"D Peter Maus" wrote in message
...
David Eduardo wrote:
There was no fight, other than in the media. The junta fell when the
members started to disagree, and elections were finally held. In aobut 8
years, I saw 5 changes of government, only two by elections. On person
alone could not do anything about that...


Then don't sell yourself as a Freedom Fighter. Do not sell yourself
as Risking Life and Property as a Defender of Democracy.

Excuse me, but when one comes within a hair of being shot (as evidenced by
the disappearance of my colleague at the newspaper), and exiled with next to
nothing, about all that can be risked has been risked. There was not a civil
war, just one of over 100 changes of government in the 150 years of
independence of Ecuador. The people had not taken up arms for decades
there...

Scans of documents supporting your claims, however, have.

Additions add depth, and do not change the underlying facts. It took me 5
years to get a scan of a verification letter for HCRM1 that I had written in
the 60's, and I finally got one from well respected DXer John Callerman of
Krum, TX. Adding that only gave a bit of dimension to the information, and
changed not a tad the facts.

As documented in this group. DXAce having made that point more than a year
ago. Myself having witnessed what he pointed out had changed.

DXace proved nothing... in fact, I have given dozens of names of persons who
can corroborate the facts he so glibly dismissed. To his crippled mind, the
idea of a 17 year old with a corporation and a business is impossible...
witness his obsession with "nothing in your name" when corporations are a
way of life in business. He is simply ignorant of how things work in
business and outside the US.

You're very good at playing semantic games. Your debate coach would
be proud. But you are in conflict with your own facts. Your credibility,
like CCU's stock price, is slipping.


Doroteo Arámbula you are not.

Nor would I want to be.


Probably the truest thing you've said, to date.

Pancho Villa was basically a thief and a thug, who latched on to the Mexican
Revolution to achieve notoriety and to escape prosecution by the law.

On Jan 8, 11:39*am, "David Cornholio" wrote:
DXace proved nothing... in fact, I have given dozens of names of persons who
can corroborate the facts he so glibly dismissed. To his crippled mind, the
idea of a 17 year old with a corporation and a business is impossible...

Impossible? Not at all. Not even that unusual. What DxAce finds
difficult to believe, I think, is that you'd actually tell the truth
about something.

David Eduardo wrote:
"D Peter Maus" wrote in message
...
David Eduardo wrote:
There was no fight, other than in the media. The junta fell when the
members started to disagree, and elections were finally held. In aobut 8
years, I saw 5 changes of government, only two by elections. On person
alone could not do anything about that...

Then don't sell yourself as a Freedom Fighter. Do not sell yourself
as Risking Life and Property as a Defender of Democracy.

Excuse me, but when one comes within a hair of being shot (as evidenced by
the disappearance of my colleague at the newspaper), and exiled with next to
nothing, about all that can be risked has been risked. There was not a civil
war, just one of over 100 changes of government in the 150 years of
independence of Ecuador. The people had not taken up arms for decades
there...
Scans of documents supporting your claims, however, have.

Additions add depth, and do not change the underlying facts. It took me 5
years to get a scan of a verification letter for HCRM1 that I had written in
the 60's, and I finally got one from well respected DXer John Callerman of
Krum, TX. Adding that only gave a bit of dimension to the information, and
changed not a tad the facts.

As documented in this group. DXAce having made that point more than a year
ago. Myself having witnessed what he pointed out had changed.

DXace proved nothing... in fact, I have given dozens of names of persons who
can corroborate the facts he so glibly dismissed. To his crippled mind, the
idea of a 17 year old with a corporation and a business is impossible...
witness his obsession with "nothing in your name" when corporations are a
way of life in business. He is simply ignorant of how things work in
business and outside the US.
You're very good at playing semantic games. Your debate coach would
be proud. But you are in conflict with your own facts. Your credibility,
like CCU's stock price, is slipping.


Doroteo Arámbula you are not.
Nor would I want to be.

Probably the truest thing you've said, to date.

Pancho Villa was basically a thief and a thug, who latched on to the Mexican
Revolution to achieve notoriety and to escape prosecution by the law.



