RadioBanter

RadioBanter (https://www.radiobanter.com/)
-   Shortwave (https://www.radiobanter.com/shortwave/)
-   -   David Gleason's 'baptismal' moniker (https://www.radiobanter.com/shortwave/130718-david-gleasons-baptismal-moniker.html)

m II February 24th 08 04:06 PM

David Gleason's 'baptismal' moniker
 

dxAcehole, pathological liar and common drunk, during his fifth annual
farewell tour, said:



It's a 'pattern' on your part!




Much like your regular public drunkeness, Bozo



===========================================
-------- Original Message --------
From: - Sat Feb 16 00:52:22 2008

I really don't want to say this, my many shortwave friends, but I find
that I am giving up far to much of my increasingly valuable time here
on RRS trying to educate the faux, the debutantes, and those who tote..

Therefore, I've simply decided to give up RRS.

Goodbye, I sincerely hope that you all find your niche in the world of SW.

dxAce
Michigan
USA
===========================================




m II February 24th 08 04:09 PM

David Gleason's 'baptismal' moniker
 
dxAcehole, pathological liar and common drunk, during his fifth annual
farewell tour, said:


Why? Because it's merely something that he made up circa 2000.



Personally, I prefer your BRAND NEW made up stuff:



===========================================
-------- Original Message --------
From: - Sat Feb 16 00:52:22 2008

I really don't want to say this, my many shortwave friends, but I
find that I am giving up far to much of my increasingly valuable
time here on RRS trying to educate the faux, the debutantes,
and those who tote..

Therefore, I've simply decided to give up RRS.

Goodbye, I sincerely hope that you all find your niche in the
world of SW.

dxAce
Michigan
USA
===========================================







[email protected] February 24th 08 05:15 PM

(OT) : Hey Everyone DX Ace Is Back !
 
On Sun, 24 Feb 2008 00:52:59 -0800 (PST), RHF
wrote:

On Feb 23, 11:13*pm, dxAce wrote:
-
- Why?
- Because it's merely something that he made up circa 2000.
- There are no 'church records', as Mr. Gleason is a liar
- and a fraud.
-

(OT) : Hey Everyone DX Ace Is Back !

Welcome Back DX Ace :o) ~ RHF
.

Are you certain it's the 'real DXAce' or could this be a faux DXAce?

[email protected] February 24th 08 05:16 PM

David Gleason's 'baptismal' moniker
 
On Sun, 24 Feb 2008 15:55:35 GMT, m II wrote:

dxAcehole said on his fifth annual farewell tour:

You built nothing.


That was right after he Lied His Effin Ass Off :

============================
I really don't want to say this, my many shortwave friends, but I find
that I am giving up far to much of my increasingly valuable time here
on RRS trying to educate the faux, the debutantes, and those who tote..

Therefore, I've simply decided to give up RRS.

Goodbye, I sincerely hope that you all find your niche in the world of SW.

dxAce
Michigan
USA
=============================

Are you certain it's the 'real DXAce' or could this be a faux DXAce?

Telamon February 24th 08 11:10 PM

David Gleason's 'baptismal' moniker
 
In article ,
dave wrote:

Telamon wrote:
In article ,
msg wrote:

Telamon wrote:

snip

So why does this name-calling persist? Are the participants invested
in some Lemon-Mathau "Grumpy Old Men" style of rivalry? There are
never any emoticons or cues to the intensity of remarks so one can
only conclude that they are either done in animosity or in
poorly-constructed mock indignation, left up to the reader to deduce.

Well Michael you picked an odd time to bring this up seeing as it has
died down. Maybe you are just bored? Troll someplace else.
I am just getting very disillusioned with the state of some Usenet
N.G.s that used to be informative and technically useful and have
become the arenas for bad behavior.

Suggestions to "ignore posts or threads" from certain originators
doesn't improve the S/N ratio, or make navigating any easier. The
ongoing noise level also dissuades new participants and repels
veterans.

There has been some recent discussion about reforming the charter
or at least the FAQ for this N.G.; I would like to see a clear
code of conduct as an amendment.

Look to comp.arch.embedded for a well behaved unmoderated N.G. with
truly outstanding participants and a lot of useful content.


I don't know what it will take to clean this news group up. Some people
that use the news group invite this kind of crap. This news group has
seen better days.


No damn sunspots, no damn shortwave.


Plenty to listen to from late afternoon to early mornings.

--
Telamon
Ventura, California

dxAce February 24th 08 11:16 PM

David Gleason's 'baptismal' moniker
 


Telamon wrote:

In article ,
dave wrote:

Telamon wrote:
In article ,
msg wrote:

Telamon wrote:

snip

So why does this name-calling persist? Are the participants invested
in some Lemon-Mathau "Grumpy Old Men" style of rivalry? There are
never any emoticons or cues to the intensity of remarks so one can
only conclude that they are either done in animosity or in
poorly-constructed mock indignation, left up to the reader to deduce.

Well Michael you picked an odd time to bring this up seeing as it has
died down. Maybe you are just bored? Troll someplace else.
I am just getting very disillusioned with the state of some Usenet
N.G.s that used to be informative and technically useful and have
become the arenas for bad behavior.

Suggestions to "ignore posts or threads" from certain originators
doesn't improve the S/N ratio, or make navigating any easier. The
ongoing noise level also dissuades new participants and repels
veterans.

