 feet of aerial
separation, from a noise standpoint, was exactly the same as 18 feet of
aerial separation plus being buried 2 feet deep.


Hmmm...should I believe "John Doty" or Bell Labs? You're a smart guy --
I'll let you figure that one out for yourself. * :-)

dxAce wrote:
Or, you might believe the 1990's rather than the 1930's :-)


- Well, I don't know about the "1990's" (isn't this the 2000s?),
- but it became a big issue in the 30s due to the rapidly
- expanding electrification of America.

John Doty wrote his 'stuff' in the 1990s.

- In any event, I'm sure that even the most superficial research
- on your part will show that the applicable Laws of Physics
- have not changed since then.

BP -wrt- The Applicable Law of Physics:- No They Have Not.

Undeniable Fact # 1 - The Man Made RFI-EMF Environment
Has Changed Greatly : Increasing one or two Magnitudes from
the 1930s to the 1990s.

Undeniable Fact # 2 - Man's Ability to Accurately Measure the
RFI-EMF Environment and It's Effects Has Changed Greatly :
Increasing at least a Magnitude from the 1930s to the 1990s.

super-ficial-ly yours ~ RHF
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
FA: WWII Radio, Hammarlund Spkr, Rare CB, SONAR Item, WE Headphones, STUFF all Good! cooltube Equipment 2 July 10th 05 03:25 PM
FA: WWII Radio, Hammarlund Spkr, Rare CB, SONAR Item, WE Headphones, STUFF all Good! cooltube CB 2 July 10th 05 03:25 PM
FA: WWII Radio, Hammarlund Spkr, Rare CB, SONAR Item, WE Headphones, STUFF all Good! cooltube Shortwave 1 July 10th 05 03:25 PM
FS:RG8X 18 FOOT COAX PATCH CORDS Kb9igg Swap 0 December 27th 04 03:18 PM
fa> Neat Stuff, Mostly inexpensive, all Good Collectable & Radio related! Rich WA2RQY CB 0 November 23rd 04 03:27 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:52 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017