But he didn't leave the fight behind and then wave the flag of
Liberty. If nothing else, he stood and fought for what he believed.

Like I said, leave the fight behind, and you risk nothing. Put a
weapon in your hand, and you can make the claim.

You opted to take the road out that was handed you.

You may have lost much. But your risk, like other things, isn't what
you claim.

D Peter Maus wrote:
David Eduardo wrote:
"D Peter Maus" wrote in message
...
David Eduardo wrote:
There was no fight, other than in the media. The junta fell when the
members started to disagree, and elections were finally held. In
aobut 8 years, I saw 5 changes of government, only two by elections.
On person alone could not do anything about that...

Then don't sell yourself as a Freedom Fighter. Do not sell
yourself as Risking Life and Property as a Defender of Democracy.

Excuse me, but when one comes within a hair of being shot (as
evidenced by the disappearance of my colleague at the newspaper), and
exiled with next to nothing, about all that can be risked has been
risked. There was not a civil war, just one of over 100 changes of
government in the 150 years of independence of Ecuador. The people had
not taken up arms for decades there...
Scans of documents supporting your claims, however, have.

Additions add depth, and do not change the underlying facts. It took
me 5 years to get a scan of a verification letter for HCRM1 that I had
written in the 60's, and I finally got one from well respected DXer
John Callerman of Krum, TX. Adding that only gave a bit of dimension
to the information, and changed not a tad the facts.

As documented in this group. DXAce having made that point more than a
year ago. Myself having witnessed what he pointed out had changed.

DXace proved nothing... in fact, I have given dozens of names of
persons who can corroborate the facts he so glibly dismissed. To his
crippled mind, the idea of a 17 year old with a corporation and a
business is impossible... witness his obsession with "nothing in your
name" when corporations are a way of life in business. He is simply
ignorant of how things work in business and outside the US.
You're very good at playing semantic games. Your debate coach
would be proud. But you are in conflict with your own facts. Your
credibility, like CCU's stock price, is slipping.


Doroteo Arámbula you are not.
Nor would I want to be.

Probably the truest thing you've said, to date.

Pancho Villa was basically a thief and a thug, who latched on to the
Mexican Revolution to achieve notoriety and to escape prosecution by
the law.


But he didn't leave the fight behind and then wave the flag of
Liberty. If nothing else, he stood and fought for what he believed.

Like I said, leave the fight behind, and you risk nothing. Put a
weapon in your hand, and you can make the claim.

You opted to take the road out that was handed you.

You may have lost much. But your risk, like other things, isn't what
you claim.


You know nothing about the Chicago Boys, do you?

David wrote:

D Peter Maus wrote:
David Eduardo wrote:
"D Peter Maus" wrote in message
...
David Eduardo wrote:
There was no fight, other than in the media. The junta fell when the
members started to disagree, and elections were finally held. In
aobut 8 years, I saw 5 changes of government, only two by elections.
On person alone could not do anything about that...

Then don't sell yourself as a Freedom Fighter. Do not sell
yourself as Risking Life and Property as a Defender of Democracy.

Excuse me, but when one comes within a hair of being shot (as
evidenced by the disappearance of my colleague at the newspaper), and
exiled with next to nothing, about all that can be risked has been
risked. There was not a civil war, just one of over 100 changes of
government in the 150 years of independence of Ecuador. The people had
not taken up arms for decades there...
Scans of documents supporting your claims, however, have.

Additions add depth, and do not change the underlying facts. It took
me 5 years to get a scan of a verification letter for HCRM1 that I had
written in the 60's, and I finally got one from well respected DXer
John Callerman of Krum, TX. Adding that only gave a bit of dimension
to the information, and changed not a tad the facts.

As documented in this group. DXAce having made that point more than a
year ago. Myself having witnessed what he pointed out had changed.

DXace proved nothing... in fact, I have given dozens of names of
persons who can corroborate the facts he so glibly dismissed. To his
crippled mind, the idea of a 17 year old with a corporation and a
business is impossible... witness his obsession with "nothing in your
name" when corporations are a way of life in business. He is simply
ignorant of how things work in business and outside the US.
You're very good at playing semantic games. Your debate coach
would be proud. But you are in conflict with your own facts. Your
credibility, like CCU's stock price, is slipping.


