| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
|
|
#1
January 9th 08, 09:35 PM
posted to rec.radio.shortwave
|
|||
|
|||
Pioneer SX-2000 stereo tube amped receiver-vintage 1968-MINT-for sale
Audiophiles debate this one -- maybe read URL:
"David" wrote in message ... Dorpmuller wrote: An AUCTION doesn't mean for sale! "Dwight D. Eisenhower" wrote in message ... http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll...m=140196937721 And "tube" doesn't automatically mean it sounds good. Audiophiles avidly debate this one -- maybe read URL: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tube_sound Lamont |
|
#2
January 10th 08, 05:48 PM
posted to rec.radio.shortwave
|
|||
|
|||
|
Pioneer SX-2000 stereo tube amped receiver-vintage 1968-MINT-forsale
The Shadow wrote:
Audiophiles debate this one -- maybe read URL: "David" wrote in message ... Dorpmuller wrote: An AUCTION doesn't mean for sale! "Dwight D. Eisenhower" wrote in message ... http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll...m=140196937721 And "tube" doesn't automatically mean it sounds good. Audiophiles avidly debate this one -- maybe read URL: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tube_sound Lamont They also fought against lowering the speed of phonograph records from 78.66 RPM to 33.33 RPM. My definition of audiophile is someone who spent so much money on hardware he can't really enjoy the tunes. |
|
#3
January 12th 08, 12:10 PM
posted to rec.radio.shortwave
|
|||
|
|||
|
Pioneer SX-2000 stereo tube amped receiver-vintage 1968-MINT-forsale
On Jan 10, 12:48*pm, David wrote:
The Shadow wrote: Audiophiles debate this one *-- maybe read *URL: "David" wrote in message ... Dorpmuller wrote: An AUCTION doesn't mean for sale! "Dwight D. Eisenhower" wrote in message ... http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll...m=140196937721 And "tube" doesn't automatically mean it sounds good. Audiophiles avidly debate this one *-- maybe read *URL: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tube_sound Lamont They also fought against lowering the speed of phonograph records from 78.66 RPM to 33.33 RPM. My definition of audiophile is someone who spent so much money on hardware he can't really enjoy the tunes.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - the best sounding stereo I own, cost me $10- it was built in 1965, and is a single ended tube design- dual monoblocks- in an Akai reel to reel, model M8 it sounds better than my modern digital Technics solid state rack system even a "cheap" stereo tube set, sounds better than solid state- tubes color the sound- solid state music has no soul |
|
#4
January 12th 08, 01:58 PM
posted to rec.radio.shortwave
|
|||
|
|||
|
Pioneer SX-2000 stereo tube amped receiver-vintage 1968-MINT-forsale
Dwight D. Eisenhower wrote:
On Jan 10, 12:48 pm, David wrote: The Shadow wrote: Audiophiles debate this one -- maybe read URL: "David" wrote in message ... Dorpmuller wrote: An AUCTION doesn't mean for sale! "Dwight D. Eisenhower" wrote in message ... http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll...m=140196937721 And "tube" doesn't automatically mean it sounds good. Audiophiles avidly debate this one -- maybe read URL: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tube_sound Lamont They also fought against lowering the speed of phonograph records from 78.66 RPM to 33.33 RPM. My definition of audiophile is someone who spent so much money on hardware he can't really enjoy the tunes.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - the best sounding stereo I own, cost me $10- it was built in 1965, and is a single ended tube design- dual monoblocks- in an Akai reel to reel, model M8 it sounds better than my modern digital Technics solid state rack system even a "cheap" stereo tube set, sounds better than solid state- tubes color the sound- solid state music has no soul That's absurd. Perhaps true 40 or 50 years ago. |
| Reply |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
![The Shadow[_2_] is offline](https://www.radiobanter.com/images/SultanThemeVB3R/statusicon/user_offline.gif)
Hybrid Mode
