Does nay one know about?

LAst september i had communication with them , but since then they
did not responded to my emails

An order is pending

On Jan 13, 10:53�am, Zach Liang wrote:
Does nay one know about?

LAst september �i had communication with them , but since then �they
did �not responded to my emails

An order is pending

"radio" is ****ed...

IBOCcrock wrote:

"radio" is ****ed...

....which no doubt explains why you spend all your time hanging out on
and posting to a "radio" news group ...

P.S.
I hope you can appreciate the irony of your statement.... but, please,
feel free to keep shooting yourself in the foot. :-)

On Jan 13, 11:58�am, Billy Burpelson wrote:
IBOCcrock wrote:
"radio" is ****ed...

...which no doubt explains why you spend all your time hanging out on
and posting to a "radio" news group ...

P.S.
I hope you can appreciate the irony of your statement.... but, please,
feel free to keep shooting yourself in the foot. � �:-)

"Is shortwave radio dying? A look at station counts from South
America"

Yea, this is why the BBC, and others, have stopped broadcasting to the
US - others have blown up their shortwavbe towers. Radio Shack only
carries a handful of SW receivers, and are not usually on display.
Radio is the US is declining, just a sSW radio is, too. There's
something called "progress", and the Internet.

Hi,

Actually I pick up the BBC exceptionally well most days between 2100 - 2300
UTC on 9525 KHz & 5975 KHz......

Abb N


"IBOCcrock" wrote in message
...
On Jan 13, 11:58�am, Billy Burpelson wrote:
IBOCcrock wrote:
"radio" is ****ed...

...which no doubt explains why you spend all your time hanging out on
and posting to a "radio" news group ...

P.S.
I hope you can appreciate the irony of your statement.... but, please,
feel free to keep shooting yourself in the foot. � �:-)

"Is shortwave radio dying? A look at station counts from South
America"

Yea, this is why the BBC, and others, have stopped broadcasting to the
US - others have blown up their shortwavbe towers. Radio Shack only
carries a handful of SW receivers, and are not usually on display.
Radio is the US is declining, just a sSW radio is, too. There's
something called "progress", and the Internet.

Abb N wrote:
Hi,

Actually I pick up the BBC exceptionally well most days between 2100 -
2300 UTC on 9525 KHz & 5975 KHz......

Abb N


"IBOCcrock" wrote in message
...
On Jan 13, 11:58�am, Billy Burpelson wrote:
IBOCcrock wrote:
"radio" is ****ed...

...which no doubt explains why you spend all your time hanging out on
and posting to a "radio" news group ...

P.S.
I hope you can appreciate the irony of your statement.... but, please,
feel free to keep shooting yourself in the foot. � �:-)

"Is shortwave radio dying? A look at station counts from South
America"

Yea, this is why the BBC, and others, have stopped broadcasting to the
US - others have blown up their shortwavbe towers. Radio Shack only
carries a handful of SW receivers, and are not usually on display.
Radio is the US is declining, just a sSW radio is, too. There's
something called "progress", and the Internet.

I get it flawlessly every day from 0000-2400z on 2315 mHz.

IBOCcrock wrote:

"radio" is ****ed...

On Jan 13, 11:58�am, Billy Burpelson wrote:

...which no doubt explains why you spend all your time hanging out
on and posting to a "radio" news group ...

P.S. I hope you can appreciate the irony of your statement.... but,
please, feel free to keep shooting yourself in the foot. � �:-)

IBOCcrock wrote:

Yea, this is why the BBC, and others, have stopped broadcasting to
the US - others have blown up their shortwavbe towers. Radio Shack
only carries a handful of SW receivers, and are not usually on
display. Radio is the US is declining, just a sSW radio is, too.
There's something called "progress", and the Internet.

Well, -if- what you say is true, then why do you keep hanging out and
posting on a group about such a dead subject? Wouldn't your time be
better spent elsewhere?

Apparently, you DO miss the irony... ;-)

On Jan 13, 3:01Â*pm, Billy Burpelson wrote:
IBOCcrock wrote:
"radio" is ****ed...
On Jan 13, 11:58�am, Billy Burpelson wrote:
...which no doubt explains why you spend all your time hanging out
on and posting to a "radio" news group ...

P.S. I hope you can appreciate the irony of your statement.... but,
please, feel free to keep shooting yourself in the foot. � �:-)
IBOCcrock wrote:
Yea, this is why the BBC, and others, have stopped broadcasting to
the US - others have blown up their shortwavbe towers. Radio Shack
only carries a handful of SW receivers, and are not usually on
display. Radio is the US is declining, just a sSW radio is, too.
There's something called "progress", and the Internet.

Well, -if- what you say is true, then why do you keep hanging out and
posting on a group about such a dead subject? Wouldn't your time be
better spent elsewhere?

Apparently, you DO miss the irony... Â* ;-)

I enjoy such reactions.

On Jan 13, 9:53Â*am, IBOCcrock wrote:
On Jan 13, 11:58�am, Billy Burpelson wrote:

IBOCcrock wrote:
"radio" is ****ed...

...which no doubt explains why you spend all your time hanging out on
and posting to a "radio" news group ...

P.S.
I hope you can appreciate the irony of your statement.... but, please,
feel free to keep shooting yourself in the foot. � �:-)
-
- "Is shortwave radio dying? A look at station counts
- from South America"
-
- Yea, this is why the BBC, and others, have stopped broadcasting
- to the US - others have blown up their shortwavbe towers.
- Radio Shack only carries a handful of SW receivers, and are not
- usually on display.
- Radio is the US is declining, just a sSW radio is, too.
- There's something called "progress", and the Internet.
-

I B OC'Deed and Half Crocked - huha, Huha. HUHA ! ~ RHF

You are the Anti-Radio Anti-Radio-Broadcasting Voice-of-Doom !

Who loves New Media so much that he has to come to and
Old Media "Free" Over-the-Air Radio forum and Preach Hate
against traditional AM-FM Shortwave Radio.

Little IB OC'Deed - Yours Must Be A Sad Sick Life [.]

glad to be me and enjoying my 'free' over-the-air radio ~ RHF

On Jan 13, 11:58�am, Billy Burpelson wrote:
IBOCcrock wrote:
"radio" is ****ed...

...which no doubt explains why you spend all your time hanging out on
and posting to a "radio" news group ...

P.S.
I hope you can appreciate the irony of your statement.... but, please,
feel free to keep shooting yourself in the foot. � �:-)

"BRACING FOR THE WORST"

"In fact, the earnings report was so dismal that it shocked industry
analysts and led to yet another drop in Citadel's already sagging
stock price, pushing it further into penny stock territory. Given a
brutal outlook for the radio business and its own particularly
alarming financial future, the company was forced to write off an
unexpectedly large portion of the value of its stations, sending
investors running for cover. UPDATE: as the trading day continued, CDL
shares were pounded even further, closing down $1.46 at $2.40 a share
(a 38% loss in just one day). Volume was a heavy 11.5 million shares
(405% higher than normal) and Citadel's total market cap loss for the
day was a staggering $385,000,000. As recently as 2003, Citadel shares
traded as high as $23.00"

http://radioequalizer.blogspot.com/2...er-faces..html