Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"RIAA Kills Sirius Satellite Radio, Destroys Value of Consumer
Product" "RIAA has now pushed legislation through the house to protect content delivered through high-definition (HD) radio receivers." http://xm-satellite-radio.blogspot.c...ite-radio.html |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jan 23, 3:49*am, IBOCcrock wrote:
"RIAA Kills Sirius Satellite Radio, Destroys Value of Consumer Product" "RIAA has now pushed legislation through the house to protect content delivered through high-definition (HD) radio receivers." http://xm-satellite-radio.blogspot.m...ls-sirius-sate... I B OC'Deed and Half-Crocked - It's About Radio Take The Time To Listen . . . and Enjoy ! ![]() http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1kV4qrrVdEg |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jan 23, 7:02 am, RHF wrote:
On Jan 23, 3:49 am, IBOCcrock wrote: "RIAA Kills Sirius Satellite Radio, Destroys Value of Consumer Product" "RIAA has now pushed legislation through the house to protect content delivered through high-definition (HD) radio receivers." http://xm-satellite-radio.blogspot.m...ls-sirius-sate... I B OC'Deed and Half-Crocked - It's About Radio Take The Time To Listen . . . and Enjoy ! ![]() . "Want to Kill HD Radio?" "Let's say that radio companies have to start paying royalties on the music that they play. Even if it is a flat percentage of all revenue like other outlets are going to be charged, HD Radio streams would do nothing more than serve to drive up royalty payments for NAB members. The overwhelming majority of terrestrial listeners ARE NOT listening to HD Radio. Ads on HD Radio will be dirt cheap for a very long time. The HD streams may not be able to cover royalty on music from ad revenues. Do you think that Clear Channel will continue to pump money in to HD Radio equipment, expanding services and coverage if the payoff in the end is an INCREASE in copyright royalties and nothing more?" http://dualsub.wordpress.com/2007/11...kill-hd-radio/ |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 23 Jan 2008 03:49:49 -0800 (PST), IBOCcrock
wrote: "RIAA Kills Sirius Satellite Radio, Destroys Value of Consumer Product" "RIAA has now pushed legislation through the house to protect content delivered through high-definition (HD) radio receivers." http://xm-satellite-radio.blogspot.c...ite-radio.html First, HD doesn't stand for high-definition, it stands for hybrid digital, as you should know since you spend an awful lot of time worrying about it. Second, copyrights should be abolished. They act to suppress creativiity rather than promote it, they go against nature, and they violate the state prohibition against imposing religion because they force the public to respect the sanctity of an immaterial concept. Third, why the hell are you spamming this group, you worthless piece of ****? |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jim Shaffer wrote:
Third, why the hell are you spamming this group, you worthless piece of ****? dxAce has a sockpuppet? mike |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() m II wrote: Jim Shaffer wrote: Third, why the hell are you spamming this group, you worthless piece of ****? dxAce has a sockpuppet? Yeah, must be you, dumbass. |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Jim Shaffer" wrote in message ... Second, copyrights should be abolished. They act to suppress creativiity rather than promote it, they go against nature, and they violate the state prohibition against imposing religion because they force the public to respect the sanctity of an immaterial concept. I believe that there should be copyrights/patents, but not with the sort of force they now exist with. For instance, a patent should only be good for say, five years. If you think about it, technology changes so much in that amount of time that any patent will long since have been superceded. Ditto with copyright, at least for music. Maybe only a year or two on that. If you think about it, 90% or more of all music is passe and very few people care to listen to it after only a few months. Certainly the market drops off sharply after that time. Some allowance should be made for composers and artists ONLY to get per-play radio royalties, but the RIAA and the record companies themselves should get no residuals past a cutoff point to be determined by sales figures. i.e. when sales drop off to say, 1000 units a month, royalties should go to only the artist and composer. Smarter people than me could crunch the numbers better than me. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
blog post: shortwave radio killed god | Shortwave | |||
STILL NOTHING FROM THE RIAA AND MPAA | Policy | |||
STILL NOTHING FROM THE RIAA AND MPAA | General | |||
STILL NOTHING FROM THE RIAA AND MPAA | Policy | |||
Corporate Companies Killed The Radio Star | Broadcasting |