Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jan 30, 5:30 pm, msg wrote:
Greetings: There is a short thread in alt.internet.wireless regarding QRN from data over unshielded media (HomePlug, HomePNA, phoneline-nets, etc.) See thread title: "Can I do this?" SWLers should weigh in on this issue. Michael Properly designed systems, built with quality parts and built and tested by skilled workers are a very minor problem. But most real world systems are far from properly designed, and forget the quality parts and skilled assembly and testing. Between BPL and the myriad of devices that either have logic controls or switch mode power supplies, SWLs, and hams, are fighting a lost battle. I simply can't see my neighbors caring one bit if their shiny new network, smart house controller, or DSL cause me problems. After all they can't comprehend why anyone would want to listen to weak noisy signals. I worked for a little over two months wrapping up, winding down, and EMI certification lab. Even if a device meets Class B regs, it can still be a RFI nightmare. We only examined "conducted emissions" which cover not only power line noise, but also the noise into all data/signal I/O cables. High speed means high noise. Good Luck Terry |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
OT - Speed Test - ignore. - File 1 of 1 - Speed.rtf (01/31) | Radio Photos | |||
Long range rural wireless high speed data options... | Homebrew | |||
High Speed Packet Kits? | Digital | |||
High-Speed Internet Access for Rural Areas - The Right Way (not BPL) | Policy | |||
High Speed Packet Kits? | Digital |