Doroteo Arámbula you are not.
Nor would I want to be.

Probably the truest thing you've said, to date.

Pancho Villa was basically a thief and a thug, who latched on to the
Mexican Revolution to achieve notoriety and to escape prosecution by
the law.


But he didn't leave the fight behind and then wave the flag of
Liberty. If nothing else, he stood and fought for what he believed.

Like I said, leave the fight behind, and you risk nothing. Put a
weapon in your hand, and you can make the claim.

You opted to take the road out that was handed you.

You may have lost much. But your risk, like other things, isn't what
you claim.


You know nothing about the Chicago Boys, do you?

Bigger than Fidel, Bigger than Che... It's David Frackelton Gleason, Freedom
Fighter!

dxAce wrote:

David wrote:

D Peter Maus wrote:
David Eduardo wrote:
"D Peter Maus" wrote in message
...
David Eduardo wrote:
There was no fight, other than in the media. The junta fell when the
members started to disagree, and elections were finally held. In
aobut 8 years, I saw 5 changes of government, only two by elections.
On person alone could not do anything about that...
Then don't sell yourself as a Freedom Fighter. Do not sell
yourself as Risking Life and Property as a Defender of Democracy.
Excuse me, but when one comes within a hair of being shot (as
evidenced by the disappearance of my colleague at the newspaper), and
exiled with next to nothing, about all that can be risked has been
risked. There was not a civil war, just one of over 100 changes of
government in the 150 years of independence of Ecuador. The people had
not taken up arms for decades there...
Scans of documents supporting your claims, however, have.
Additions add depth, and do not change the underlying facts. It took
me 5 years to get a scan of a verification letter for HCRM1 that I had
written in the 60's, and I finally got one from well respected DXer
John Callerman of Krum, TX. Adding that only gave a bit of dimension
to the information, and changed not a tad the facts.

As documented in this group. DXAce having made that point more than a
year ago. Myself having witnessed what he pointed out had changed.
DXace proved nothing... in fact, I have given dozens of names of
persons who can corroborate the facts he so glibly dismissed. To his
crippled mind, the idea of a 17 year old with a corporation and a
business is impossible... witness his obsession with "nothing in your
name" when corporations are a way of life in business. He is simply
ignorant of how things work in business and outside the US.
You're very good at playing semantic games. Your debate coach
would be proud. But you are in conflict with your own facts. Your
credibility, like CCU's stock price, is slipping.


Doroteo Arámbula you are not.
Nor would I want to be.
Probably the truest thing you've said, to date.
Pancho Villa was basically a thief and a thug, who latched on to the
Mexican Revolution to achieve notoriety and to escape prosecution by
the law.

But he didn't leave the fight behind and then wave the flag of
Liberty. If nothing else, he stood and fought for what he believed.

Like I said, leave the fight behind, and you risk nothing. Put a
weapon in your hand, and you can make the claim.

You opted to take the road out that was handed you.

You may have lost much. But your risk, like other things, isn't what
you claim.


You know nothing about the Chicago Boys, do you?

Bigger than Fidel, Bigger than Che... It's David Frackelton Gleason, Freedom
Fighter!


Thanks, but I already knew you were a moron.

David Eduardo wrote:

"D Peter Maus" wrote in message
...
David Eduardo wrote:
There was no fight, other than in the media. The junta fell when the
members started to disagree, and elections were finally held. In aobut 8
years, I saw 5 changes of government, only two by elections. On person
alone could not do anything about that...


Then don't sell yourself as a Freedom Fighter. Do not sell yourself
as Risking Life and Property as a Defender of Democracy.

Excuse me, but when one comes within a hair of being shot (as evidenced by
the disappearance of my colleague at the newspaper), and exiled with next to
nothing, about all that can be risked has been risked. There was not a civil
war, just one of over 100 changes of government in the 150 years of
independence of Ecuador. The people had not taken up arms for decades
there...

Scans of documents supporting your claims, however, have.

