So, today DXAce announces his departure from the group and I notice
the volume of posts is below normal. Is this a moment of near silence
in tribute to his departure?

On Feb 16, 10:52 pm, wrote:
So, today DXAce announces his departure from the group and I notice
the volume of posts is below normal. Is this a moment of near silence
in tribute to his departure?

Not hardly, only a moron like you could come up with such a twisted
conclusion. The reason for the lack of posts is everyone is out
celebrating the departure of dx"hershey squirts"ace.

The truth behind (no pun intended) his departure is his incontinence
has become so severe he can't stray far enough from the bathroom to
get to his computer. Couldn't happen to a more deserving asshole (no
pun intended).

On Feb 17, 1:34*pm, wrote:
On Feb 16, 10:52 pm, wrote:

So, today DXAce announces his departure from the group and I notice
the volume of posts is below normal. *Is this a moment of near silence
in tribute to his departure?
-
- Many, many regular posters from the past have also left for
- whatever reasons, left the hobby, different hobby or more
- than likely, RHF's idiotic antics and lengthy replies/posts.
-
- I don't see the names I used to see here and I seldom post,
- for a multitude of reasons, but RHF is one of them.
- Roy should either take more meds or pull the trigger.

FB3 - It is nice to be appreciated.
-ps- Thanks for making me a .38 e$pecial.

HOW TO ENJOY NEWSGROUPS :

# 1 - Post About What You Are About.
{Be Here For Yourself}

# 2 - Read Only What You Want To Read.
{Skip - Ignore the Rest}

# 3 - Reply When : You Have Something To Contribute.
{Act Naturally By Being Yourself}

On Feb 17, 2:13*pm, Telamon
wrote:
In article ,





wrote:
On Sun, 17 Feb 2008 13:34:58 -0800 (PST), wrote:

On Feb 16, 10:52 pm, wrote:
So, today DXAce announces his departure from the group and I notice
the volume of posts is below normal. *Is this a moment of near silence
in tribute to his departure?

Many, many regular posters from the past have also left for whatever
reasons, left the hobby, different hobby or more than likely, RHF's
idiotic antics and lengthy replies/posts.

I don't see the names I used to see here and I seldom post, for a
multitude of reasons, but RHF is one of them. Roy should either take
more meds or pull the trigger.

Ya know, he might just start a thread asking people to vote on their
preference. *And yes, many positive contributors have left over the
years and I'm sure has a lot to do with the signal to noise ratio.

- I suggest you use the " The RRS no-spin clueless
- factor report" thread.
- I post weekly results here Sunday night.
- So far on volume, incomprehensibility, copy and paste, and
- cluelessness RHF is going to be a winner three weeks in a row.
-
- --
- Telamon
- Ventura, California
-

Telamon - Your Report Is Appreciated.
+ Plus It Does Kind of Make You e$pecial.

HOW TO ENJOY NEWSGROUPS :

# 1 - Post About What You Are About.
{Be Here For Yourself}

# 2 - Read Only What You Want To Read.
{Skip - Ignore the Rest}

# 3 - Reply When : You Have Something To Contribute.
{Act Naturally : By Being Yourself}

"Telamon"

Please don't take offence to this post, I am writing out of respect
and
I am not trying to offend.

Feel free to be offended.

--
Telamon
Ventura, California

Telamon, damn it I was trying to be nice!!!

Burr

"msg"
Other than the Usenet amateur radio hierarchy, what other "shortwave
newsgroups" are there? (or do you refer to other types of forums not
on Usenet?) Certainly there are mailing lists with a higher S/N ratio.

Michael



Mike, what's a "S/N ratio"?

Burr

On Mon, 18 Feb 2008 13:03:22 +0800, "Burr"
wrote:


"msg"
Other than the Usenet amateur radio hierarchy, what other "shortwave
newsgroups" are there? (or do you refer to other types of forums not
on Usenet?) Certainly there are mailing lists with a higher S/N ratio.

Michael



Mike, what's a "S/N ratio"?

Burr

Signal to noise............you want the signal to be larger than the
noise.

wrote in message
...
On Mon, 18 Feb 2008 13:03:22 +0800, "Burr"
wrote:


"msg"
Other than the Usenet amateur radio hierarchy, what other "shortwave
newsgroups" are there? (or do you refer to other types of forums not
on Usenet?) Certainly there are mailing lists with a higher S/N ratio.

Michael



Mike, what's a "S/N ratio"?

Burr

Signal to noise............you want the signal to be larger than the
noise.

Got it. I think you said this higher in the tread.

Burr

On Feb 17, 9:02*pm, "Burr" wrote:
"Telamon"



* * Please don't take offence to this post, I am writing out of respect
and
I am not trying to offend.

Feel free to be offended.

--
Telamon
Ventura, California
-
- Telamon, damn it I was trying to be nice!!!
-
- Burr
-

Burr - I guess there is a Leason in there somewhere
for you from Telamon.

Burr - Best to stay clear of Me and of this Topic :
Or else Telamon just may be Targeting You next as one
of the "Clueless Ones" that are His Chosen Mission to
Eradicate from the Rec.Radio.Shortwave Newsgroup.

FWIW - Maybe about 60 of these 240 Posts for the Month
would not have been Posted* -except in reply to- Telamon's
"Clueless" Report Antics (~60). Factor in another ~60 "Me
Too" posts by others giving their two-cents-worth.
* Now that just might improve the Signal to Noise Ratio of
the Newsgroup. {180 Clueless Posts = Less Noise}

"RHF"

Burr - I guess there is a Leason in there somewhere
for you from Telamon.

Burr - Best to stay clear of Me and of this Topic :
Or else Telamon just may be Targeting You next as one
of the "Clueless Ones" that are His Chosen Mission to
Eradicate from the Rec.Radio.Shortwave Newsgroup.

FWIW - Maybe about 60 of these 240 Posts for the Month
would not have been Posted* -except in reply to- Telamon's
"Clueless" Report Antics (~60). Factor in another ~60 "Me
Too" posts by others giving their two-cents-worth.
* Now that just might improve the Signal to Noise Ratio of
the Newsgroup. {180 Clueless Posts = Less Noise}

Roy, Telamon and I have know eachother for years and we get along. I post
some crap from time to time and I think I have had my nose stuck in it.

But I'm your friend and I'll say it right here, but I still think your
repeat of the other post and your sig or to long.

As to "OT" post, if you don't want to read them then don't open them!!!!


Burr

PS: You dodn't answer my last email .