There has been some recent discussion about reforming the charter
or at least the FAQ for this N.G.; I would like to see a clear
code of conduct as an amendment.

Look to comp.arch.embedded for a well behaved unmoderated N.G. with
truly outstanding participants and a lot of useful content.

I don't know what it will take to clean this news group up. Some people
that use the news group invite this kind of crap. This news group has
seen better days.


No damn sunspots, no damn shortwave.


Plenty to listen to from late afternoon to early mornings.


And when nothing is going on, and ya already got the QSL's, one can always get
on the monkey boy 'Eduardo' and urge him to provide that documentation!



Telamon February 24th 08 11:17 PM

(OT) : Speaking of "Clueless" Behavior - Once Again It's Telamon !
 
In article
,
RHF wrote:

On Feb 23, 8:16*pm, Telamon
wrote:
In article
,

*RHF wrote:
On Feb 23, 3:56*pm, msg wrote:
-
- *Fromwww.davidgleason.com:


SNIP

-
- Hey clueless, nobody cares about this.
- It has nothing to do with RRS.
-

Telamon - Clueless ? - Now Just Who Is The Clueless One !


Well, you will just have to read tonight's RRS no-spin clueless factor
report to find out. You were way ahead but Eduardo is catching up.

--
Telamon
Ventura, California

Telamon February 24th 08 11:18 PM

(OT) : Speaking of "Clueless" Behavior - Once Again It's Telamon !
 
In article ,
wrote:

On Sun, 24 Feb 2008 00:49:20 -0800 (PST), RHF
wrote:

On Feb 23, 8:16*pm, Telamon
wrote:
In article
,

*RHF wrote:
On Feb 23, 3:56*pm, msg wrote:
-
- *Fromwww.davidgleason.com:

SNIP

-
- Hey clueless, nobody cares about this.
- It has nothing to do with RRS.
-


The entertainment value of your feud has passed; if neither of you is
going to extend an olive branch why don't you at least accept a
cease-fire.


I don't see a positive contribution from you about this.

--
Telamon
Ventura, California

Telamon February 24th 08 11:30 PM

David Gleason's 'baptismal' moniker
 
In article ,
dxAce wrote:

Telamon wrote:

In article ,
dave wrote:

Telamon wrote:
In article ,
msg wrote:

Telamon wrote:

snip

So why does this name-calling persist? Are the participants invested
in some Lemon-Mathau "Grumpy Old Men" style of rivalry? There are
never any emoticons or cues to the intensity of remarks so one can
only conclude that they are either done in animosity or in
poorly-constructed mock indignation, left up to the reader to deduce.

Well Michael you picked an odd time to bring this up seeing as it has
died down. Maybe you are just bored? Troll someplace else.
I am just getting very disillusioned with the state of some Usenet
N.G.s that used to be informative and technically useful and have
become the arenas for bad behavior.

Suggestions to "ignore posts or threads" from certain originators
doesn't improve the S/N ratio, or make navigating any easier. The
ongoing noise level also dissuades new participants and repels
veterans.

There has been some recent discussion about reforming the charter
or at least the FAQ for this N.G.; I would like to see a clear
code of conduct as an amendment.

Look to comp.arch.embedded for a well behaved unmoderated N.G. with
truly outstanding participants and a lot of useful content.

I don't know what it will take to clean this news group up. Some people
that use the news group invite this kind of crap. This news group has
seen better days.


No damn sunspots, no damn shortwave.


Plenty to listen to from late afternoon to early mornings.


And when nothing is going on, and ya already got the QSL's, one can always get
on the monkey boy 'Eduardo' and urge him to provide that documentation!


He is to busy eating crow to do that.

--
Telamon
Ventura, California

dxAce February 24th 08 11:40 PM

David Gleason's 'baptismal' moniker
 


Telamon wrote:

In article ,
dxAce wrote:

Telamon wrote:

In article ,
dave wrote:

Telamon wrote:
In article ,
msg wrote:

Telamon wrote:

snip

So why does this name-calling persist? Are the participants invested
in some Lemon-Mathau "Grumpy Old Men" style of rivalry? There are
never any emoticons or cues to the intensity of remarks so one can
only conclude that they are either done in animosity or in
poorly-constructed mock indignation, left up to the reader to deduce.

Well Michael you picked an odd time to bring this up seeing as it has
died down. Maybe you are just bored? Troll someplace else.
I am just getting very disillusioned with the state of some Usenet
N.G.s that used to be informative and technically useful and have
become the arenas for bad behavior.

Suggestions to "ignore posts or threads" from certain originators
doesn't improve the S/N ratio, or make navigating any easier. The
ongoing noise level also dissuades new participants and repels
veterans.

There has been some recent discussion about reforming the charter
or at least the FAQ for this N.G.; I would like to see a clear
code of conduct as an amendment.

Look to comp.arch.embedded for a well behaved unmoderated N.G. with
truly outstanding participants and a lot of useful content.

I don't know what it will take to clean this news group up. Some people
that use the news group invite this kind of crap. This news group has
seen better days.


No damn sunspots, no damn shortwave.

Plenty to listen to from late afternoon to early mornings.


And when nothing is going on, and ya already got the QSL's, one can always get
on the monkey boy 'Eduardo' and urge him to provide that documentation!


He is to busy eating crow to do that.


Yeah, crow is a traditional Hispanic dish.




All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:29 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com