Additions add depth, and do not change the underlying facts. It took me 5
years to get a scan of a verification letter for HCRM1 that I had written in
the 60's, and I finally got one from well respected DXer John Callerman of
Krum, TX. Adding that only gave a bit of dimension to the information, and
changed not a tad the facts.

Ah, the 60's! That was long berfore you adopted the 'Eduardo' shtick.

As documented in this group. DXAce having made that point more than a year
ago. Myself having witnessed what he pointed out had changed.

DXace proved nothing...

Sure I have! The biggest problem you have is that you are a pathological liar.

in fact, I have given dozens of names of persons who
can corroborate the facts he so glibly dismissed. To his crippled mind, the
idea of a 17 year old with a corporation and a business is impossible...
witness his obsession with "nothing in your name" when corporations are a
way of life in business. He is simply ignorant of how things work in
business and outside the US.

It's interesting how much you are now infatuated with the corporation thing! I
do recall you saying in the past (when questioned about the ownership thing)
that the number one reason you wanted Ecuadorian citizenship was so that you
could put your *radio stations* in your name.

But *conveniently* you were thrown out of the country just days before getting
citizenship.

It all makes for an interesting story, with little or no paper trail.



You're very good at playing semantic games. Your debate coach would
be proud. But you are in conflict with your own facts. Your credibility,
like CCU's stock price, is slipping.


Doroteo Arámbula you are not.

Nor would I want to be.


Probably the truest thing you've said, to date.

Pancho Villa was basically a thief and a thug, who latched on to the Mexican
Revolution to achieve notoriety and to escape prosecution by the law.

dxAce wrote:


It all makes for an interesting story, with little or no paper trail.


As a disinterested observer and without taking sides in this Great
Debate, just how much 'paper trail' should be expected from something that:

a) happened around -40- years ago
b) in a foreign country
c) and occurred during a turbulent government take-over

Do you speak/read Spanish?

Do you have access to the 40 year old foreign newspapers? If so, have
you researched them?

No?

Well then, how do you know there -isn't- a 'paper trail'?

Billy Burpelson wrote:

dxAce wrote:

It all makes for an interesting story, with little or no paper trail.

As a disinterested observer and without taking sides in this Great
Debate, just how much 'paper trail' should be expected from something that:

a) happened around -40- years ago
b) in a foreign country
c) and occurred during a turbulent government take-over

Do you speak/read Spanish?

Do you have access to the 40 year old foreign newspapers? If so, have
you researched them?

No?

Well then, how do you know there -isn't- a 'paper trail'?

Because I long ago discovered that David 'Eduardo' was a pathological liar.

"dxAce" wrote in message
...


Billy Burpelson wrote:

dxAce wrote:

It all makes for an interesting story, with little or no paper trail.

As a disinterested observer and without taking sides in this Great
Debate, just how much 'paper trail' should be expected from something
that:

a) happened around -40- years ago
b) in a foreign country
c) and occurred during a turbulent government take-over

Do you speak/read Spanish?

Do you have access to the 40 year old foreign newspapers? If so, have
you researched them?

No?

Well then, how do you know there -isn't- a 'paper trail'?

Because I long ago discovered that David 'Eduardo' was a pathological
liar.

With absolutely no proof.

What you have done is trumped up insignificant issues and used them to
support your claim. For example, the NAB's error of incorrectly printing my
title in the program for a convention seminar was seen by you to be evidence
of lying about my title. Despite demonstrating to you how the error occured
and how the title, in fact, did not exist, you laid claim to your belief
that there was some kind of chicanery or deceipt involved.

Even more amusing was the insistence that I could not have editied my high
school´s paper since I was but a Sophomore when I became editior... yet the
totally verifiable fact that in that year, there was no Junior or Senior
class fell on your deaf ears. My class was the first to "extend" the school
from 1st to 9th grade to 1st to 12th grade, meaning that for that first
year, the "High School" had only one grade. You could verify that with an
e-mail, but didn't. You preferred to trump that realtive triviality into a
case to demonstrate your claim I had lied... which is not so.

And on and on with the same sort of thing, none of which proved anything.